https://journal.ubaya.ac.id/index.php/LDLR/issue/feed 2025-07-11T08:12:22+00:00 Administrator lexdiscipuluslawreview@gmail.com Open Journal Systems <p>Lex Discipulus Law Review is (LDLR) an open access, peer reviewed journal for all college students. LDLR itself was formed to be a forum for all Law Faculty students to express their thoughts and opinions which will then be published in a journal. LDLR will publish the journal twice a year (March and September) and accept original research articles containing well-designed research with clear and logical analysis and interpretation.</p> <p>With the establishment of the LDLR, it is hoped that the thoughts and ideas from Law Faculty students can be useful. In order to realize this goal, we invite all Law Faculty students to submit articles which are original works in the fields of Civil Law, Criminal Law, Constitutional Law, State Administrative Law, and International Law. We accept articles in Indonesian and English</p> https://journal.ubaya.ac.id/index.php/LDLR/article/view/7355 2025-07-11T08:12:22+00:00 Michael Angelo Wibisono s120122002@student.ubaya.ac.id

<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Article 1 of the UN Charter affirms that the UN is present to maintain and preserve international peace and security. One of them is regarding the implementation of humanitarian intervention according to Chapter VII of the UN Charter. The implementation of humanitarian intervention must pay attention to the principle of non-intervention, namely not interfering in the affairs of other countries other than for humanitarian reasons according to Article 2 Number 7 of the UN Charter, but there are still cases of humanitarian intervention based on the interests of certain countries such as the 2003 Iraq Invasion, NATO's intervention in Libya in 2011 which actually killed civilians, and the failure of the UN to prevent the genocide in Rwanda in 1994. In fact, the United Nations Security Council (hereinafter referred to as the UNSC) can force, impose sanctions, including deploying military force to stop these violations as a form of humanitarian intervention. Therefore, this writing is done to discuss the role and authority of the UNSC in carrying out humanitarian intervention and the application of humanitarian intervention in resolving international problems. By using the juridical-normative method and conceptual approach along with the approach of legislation, the results of this writing show that the role of the UNSC is to maintain international peace and security which can be done through humanitarian intervention as one way and the implementation of humanitarian intervention must be purely based on humanitarian reasons without the influence of national interests and through the authorization process from the UN first along with the conditions that are expected to be reformed in the UN Charter.</em></p>

2025-07-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 LEX DISCIPULUS LAW REVIEW https://journal.ubaya.ac.id/index.php/LDLR/article/view/7414 2025-07-11T08:12:22+00:00 Ivan Wijaya s120122041@student.ubaya.ac.id

<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>The humanitarian crisis experienced by the Rohingya ethnic group in Myanmar has raised a dilemma in the international legal order, between the principle of state sovereignty and international obligations to protect human rights. This article aims to analyze Indonesia's contribution to the implementation of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and non-refoulement principles as two main norms in modern international law, especially in the context of handling Rohingya refugees. With a normative legal approach and literature study of international legal documents, UN reports, and Indonesian foreign policy, this study shows that although Indonesia is not a state party to the 1951 Convention, its practices show the application of the principle of non-refoulement as part of jus cogens. Within the R2P framework, Indonesia plays a role through multilateral diplomacy in ASEAN and the United Nations, as well as initiatives such as Formula 4+1. However, the limitations of the UNSC in acting due to political vetoes and ASEAN's principle of non-intervention are the main obstacles to the collective implementation of R2P. This article concludes that Indonesia's success as a regional actor in this crisis requires a proactive diplomatic strategy, encouraging reform in the UNSC, and consistency in making humanitarian values a priority over political interests. It is hoped that these findings can provide academic contributions to the study of international law and the role of Indonesian diplomacy in handling contemporary humanitarian crises.</em></p>

2025-07-11T00:00:00+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 LEX DISCIPULUS LAW REVIEW