Kewenangan Penyidik Menetapkan Rehabilitasi Tanpa Penetapan Pengadilan pada Kasus Penyalahgunaan Narkotika
DOI:
Abstract Views:
359 times
PDF Downloads:
563 times
Abstract
This article reviews criminal justice process in deterring drug abuse case, discussing rehabilitation as a part of criminal sanction and the implementation or existence without court ruling or decision. Several rules and regulations discussed in resolving this matter include Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and Government Regulation Number 25 of 2011 concerning Mandatory Implementation of Narcotics Addict Report. The article was a part of bachelor’s degree thesis, conducted using normative legal study with case approach method. The case discussed is about rehabilitation of drug abuser Without Court’s order. The research finding is investigator do not have authority to place the drug abuser under rehabilitation. It is supposedly by court’s order.
Downloads
All articles published in YUSTIKA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and YUSTIKA, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to YUSTIKA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to YUSTIKA, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.
.jpg)
