Resultan Sistem Pemilu dan Sistem Pemerintahan terhadap Pelaksanaan Demokrasi di Indonesia

  • Anajeng Esri Edhi Mahanani UPN "Veteran" Jawa Timur

Abstract

Problems related to the resultant electoral system and the government system are the focus of the discussion in this study. Types of electoral systems, as well as types of governmental systems are discussed to be able to be a study of the use of electoral systems and government systems. The purpose of discussing this problem is to analyze the electoral system and the government system that are compatible with the implementation of democracy in Indonesia. This research is discussed through normative analysis, and through qualitative methods. The results of the qualitative normative analysis can be seen as follows: First, the results of the analysis show that there is a resultant between the electoral system towards the implementation of democracy in Indonesia as seen from the theory of the people's unity and the representative system. The consultant becomes strong if the general election system used is a purely open proportional electoral system, namely the voter as the supreme sovereignty constitution, can know with certainty who the candidate is and will help determine who is the people's representative. Second, there is a result between the government system and the implementation of democracy, the theory of popular sovereignty and the system of representation. Parliamentary and presidential government systems have their own weak points and strengths. However, the presidential system applied in democratic countries in Indonesia is better, because it tends to be more stable in its accountability. Placing the highest sovereignty as the only party that accepts the responsibility of those who have been elected to the executive and parliamentary institutions. The concept developed is a system of political representation, not as a system of partisan representation .


 


Keywords:  Resultan, District System, Proporsional System, Presidensiil, Parlementary

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku:
Arend Liphart. (1984). Democracies, Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dwi Sulisworo, Tri Wahyuningsih, Dikdik Baegaqi Arif. (2012). Bahan Ajar “Demokrasi”, Hibah Materi Pembelajaran Non Konvensional, Yogyakarta : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Program Studi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan.
I Gde Pantja Astawa. (2008). Problematika Hukum Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia. Bandung : Alumni.
Mariana, D., Paskalina, C., & Yuningsih, N. Y. (2007). Perbandingan Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Miriam Budiarjo. (1985). DasarDasar Ilmu Politik [The Principles of Political Science]. Jakarta: Gramedia.
______________, dan Ibrahim Ambong (ed), 1993, Fungsi Legislatif dalam Sistem Politik Indonesia, Rajawali Press – AIPI Jakarta, Jakarta.
Sarundajang, S. H. (2012). Babak Baru Sistim Pemerintahan. Jakarta: Kata Hasta Pustaka.
Syafiie, I. K. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Pemerintahan. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
___________ & Azikin, A. (2008). Perbandingan Pemerintahan. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Artikel Jurnal:
Aminah, 2012. Analisis Penerapan Sistem Proporsional dan Sistem Distrik dalam Pemilihan Umum untuk Penyederhanaan Sistem Kepartaian di Indonesia ditinjau dari Asas Negara Hukum, Yustisia Vol.1 No. 2, 78.
Muliadi Anangkota. Klasifikasi SIstem Pemerintahan Perspektif Pemerintahan Modern Kekinian, Cosmogov : Jurnal Imu Pemerintahan Vol. 3 No. 2, 151-153.
Published
2020-05-06
How to Cite
MAHANANI, Anajeng Esri Edhi. Resultan Sistem Pemilu dan Sistem Pemerintahan terhadap Pelaksanaan Demokrasi di Indonesia. JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN, [S.l.], v. 22, n. 02, p. 74-83, may 2020. ISSN 2655-7479. Available at: <https://journal.ubaya.ac.id/index.php/yustika/article/view/2388>. Date accessed: 22 sep. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v22i02.2388.