Locus of Control Sebagai Moderator Komitmen Organisasi: Peran Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi dan Kepercayaan Terhadap Pemimpin
DOI:
Abstract Views:
0 times
PDF-Full Text Downloads:
0 times
Abstract
This study examined the relationship of perceived organizational support and trust in leadership, to organizational commitment. This study also examined the moderating effect of locus of control on the relationship between those predictors and the criterion. Lecturers (N = 80) of a private university in Yogyakarta were surveyed using four related scales. The data were analyzed through regression analysis. Results show a) a significant relationship of perceived organizational support, trust in leadership, and locus of control to organizational commitment, b) perceived organizational support was positively related to organizational commitment, c) locus of control was negatively related to organizational commitment, and d) perceived organizational support was more strongly related to increased organizational commitment for external locus of control individuals than for internal locus of control individuals.
Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji hubungan antara persepsi tentang dukungan organisasi dan kepercayaan terhadap pemimpin dengan komitmen organisasi. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan menguji efek moderasi dari locus of control dalam hubungan antara variabel-variabel tersebut. Subjek adalah dosen (N=80) sebuah perguruan tinggi swasta di Yogyakarta yang mengisi empat jenis skala. Hasil analisis regresi menunjukkan bahwa a) terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara persepsi dukungan organisasi, kepercayaan terhadap pemimpin, dan locus of control dengan komitmen organisasi, b) persepsi tentang dukungan organisasi berhubungan positif dengan komitmen organisasi, c) locus of control berhubungan negatif dengan komitmen organisasi, dan d) persepsi tentang dukungan organisasi memiliki hubungan yang lebih kuat dengan komitmen organisasi pada individu dengan locus of control eksternal daripada individu dengan locus of control internal.
Downloads
References
Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 267-285.
Azwar, S. (1999). Metode penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Blau, G. J. (1987). Locus of control as a potential moderator of the turnover process. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 60, 21-29.
Cardona, P., & Elola, A. (2003). Trust in management: The effect of managerial trustworthy behavior and reciprocity. Working Paper. University of Navarra.
Cardona, P., Lawrence, B. S., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). The influence of social and work exchange relationship on organizational citizenship behavior. Working Paper. University of Navarra.
Coleman, D. F., Irving, G. P., & Cooper, C. L. (1999). Another look at the locus of control organizational commitment relationship: It depends on the form of commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 995-1001.
Dessler, G. (2001). How to earn your employee’s motivation. In J. S.Osland, D.A. Kolb, & I. M. Rubin (Eds.), The Organizational Behavior Reader (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Dirks, K. T.,& Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611-628.
Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P.D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42-51.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P.M., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Effects of perceived organizational support on employee diligence, innovation, and commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 1-59.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
Haslam, S. A (2001). Psychology in organization: The social identity approach. London: Sage Publications.
Hughes, R. L., Ginnett, R. C., & Curphy, G. J. (1999). Leadership: Enhancing the lesson of experience. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Irving, P. G., Coleman, D. F., & Cooper, C. (1997). Further assessments of a three-component model of occupational commitment: generalizability and differences across occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 444-452.
Kline, C. J., & Peters, L. H. (1991). Behavioral commitment and tenure of new employees: A replication and extension. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 194-204.
Konovsky, M. A., & Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship behavior and social exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 656-669.
LePine, J. A., Erez, A., & Johnson, D. E. (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 52-65.
Liou, K. T. (1995). Understanding employee commitment in the public organizations: A study of the juvenile detention center. International Journal of Public Administration, 18, 1269- 1295.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171-194.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
Miner, J. B. (1988). Organizational behavior: Performance and productivity. New York: Random House, Inc.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492-499.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R.S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
Sanders, K., Nauta, A., & Koster, F. (2003). Commitment to the organization: The influence of satisfaction with the type and extent of the labor contract. Research Report. University of Tilburg.
Scholl, R. W. (1981). Differentiating organizational commitment from expectancy as a motivating force. Academy of Management Review, 6, 589-599.
Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R.C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applie Psychology, 81, 219-227.
Shamir, B., & Lapidot, Y. (2003). Trust in organizational superiors: Systemic and collective considerations. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569-598
Somers, M. J. (1995). Organizational commitment, turnover, and absenteeism: An examination of direct and interaction effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 49-58.
Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organization as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482-497.
Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 341-346.
Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1983). Motivation and work behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
