Perceived Organizational Support and Performance: A Meta-Analysis Study
DOI:
Abstract Views:
6 times
PDF-Full Text Downloads:
4 times
Abstract
This study conducted a meta-analysis in order to see the link between perceived organisational support (POS) and work performance. Organizational Support Theory and Social Exchange Theory (Blau, 1964) was used as a framework for discussing correlation between POS and work performance. After meta-analysis was conducted to 20 primary study with as many as 6,645 subjects, the result showed that on the average correlation coefficient was .219 (r^ = .219), with the corrected SD being .1048. The differences of various correlations could be caused by, among others, sampling error of 23.75% and 1.42% for the error in measuring either dependent or independent variables. Therefore, hypothesis stating that there is positive correlation between POS and work performance could be accepted.
Studi ini melakukan meta-analisis dengan tujuan melihat keterkaitan antara persepsi terhadap dukungan organisasi dan kinerja.. Teori dukungan organisasi dan teori pertukaran sosial digunakan untuk membahas hubungan antara persepsi terhadap dukungan organisasi dan kinerja. Setelah dilakukan meta-analisis terhadap 20 studi primer dengan 6,645 subjek, diperoleh rata-rata koefisien korelasi sebesar .219 (r^= .219), dengan SD yang dikoreksi sebesar .1048. Perbedaan variasi korelasi dapat disebabkan antara lain kesalahan pengambilan sampel sebesar 23.75% dan kesalahan pengukuran variabel bebas maupun tergantung sebesar 1.42%. Dengan demikian, hipotesis yang menyatakan ada hubungan positif antara persepsi terhadap dukungan organisasi dan kinerja dapat diterima.
Downloads
References
Armely, S., Eisenberger, E., Fasolo, P., & Lynch. (1998). Perceived organizational support and police performance: The moderating influence of socioemotional needs. Journal of Applied Psychology. 83(2), 288-297
Blau, P., 1964. Exchange and power in social life. New York : Wiley.
Borman, W.C, & Motowidlo, 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include element of contextual performance. In N.Schmitt & W.C.Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp71-98). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Byrne, Z.S., & Hochwarter, W.A.(2008). Perceived organizational support and performance relationships across levels of organizational cynicism. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23(1), 54-72.
Butts, M.M., Vanderberg, R. J., DeJoy, D.M., Schaffer, B.S., & Wilson,M.G. (2009). Individual reactions to high involvement work processes: Investigating the role of empowerment and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,14(2), 122-136.
Chien, C. & Hung ( 2008). Goal orientation, service behavior and service performance. Asia Pacific Management Review, 13(2). 513 – 529.
Chen, K. H., Yien, J. M., & Huang, K. P. (2011). Social support, overseas adjusments and work performance of foreign labor in Taiwan. African Journal of Business
Management, 5(22), 9231-9239.
DeConinck, J. B, & Johnson, J. T., (2009) The effect of perceived support, perceived organizational support, and organizational justice on turnover among salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 29(4), 333-350.
Djati, S. P., & Darmawan, D. (2005). Pengaruh kinerja karyawan terhadap kepuasan, kepercayaan, dan kesetiaan pelanggan. Jurnal Manajemen & Kewirausahaan, 7(1), 48-59.
Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2010). Exploring alternative relationship between perceived investment in employee development, perceived organizational support and
employee outcomes. Human Resource Management Journal, 20(2), 138-156.
Dukf, A. B., Treadway, D. C., Goodman, J. M., & Breland, J.W. (2009). Perceived organizational support as a moderator of emotional labor/outcomes relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39,(5), 1013-1034.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D.,&Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51.
Erdogan, B., & Enders, J., (2007). Support from the top: Supervisors’ perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 321-330.
Feng, W. C. (2010). An empirical study of the performance of university teachers based on organizational commitment, job stress, mental health and achievement motivation. Canadian Social Science, 6(4), 127-140.
Farh, Jiing –Lih, Hackett, R.D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizationalsupport-employee outcome relationship in China: Comparing the effect of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729.
Gadot, V.E., & Talmud, I. (2010). Organizational politics and job outcomes: The moderating effect of trust and social support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11), 2829-2861.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25b(2), 161-178.
Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L.(2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Hochwarter, W. A., Treadway, D. C., Witt, L. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2006). The interaction of social skill and organizational support on job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 482-489.
Kuncoro, A, K., & Acin, E. (2009). Pengaruh effort, support dan ability terhadap kinerja karyawan, Jurnal Manajemen, 1(1), 37- 49.
Logan, M.S., & Ganster, D. C. (2007). The effect of empowerment on attitudes and performance: The role of social support and empowerment beliefs. Journal of Management Studies, 44 (8), 1523-1550.
Lynch, D.P., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli. (1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior-versus-superior performance by wary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 467– 483
Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and non-work creativity support to employees’ creativity performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757-767.
Meyer, J., Stanley, D., Hercovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20- 52.
Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behavior? Academy of Management Journal, 41, 351–357.
Muse, L. A., & Stamper, C. L. (2007). Perceived organizational support: Evidence for a mediated associationwith work performance. Journal of Managerial Issue, 19(4), 517-535.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Piercy, N. F, Cravens, D. W., Lane, N., Vorhies, D. W. (2006). Driving organizational citizenship behavior and salesperson in role behavior performance: The role of management control and perceived organizational support. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 34(2), 244-262.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
Settoon, P. R., Bennet, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: perceived organizational support. leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219-227.
Shanock, L. R., & Eisenberger, R. (2006). When supervisor feel supported: Relationships with subordinates’ perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 689-695.
Shore, L. M., Coyle-Shapiro, J.A. (2003). New developments in the employee-organization relationship. J. Organ. Behav, 24, 443-450.
Tell, S. R. (2003). Relationships among perceived organizational support, teacher efficacy and teacher performance (Unpublished dissertation). The Faculty of The California School of Professsional Psychology.
Wallace, J. C., Edwards, B. D., Arnold, T., & Frazier (2009). Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 254-262.
Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A sosial exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal. 40(1), 82-111.
Watt, J. D., & Hargis, M. B. (2010). Boredom proneness: Its relationship with subjective underemployment, perceived organizational support, and job performance. J Bus Psychol, 25, 163-174.
Witt, L.A., & Carlson, D. S. (2006). The work-family interface and job performance: Moderating effect of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 343-357.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
