The Psychopaths’ Moral Decision Making
Abstract Views:
6 times
PDF-Full Text Downloads:
4 times
Abstract
The present paper will investigate whether psychopaths are more prone to make utilitarian decisions in moral dilemmas. This ‘talent’ may be caused by a dysfunction in emotional brain circuits in psychopaths. Since utilitarian decisions are seen as the ‘right’ decision – in an economic point of view - one can make in moral dilemmas, it is interesting to see, whether psychopathic traits may also have its advantages.
Studi pendahuluan ini meneliti apakah para psikopat cenderung membuat putusan bermanfaat dalam dilema moral. “Talenta” ini mungkin disebabkan disfungsi dalam sirkuit emosional di otak para psikopat. Karena putusan bermanfaat dilihat sebagai putusan yang “benar” – dari sudut pandang ekonomis – yang dapat diambil dalam dilemma moral, adalah menarik melihat, apakah sifat-sifat psikopat juga memiliki kelebihannya juga.
Downloads
References
Glenn, A. L., Raine, A., Schug, R.A. (2009a). The neural correlates of moral decision-making in psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 5-9.
Glenn, A. L., Raine, A., Schug, R. A., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2009b). Increased DLPFC activity during moral decision-making in psychopathy. Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 909-911.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRIinvestigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. SCIENCE, 293, 2105-2108.
Greene, J. & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 517-523.
Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgments. Nature, 446, 908-911.
Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Cermolacce, M., & Wicker, B. (2009). Do psychopathic patients use their DLPFC when making decisions in moral dilemmas? Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 908-911.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
DOI:


