Menelusuri Dinamika Pemaknaan Keselamatan Kerja Pada Industri High Risk
DOI:
Abstract Views:
0 times
PDF-Full Text Downloads:
0 times
Abstract
In order to face the globalization era, work safety become a basic need for an industry to maintain its existence and be competitive. Organizations have to choose between prioritizing safety, assuring productivity, or running production safely. This research was aimed to explore issues related to work safety, obtain clear and detailed view on the meaning of work safety, its background, and its implications. This study apply an explorative phenomenologic approach, with stratified purposive sampling. Subjects (N = 6) were workers from three departments of a Company, each represented by 1 managerial and 1 non-managerial worker.Results indicate that the work safety dynamics of the 3 groups reveal differences and one similarity. The differences were related to safety determinants, attitude, and behavior toward safety, while the similarity was the acceptance of the company’s safety committee—the Environment Protection and Work Health Safety Department—as the key agent of organizational work safety.
Keselamatan kerja merupakan kebutuhan dasar setiap industri agar dapat bertahan dan kom- petitif menghadapi era persaingan global. Organisasi dihadapkan pada pilihan; memprioritaskan kese- lamatan, menekankan produktivitas, atau menjalankan produksi dengan selamat. Penelitian ini bertu- juan mengeksplorasi berbagai isu terkait keselamatan kerja, sekaligus mendapat gambaran konkret dan mendalam mengenai makna keselamatan kerja, hal-hal yang mendasari, dan hasil pemaknaan. Pe- nelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksploratif fenomenologis, dengan stratified purposeful sampling. Subjek (N = 6) berasal dari 3 bagian sebuah PT yang tiap bagiannya diwakili seorang karyawan ma- najerial dan seorang karayawan non-manajerial. Hasil-hasil menunjukkan bahwa dinamika keselama- tan kerja ketiga kelompok mengandung beberapa perbedaan dan persamaan. Perbedaan terletak pada determinan, sikap, dan perilaku terhadap keselamatan. Persamaannya adalah dimaknainya safety committee perusahaan, yaitu bagian LK3 sebagai agen kunci keselamatan kerja organisasi.
Downloads
References
Cooper, M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36(2),111-136. Retrieved August 15, 2005, from www.behavioral-safety.com/articles/Towards_A_Model_Of_Safety_Culture
Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donelly, Jr., J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2003). Organizations: behavior, structure, processes. The McGraw- Hill Companies, Inc.
Hudson, P. (2001). Safety management and safety culture: The long, hard, and winding road. Retrieved August 4, 2005, from http://qshc.bmj.com/cgi
Larsson, S. (2005). Constructing safety: Influence of safety climate and psychological climate on safety behaviour in construction industry. Retrieved March 17, 2006, from http://www.arbetslivs-institutet.se/pdf/050425_Larsson.pdf
Maierhofer, N. I., Griffin, M. A., & Sheehan, M. (2000). Linking manager values and behavior with employee values and behavior: A study of values and safety in the hairdressing industry. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 417-427.
Neal, A., & Griffin, M. (2000). Safety climate and safety behavior. Retrieved February 16, 2005, from http://www.agsm.unsw.edu.au/eajm/0209/pdf/neal.pdf
O’Dhea, A., & Flin, R. (2003). The role of managerial leadership in determining workplace safety outcomes. HSE Books. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.gsi.gov.uk
Osman, L. M., Adie, W., & McPhilJ, J. C. (2003). Attitudes to safety culture among professional divers and offshore workers. HSE Books. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.gsi.gov.uk
Petersen, D. C. (1971). Techniques of safety manager. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha, Ltd. Sorensen, J. N. (2002). Safety Culture: A survey of the state-of-the-art. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 76, 189-204.
Vredenburgh, A.G. (2002). Occupational safety: Which management practice are most effective in reducing employee injury rates?. Journal of Safety Research, 33, 259-276.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
