Language Readability Levels of Reading Passages and Comprehension Levels of Exercises in Scaffolding English Coursebooks
Abstract Views:
6 times
PDF-Full Text Downloads:
4 times
Abstract
Reading passages should have language readability levels suiting to students’ grade levels. Indeed, reading comprehension exercises should help students develop their competences in comprehending texts. This study investigated the language readability levels of reading passages and the comprehension levels of exercises in Scaffolding for Grades 7, 8, and 9. Assessed using Flesch-Kincaid formula and Fry figure, the language readability levels of reading passages in Scaffolding coursebooks were below the grade levels of Indonesia EFL students using the coursebooks. Judged using Barrett’s Reading Comprehension Taxonomy, exercises in Scaffolding coursebooks were dominated by literal comprehension and reorganization exercises, and supplemented with low numbers of inferential comprehension and evaluation exercises.
Bacaan dalam buku teks seharusnya mengandung bahasa (kata dan kalimat) yang dapat di- mengerti siswa yang menggunakannya. Latihan yang menyertai bacaan juga seharusnya mengembangkan kemampuan siswa untuk memahami bacaan. Penelitian ini mengevaluasi tingkat keterpahaman bahasa dalam bacaan pada buku teks bahasa Inggris Scaffolding oleh siswa, dan seberapa besar latihan yang menyertai bacaan membantu pemahaman bacaan oleh siswa. Hasil evaluasi keterpahaman bahasa dalam bacaan menggunakan formula Flesch-Kincaid dan Fry menunjukkan bahwa bahasa yang digunakan dalam bacaan di bawah tingkat siswa yang menggunakan buku teks tersebut. Hasil evaluasi latihan bacaan menggunakan Taksonomi Barrett menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar latihan mengembangkan pemahaman literal dan reorganisasi, dengan sebagian kecil latihan mengembangkan pemahaman inferensial dan evaluasi.
Downloads
References
Browne, C. M. (1996). Japanese EFL reading texts: How readable are they? Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 8(28), 1-12.
Carrell, P. L. (1987). Readability in ESL. Reading in a foreign language, 4(1), 21-40.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Education.
Donovan, C. A., Smolkin, L. B., & Lomax, R. G. (2000). Beyond the independent-level text: Considering the reader-text match in first graders’ self-selections during recreational reading. Reading Psychology, 21(4), 309-335.
Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516.
Greenfield, J. (1999). Classic readability formulas in an EFL context: Are they valid for Japanese speakers? (Education Doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadephia, United States.
Grzybek, P. (2010). Text difficulty and the Arens-Altman law. In P. Grzybek, E. Kelih, & J. Macutek (Eds), Text and language: Structures, functions, interrelations, quantitative perspectives (pp. 57-70). Wien: Praesens Verlag.
Hamsik, M. J. (1984). Reading, readability, and the ESL reader (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, USA.
Heilman, A. W., Blair, T. R., & Rupley, W. H. (1981). Principles and practices of teaching reading. Ohio, US: A Bell & Howell Company.
Hiebert, E. H. (2005). The effects of text difficulty on second graders’ fluency development. Reading Psychology, 26(2), 183-209.
Carrell, P. L. (1987). Readability in ESL. Reading in a foreign language, 4(1), 21-40.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford, UK: Macmillan Education.
Donovan, C. A., Smolkin, L. B., & Lomax, R. G. (2000). Beyond the independent-level text: Considering the reader-text match in first graders’ self-selections during recreational reading. Reading Psychology, 21(4), 309-335.
Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513-516. Greenfield, J. (1999). Classic readability formulas in an EFL context: Are they valid for Japanese speakers? (Education Doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadephia, United States.
Grzybek, P. (2010). Text difficulty and the Arens-Altman law. In P. Grzybek, E. Kelih, & J. Macutek (Eds), Text and language: Structures, functions, interrelations, quantitative perspectives (pp. 57-70). Wien: Praesens Verlag.
Hamsik, M. J. (1984). Reading, readability, and the ESL reader (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, USA.
Heilman, A. W., Blair, T. R., & Rupley, W. H. (1981). Principles and practices of teaching reading. Ohio, US: A Bell & Howell Company.
Hiebert, E. H. (2005). The effects of text difficulty on second graders’ fluency development. Reading Psychology, 26(2), 183-209.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
DOI:


