Internal Structure Test of Big Five Inventory
DOI:
Abstract Views:
6 times
PDF-Full Text Downloads:
4 times
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explain the internal structure of Big Five personality trait instrument, namely the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Maximum likelihood method of factor analysis in SPSS 16.0 was used to find suitability between the model proposed and data collected. Subjects (N=156) were all psychology students. Results reveal that five factors personality (Big Five) as proposed by personality theory is not in accordance with data collect- ed. Seven factor model is more appropriate to explain personality, namely openness to ex- perience, conscientiousness, friendliness, introversion, emotional stability, aggressiveness, and vulnerability. The findings have two alternative meanings, first an essential difference in meaning derived from the translated instrument items that could exhibit different responses, and second, the large spectrum of personality characteristics in "Big Five" enables the emergence of a new form of different personality characteristic as a consequence of overlapping between factors of the theory.
Penelitian ini berusaha menjelaskan struktur internal alat ukur big five personality trait, yakni Big Five Inventory (BFI). Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis faktor menggunakan metode maximum likelihood dalam program SPSS 16.0 untuk mencari kesesuaian model yang diajukan dengan data yang diperoleh. Subjek (N=156) adalah mahasiswa psikologi. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa model lima faktor yang diajukan dalam teori kepribadian big five tidak sesuai dengan data yang didapatkan. Adapun, model tujuh faktor lebih cocok untuk menjelaskan kepribadian dalam subjek penelitian ini. Tujuh faktor itu terdiri atas openness, conscientious- ness, friendliness, introversion, emotional stability, aggressiveness, dan vulnerability. Perlu diperhatikan bahwa terdapat dua alternatif pemaknaan dalam temuan ini. Pertama adanya perbedaan esensi makna pada terjemahan butir alat ukur yang mungkin memunculkan perbedaan respons. Kedua adalah luasnya karakteristik kepribadian Big Five yang memungkin- kan terbentuknya karakteristik kepribadian yang berbeda akibat singgungan antar-faktor dalam teori tersebut.
Downloads
References
Azwar, S. (2008). Reliabilitas dan validitas (3th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta.
Azwar, S. (2008). Penyusunan skala psikologi. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta.
Benet-Martinez, V., & John, O. P. (1998). Los cinco grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: Multitrait multimethods analyses of the big five in Spanish and English. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(3), 729-750.
Burger, J. M. (2004). Personality (6th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
Chadha, N. K. (2009). Applied psychometry. New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd.
Cooper, A. J., Smillie, L. D., & Corr, P. J. (2010). A confirmatory factor analysis of the mini-IPIP five-factor model personality scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 688-691.
De Raad, B., & Barelds, D. P. H., (2008). A new taxonomy of Dutch personality traits based on a comprehensive and unrestricted list of descriptors. Journal of personality and social psychology, 94(2), 347-364.
De Raad, B., & Perugini, M. (2002). Big five assessment. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publisher.
Feist, G. J., & Feist, G. (2006). Theories of personality (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A very brief measure of the big five personality domains. Journal of research in personality, 37, 504-528.
Hair, J. E., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis: Pocket guides to social work research method. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Hopkins W. G. (2006). A spreadsheet for combining outcomes from several subject groups. Sportscience, 10, 50-53. (sportsci.org/2006/wghcom.htm).
John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. Pervin and O.P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford (in press)
Karaman, N. G., Dogan, T., & Coban, A. E. (2010). A study to adapt the big five inventory to Turkish. Procedia social and behavioral sciences, 2, 2357-2359.
Mastuti, E. (2005). Analisis alat ukur kepribadian big five (adaptasi dari IPIP) pada mahasiswa suku Jawa. INSAN, 7(3), 264-276.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516.
McCroskey, B. J., & Feldbaum, C. L. (2002). Statistical basic revisited for vocational evaluation and earning capacity analysis under daubert: A need for forensic standards. Diunduh dari http://www.vocationology.com /JFV/abstracts 1_1/abstract1_1_b.htm
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Neuman, W. L. (1999). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (2nd ed.). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Norman, G. R., & Streiner, D. L. (2008). Biostatistic: The bare essentials (3rd ed.). People Medical Publishing House: Shelton, Connecticut.
Plaisant, O., Courtois, R., Reveillere C., Mendelsohn, G. A., & John, O. P. (2010). Factor structure and internal reliability of the French big five inventory (BFI-Fr). convergent and discriminant validation with the NEO-PI-R. Annales medico-psychologiques, 168, 97-106.
Srivastava, S. (2010). Measuring the Big Five Personality Factors. Diunduh dari http://www.uoregon.edu/~sanjay/bigfive.html
Surijah, E. A., & Sia, T. (2007). Mahasiswa versus tugas: Prokrastinasi akademik dan conscientiousness. Anima, Indonesian Psychological Journal, 22(4), 352-374.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
