ANALISIS HUBUNGAN ANTARA TRUST, COMMITMENT, ECONOMIC SATISFACTION DAN NON-ECONOMIC SATISFACTION DALAM MANUFACTURER- SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS PADA INDUSTRI PENGOLAHAN DI SURABAYA

  • Arlintya Yustica Fanny Jurusan Managemen / Universitas Surabaya
  • Antonius Budhiman Jurusan Managemen / Universitas Surabaya
  • Fitri Novika Widjaja Jurusan Managemen / Universitas Surabaya
Abstract Views: 113 times
PDF - FULL TEXT Downloads: 277 times
Keywords: Trust, Commitment, Economic Satisfaction, Manufacturer-Supplier relationships, Non-Economic Satisfaction

Abstract

Abstrak - Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis adanya pengaruh Trust, Commitment, Economic Satisfaction dan Non-Economic Satisfaction terhadap Manufacturer-Supplier di Surabaya. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan menggunakan metode SEM analysis. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel berupa industri pengolahan dengan membagikan kuosioner ke masing-masing industri pada bagian purchasing atau procurement yang memiliki pengalaman kerja kurang lebih satu tahun. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sebesar 120 kuisioner yang dibagikan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa semua hipotesis yang didukung oleh dimensi Trust, Commitment, Economic Satisfaction dan NonEconomic Satisfaction menunjukkan bahwa Economic Satisfaction memiliki hubungan yang positif terhadap Trust, Trust terhadap Commitment dan Trust terhadap Non-Economic Satisfaction.

Kata Kunci: : Trust, Commitment, Economic Satisfaction, Manufacturer-Supplier relationships, Non-Economic Satisfaction

Abstract - This research aims to determain and analyze the influence of Trust, Commitment, Economic Satisfaction and Non-Economic Satisfaction towards manufacturer-supplier in Surabaya. This research uses quantitative approach by using SEM analysis method. This research uses samples of industry and the targets of questionnaire are those who work in the purchasing or procurement department and have a working experience in that section for 1 year. The number of samples used were 120 samples. The results of this study indicate that all hypothesis between Trust, Commitment, Economic Satisfaction and NonEconomic Satisfaction show that Economic Satisfaction to Trust, Trust to Commitment and Trust to Economic Satisfaction has a positive relationship

Kata Kunci: : Trust, Commitment, Economic Satisfaction, Manufacturer-Supplier relationships, Non-Economic Satisfaction

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chen, Z., Huang, Y. and Sternquist, B. (2011), “Guanxi Practice and Chinese Buyer-Supplier Relationships: The Buyer’s Perspective” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 569-580.

Del Bosque Rodriguez, I.R., Agudo, J.C. and San Martin Gutierrez, H. (2006), “Determinants of Economic and Social Satisfaction in ManufacturerDistributor Relationships”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 666-675.

Farelly, F.J. and Quester, P.G. (2005), “Examining Important Relationship Quality Construct of the Focal Sponsorship Exchange”, Industrial Marketing Managemnt, Vol. 34 No.3, pp. 211-219.

Ferro, C., Padin, C., Svensson, G. and Payan, J. (2016), “Trust and Commitment as Mediators between Economic and Non-Economic Satisfaction in Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships”, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 13-23.

Geyskens, Inge., Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp., and Nirmalya Kumar (1999). “A Meta-Analysis of Satisfaction in Marketing Channel Relationships,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (May), pp. 223–238.

Geyskens, Inge., Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp., and Nirmalya Kumar (1999). “Economic and Social Satisfaction : Measurement and Relevance to Marketing Channel Relationship”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 76 No 1, pp 11-32.

Hudnurkar, M., Jakhar, S., Urvhashi, R. (2014). “Factors Affecting Collaboration in Supply Chain: A Literature Review”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 133, pp. 189-202.

Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D. (1994), “The Commitment Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing”, The Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No3, pp. 20-38.

Mpinganjira, M., Bogaards, M., Svensson, G. and Mysen, T. (2014), “Precursors and Outcomes of Satisfaction in Bussines Relationship: A Replication Study”, Mnagement Dynamics, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp 2-13.

Nyaga, G.N., Whipple, J.M. and Lynch, D.F. (2010). “Examining Supply Chain Relationships: Do Buyer and Supplier Perspectives on Collaborative Relationships Differ?”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 101-114.

Ramaseshan, B., Yip, L.S. and Pae, J.H. (2006), “Power, Satisfaction, and Relationship Commitment in Chinese-Store Tenant Relationship and Their Impact on Performance”, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 82 No. 1, pp. 63-70.

Rutherford, B. (2012), “Building Buyer Commitment to The Salesperson”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 65 No. 7, pp. 960-967.

Sahadev, S. (2008), “Economic Satisfaction and Relationship Comitment in Channels: The Moderating Role of Environmental Uncertainty, Collaborative Communication and Coordination Strategy”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 42 No ½, pp. 178-195.

Svensson, G., Mysen, T. and Payan, J. (2010), “Balancing The Sequential Logic of Quality Constructs in Manufacturing-Supplier Relationships-Causes and Outcomes”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 63 No. 11, pp. 1209-1214.

https://www.bps.goid/

https://surabayakota.bps.go.id/
Published
2019-09-01