Rekonstruksi Budaya Hukum Berdimensi Pancasila dalam Upaya Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia

  • Anajeng Esri Edhi Mahanani UPN "Veteran" Jawa Timur
Abstract Views: 3246 times
PDF Downloads: 3243 times
Keywords: “legal structure”, “legal substance”, “legal culture”, “reconstruction”, “Pancasila”

Abstract

The issue of weak law enforcement in Indonesia is indeed not a new issue, but this issue has still not been resolved until now. The purpose of this discussion is to find the ideal law enforcement model in accordance with national values. First, the discussion of this article will look at the correlation between law enforcement and the legal system which ultimately can be concluded that law enforcement always correlates with the optimal legal system at work, namely legal structure, legal substance and legal culture. One of these sub-systems does not work properly and optimally, so the ideals of ideal law enforcement will not be achieved easily.

This paper then discusses the hypotheses of the three law enforcement subsystems, in fact that legal culture being the main factor, namely the determination of other subsystems. A good legal culture will encourage legal structures to form substantive norms and implement legislation with responsibility. Next discussed is the determination of the reconstruction model of legal culture that has the Pancasila dimension. Pancasila in this case becomes a filter in reconstruction the legal culture in order to enforce the law in accordance with the original noble values ​​of the Indonesian nation. Bad habits in the community should not be interpreted as a noble culture of the nation.

 

Keywords: “legal structure”, “legal substance”, “legal culture”, “reconstruction”, “Pancasila”

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku:
Achmad Ali (I). (2002). Keterpurukan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jakarta : Ghalia Indonesia.
__________ (II). (2012). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence), Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Group.
Anthon Susanto. (2010). Ilmu Hukum Non Sistematik “Fondasi Filsafat Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Indonesia”. Yogyakarta : Genta Publishing.
Kaelan. (2010). Pendidikan Pancasila. Yogyakarta : Paradigma.
Lawrence M. Friedman. (2013). Sistem Hukum: Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Bandung : Nusa Media.

Lubis, M. S. (2010). Politik dan Hukum di Era Reformasi, Bandung : Mandar Maju.
Moh. Mahfud MD. (2009). Konstitusi dan Hukum dalam Kotroversi Isu. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
Munir Fuady. (2003). Aliran Hukum Kritis : Paradigma Ketidakberdayaan Hukum. Bandung : PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Purnadi Purbacaraka dan Soerjono Soekanto. (1978). Perihal Kaedah-Kaedah Hukum. Bandung : Alumni.
Saifullah, (2007). Refleksi Sosiologi Hukum. Bandung : Refika Aditama.


Artikel Jurnal:
Ediwarman (2012). Paradoks Penegakan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kriminologi di Indonesia, Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, Vol. 8 No.1 Mei 2012 : 038 – 051, 43.
Iman Pasu Marganda Hadiarto Purba (2017), Penguatan Budaya Hukum Masyarakat untuk Menghasilkan Kewarganegaraan Transformative, Jurnal Civics, Volume 14 Nomor 2, Oktober 2017, 148.
Rif’ah (2015). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia: Sebuah Harapan dan Kenyataan”. Jurnal Justitia Islamica, Vol. 12/No.1, (Januari-Juni, 2015), 40-41.

Artikel Ilmiah:
Arief Hidayat, “Membumikan Konsep Hukum Pancasila (Seminar Pancasila Sebagai Philosophice Gronslag)”, Undip, Semarang, Disampaikan pada acara Seminar Nasional dengan tema,” Menjaga dan Mengaktualisasikan Pancasila Sebagai Philosophiche Gronslag Dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa Dan Bernegara”, yang diselenggarakan oleh Pusat Kajian Konstitusi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 29 Juni 2013, hlm.1.
Published
2019-07-29