The Role of Supportive Leader, Work Engagement, and Self-Efficacy in Employees' Innovative Behavior: Empirical Study on a National Independent Company
DOI:
Abstract Views:
5 times
PDF-Full Text Downloads:
3 times
Abstract
Global competitions of the business world today not only make employers think about the advances in technology and additional capital. The quality of human resources was also the focus of study to prepare human resources to compete. One important aspect of this competition is innovation, which is in the individual level known as innovative behavior. The topic of this study is the effect of supportive leader and self-efficacy to employee innovative behavior with work engagement as mediator. Participants/respondents (N = 99) were employees of a national private company. Data analysis was conducted based on the stages of mediation assumption testing of Baron and Kenny (1986) with regression analysis (both simple and multiple regressions). Result showed that work engagement significantly functioned as mediator variable on effect of self-efficacy to innovative behavior. But work engagement is not significant as a mediator variable on effect of supportive leader to innovative behavior.
Persaingan global dunia usaha saat ini tidak hanya membuat para pengusaha berpikir tentang kemajuan teknologi dan penambahan modal usaha. Kualitas sumber daya manusia (SDM) juga menjadi focus kajian untuk menyiapkan SDM yang dapat berkompetisi. Salah satu aspek yang penting dalam kompetisi ini adalah innovasi, yang dalam level individual dikenal dengan perilaku inovatif. Penelitian ini mengaji pengaruh supportive leader dan self-efficacy terhadap perilaku inovatif karyawan dengan dimediasi oleh work engagement. Penelitian ini dilakukan terhadap 99 responden yaitu karyawan perusahaan swasta nasional di kota X. Penelitian ini dianalisis dengan menggunakan tahapan pengujian asumsi mediasi dari Baron dan Kenny (1986) yang melibatkan teknik analisis regresi (baik sederhana maupun multi-regresi). Hasil penelitian menyebutkan bahwa work engagement terbukti mampu berperan sebagai mediator pada pengaruh self-efficacy terhadap perilaku innovatif karyawan, namun tidak berfungsi sebagai mediator pada pengaruh supportive leader terhadap perilaku inovatif karyawan.
Downloads
References
Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality & social psychology, 45, 357 - 376.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy in changing societies, New York : Cambridge University Press
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of organizational behavior,14(2). 103-118.
Carmeli, A., Meitar, R., & Weisberg, J. (2006). Self-leadership skills and innovative behavior at work. Intenational Journal of Manpower, 27(1), 75 -90.
Creswell, J.,W. (2005) Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating, quantitative and quail-tative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education. Inc.
De Jong, J. J., & Kemp, R. (2003). Determinant of co worker innovative behavior: an investigation into knowledge intensive services. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 189 - 212.
Gardner, T. (2005). Interfirm Competition for Human Resources Management Theory: Evidence from Software Industry. Academy Management Journal, 48(2), 237 - 256.
Guilford, J. (1956). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill.
Head, B. (2000). How to improve organizational climate. Queensland: Officer of the Public Service Commissioner.
House , R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Conntemporary Business,3, 81 - 98.
Janssen, O. (2004). How fariness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 201 - 215.
Judge, T. A., Jackson, C. L., Shaw, J. C., Scott, B. A., & Rich, B. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differrences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 107 -127.
Kanter, R. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovations in organization. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings, Research in organizational behavior(pp. 169 - 211). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensional measrue of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284 -296.
Muller, J., MacLean, R., & Biggs, H. (2009). The impact of a supportive leadership program in a policing organisation from the participant's perspective. Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 32(1), 69 - 79.
MacKinnon, D.P. 2008. Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. New York: Lawrence Earlbaum Assocates
Mamma, E.S. & Nindyati, A.D. (2011) Pengaruh suportive leader terhadap work engagement karyawan (Studi pada PT. Semen Tonasa). Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Inquiry, 4(1), 31 -38
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creative syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Buletin, 103, 27 - 43.
Naomi, P., & Nindyati, A. D. (2011).Pengaruh self-esteem dan self-efficacy terhadap kinerja akademik mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 12(1), 120 - 133.
Newton, C. J., & Maierhofer, N. I. (2005). Supportive leadership and well being: The role of team value congruence. Proceedings 40th Australian Psychological Society Annual Conference (pp. 208 - 212). Melbourne: QutePrints.
Nindyati, A.D. (2004). Sex role identity dan self-efficacy sebagai mediator hubungan tiga kebutuhan McClelland dengan kinerja Beauty Advisor PT.X. In A.S. Munandar, B.Sjabadhyni, & R.P. Wutun (Eds.), Peran budaya organisasi dalam peningkatan unjuk kerja perusahaan ( pp. 103 – 127). Jakarta: Bagian Psikologi Industri dan Organisas, Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia
Nitisemito, A. S. (1996). Manajemen personalia: Manajemen sumber daya manusia.Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Pajares, F. (2002) Overview of social cognitive theory and self-efficacy. Retrieved from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html
Raferty, A. E., & Griffin , M. A. (2004). Dimension of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quaeterly, 15(3), 329 - 354.
Robbins, S. P., & Timothy A. J. (2008). Organizational behavior(12th ed.). San Diego: Prentice Hall.
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Piero, J. M. (2003). Linking organizational facilitators and work engagement to extra role performance and customer loyalty: The mediating role of service climate. Journal of applied psychology. 90(6), 1217-1227
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). UWES-Utrecht work engagement scale. Netherlands: Utrecht University.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701 - 716.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innonavtion in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580 - 607.
Spector, P. E. (2009) Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice, Canada: John Willey & Sons
Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problem in the management of inovation. Management Science, 32, 590 - 608.
Weisberg, R. W. (2006) Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons
Weiten, W., Lloyd, M. A., Dunn, D. S., & Hammer, E. Y. (2008). Psychology applied to modern life: Adjustment in the 21st century (9th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1989). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social Behavior, 4, 15 - 30.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293 - 321.
Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organization (3rd ed., J. Hudaya, Pengalih bhs). Jakarta: Prenhallindo.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
