Digitalisasi Sistem Pendidikan Dengan Menerapkan Pembelajaran Hibrida Melalui Rekonstruksi Hukum Menggunakan Metode Cognate Bills
Abstract
The education quality in Indonesia occupied 72nd in every 79 countries according to the programme for international student assessment (PISA) survey in 2018. With literacy, mathematics, and science, Indonesia is still below average. For 18 years of assessment, the scores of students' abilities in Indonesia always under the world standard score. Remote learning carried out by the Covid-19 pandemic provided a paradigm shift for Indonesian education toward digitization. This is rising a new learning concept called hybrid learning. In order to achieve a sustainable hybrid learning to improve the quality of education in Indonesia, there are several legal questions about disharmonizing regulations in Indonesia's education sector. This study purposed to know the application of the hybrid learning as a digital transformation of sustainable education in Indonesia also reconstruction of the laws in Indonesian education through the cognate bills methods in order to promote hybrid learning in Indonesia. This study using the normative legal study that uses secondary and tertiary data sources as support data. Data analysis using statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. Studies indicate that: (1) hybrid learning integrating an interface learning system with online learning as a support tool implemented in Indonesian education systems; (2) the reconstruction of legislation o n the education system in Indonesia through the cognate bills method of accommodating the concept of hybrid learning can be a progressive solution in education transformation. Therefore, with emphasis and centralized effort on the education sector, it is expected to improve the quality of education in Indonesia.Downloads
References
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 48 Tahun 2005 tentang Pengangkatan Pegawai Negeri Sipil
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
Buku:
Ahmad Avenzora (2020). Statistik Pendidikan 2020. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Andreas Schleicher. (2019). PISA 2018: Insight and Interpretations. Paris: OECD.
Hans Kelsen (1978). Pure Theory of Law. California: Berkeley University of California Press.
Stephanie Juwana et al. (2020). Sistem dan Praktik Omnibus Law di Berbagai Negara dan Analisis RUU Cipta Kerja Dari Perspektif Good Legislation Making. Jakarta: Indonesia Ocean Justice Initiative.
Artikel Jurnal:
Argama, R. (2020). Kertas Advokasi Kebijakan Atas UU No 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja, Publikasi Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia. 11, 1–26.
Bibi, Sarah (2015). Efektivitas Model Blended Learning Terhadap Motivasi dan Tingkat Pemahaman Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Algoritma dan Pemrograman. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 5(1), 74-87.
Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let’s get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1-4.
Fauzan & Fatkhul Arifin (2017). Hybrid Learning sebagai Alternatif Model Pembelajaran. Conference: Seminar Nasional: Profesionalisme Guru di Era Digital At: Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Available online from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344361017_Hybrid_Learning_sebagai_Alternatif_Model_Pembelajaran_Fauzan_Fatkhul_Arifin. [Accessed July 9, 2021].
Hwang, A. (2018). Online and hybrid learning. Journal of Management Education, 42(4), 557-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562918777550
Jamilah A. Alokluk (2018). The Effectiveness of Blackboard System, Uses and Limitations in Information Management. Intelligent Information Management, 10, 133-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/iim.2018.106012
Kusumaatmadja, M. (1976). Hubungan Antara Hukum Dan Masyarakat. In Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (Vol. 6, Issue 5, p. 351). doi: https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol6.no5.713
Massoud, Ali, et.al. (2011). Using Blended Learning to Foster Education in a Contemporary Classroom. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 5 (2), 1-11.
Muh. Ali Masnun & Radhyca Nanda Pratama. (2020). Disharmoni Dalam Pengaturan Kurikulum, Pendidikan Pancasila, dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Supremasi, 10(2), 9-18.
Raes, A., Detienne, L., Windey, I., & Depaepe, F. (2020). A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: Gaps identified. Learning Environments Research, 23(3), 269-290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09303-z
Rahmatillah, Hanifah (2013). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Hybrid Learning untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran di SMK. Tesis, Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Safitri, A., Astuti, J., Studi, P., Pendidikan, A., & Muhammadiyah, U. (2003). Keefektifan pembelajaran jarak jauh.
Slamet, K. G. (2004). Harmonisasi Hukum dalam Perspektif Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 11(27), 82–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss27.art8
Soegiyono. (2020). Pentingnya Harmonisasi dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Kajian Kebijakan Dan Hukum Kedirgantaraan, 1–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.30536/9786023181339.1
Subiakto Henri (2013). Internet Untuk Pedesaan dan Pemanfaatannya Bagi Masyarakat. Jurnal Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, 26(4), 243-256.
Artikel Internet:
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Transformasi Pendidikan Tinggi dan Akselerasi Inovasi Perguruan Tinggi di Masa Pandemi – Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Available online from: https://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/kabar-dikti/kabar/transformasi-pendidikan-tinggi-dan-akselerasi-inovasi-perguruan-tinggi-di-masa-pandemi/. [Accessed July 8. 2021].
Mustafa, Sulihin. (2020). Belajar dari rumah melalui pembelajaran jarak jauh di SMA. Available online from: http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/20548. [Accessed July 9, 2021].
OECD. (2019). What Students Know and Can Do: Indonesia. Oecd, 1–10. Available online from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2018-results-volume-iii_bd69f805-en%0Ahttps://www.oecd-ilibrary.org//sites/bd69f805-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/bd69f805-en#fig86. [Accessed July 7, 2021].
PDSI Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika (2021). Siaran Pers No. 139/HM/KOMINFO/11/2020 tentang Bangun Infrastruktur Digital Inklusif, Indonesia Terapkan Tiga Skema Pendanaan. Available Online from: https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/30521/siaran-pers-no-139hmkominfo112020-tentang-bangun-infrastruktur-digital-inklusif-indonesia-terapkan-tiga-skema-pendanaan/0/siaran_pers. [Accessed July 9. 2021].
Prof. Dr. Yuliandri, S.H., M.H (2019). Kedudukan SKB Menteri dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan - Hukumonline.com. Available online from: https://m.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5c401dcce8628/kedudukan-skb-menteri-dalam-peraturan-perundang-undangan/. [Accessed 12 Jul. 2021].
Pusdatin Kemendikbud (2020). Pembelajaran Online di tengah Covid-19, Tantangan yang Mendewasakan. Available online from:https://pusdatin.kemdikbud.go.id/pembelajaran-online-di-tengah-pandemi-covid-19-tantangan-yang-mendewasakan/. [Accessed July 9. 2021].
Rofiq Hidayat (2020). Mencabut Klaster Pendidikan dari RUU Cipta Kerja Dinilai Langkah Tepat - Hukumonline.com. Available online from: https://m.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5f6e1f4c70e67/mencabut-klaster-pendidikan-dari-ruu-cipta-kerja-dinilai-langkah-tepat/. [Accessed July 9. 2021].
Rosser, A. (2018). Beyond access: Making Indonesia’s education system work. Available online from: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/beyond-access-making-indonesia-s-education-system-work#_edn48. [Accessed July 10. 2021].
SDG 2030 Indonesia, (2017). Apa Itu SDGs. Available online from: https://www.sdg2030indonesia.org/page/8-apa-itu. [Accessed July 9, 2021].
Setjen DPR RI (2020). Revisi UU Sisdiknas Bertujuan Sinkronkan UU yang Berpotensi Tumpang-tindih. Available online from: https://www.dpr.go.id/berita/detail/id/32068/t/Revisi+UU+Sisdiknas+Bertujuan+Sinkronkan+UU+yang+Berpotensi+Tumpang-tindih. [Accessed July 7. 2021].
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in YUSTIKA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and YUSTIKA, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to YUSTIKA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to YUSTIKA, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.