Penafsiran Restriktif Atas Pasal 28 Ayat (2) UU ITE
DOI:
Abstract Views:
962 times
PDF Downloads:
847 times
Abstract
The purpose this paper to interpret the content of a law, namely is the regulation regarding the ethics of delivering criticism through social media as regulated in the ITE Law. Article 28 Paragraph (2) of the UU ITE is considered to limit constitusional rights of opinin and expression. The explanation of Article 28 Paragraph (2) transctional and electronic information law is gives different interpretations as fragments of paragraph “spreading informaton” and “causing a sense of hatred/hostility”. This considered an unclear limitation on the right to freedom opinion and expression on social media. The problem in study is how to interpret the restrictive and application the law solving problem of hate speech on social media. The method used in this study, normative juridical approach, is the carried out based on the main legal material by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and laws regulations. It can be concluded in Indonesia a legal state where every action citizens is regulated in laws, the regulatin of submitting criticism through social media which is regulated in Law no. 11 of 2008 UU ITE. The Article 28 Paragraph (2) transactional and electronic information law, gives rise to the vage normen (blurred norms). It is can be abused silencing freedom of opinion and even becoming a political weapon. In the application of this law, it is indicated that there is duplication of criminal acts which are actually vulnerable to legal uncertainty so that it has the potential to cause turmoil in society.
Downloads
References
Buku:
Rahardjo, Agus. (2002). Cyber Crime Pemahaman dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Jurnal:
Azis, Abdul. (2015). Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Informasi yang Menimbulkan Rasa Kebencian atau Permusuhan Melalui Internet di Indonesia (Kajian Terhadap Pasal 28 Ayat (2) UU No. 11 Th 2008 Juncto Pasal 45 Ayat (2) UU No. 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Pakuan Law Review, 1(2), 325-358, doi: https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v2i2.940.
Effendi, Erdianto. (2020). Penafsiran Ujaran Kebencian dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Berdasarkan Beberapa Putusan Pengadilan. Riau Law Journal, 4(1), 23-38, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v4i1.7824.
Kumalasari, Tiara. (2020). Konsep “Antargolongan” dalam Pasal 28 Ayat (2) UndangUndang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE). Media Luris, 3(2), 199-222, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/mi.v3i2.20892.
Permatasari, Amanda Iman, Junior Hendri Wijaya. (2019). Implementasi Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Ujaran Kebencian pada Media Sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Pers dan Komunikasi Pembangunan, 23(1), 27-42 doi: https://doi.org/10.46426/jp2kp.v23i1.101.
Putera, Ryadh Mega dan Krista Yitawati. (2012). Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pasal 28 Ayat (2) UU ITE. YUSTIKA MERDEKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 7(1), 59-65, doi: https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v7i1.69.
Rahmawati , Nur, Muslichatun dkk. (2021). Kebebasan Berpendapat terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Media Sosial dalam Perspektif UU ITE. Pranata Hukum, 3(1), 62-75, doi: https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v3i1.270.
Sidik, Suyanto. (2013). Dampak Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) terhadap Perubahan Hukum dan Sosial Dalam Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmiah WIDYA, 1(1), 1-7.
Internet:
Kementerian PPN/Bappenas. (2018). Isu SARA Jadi Ancaman. Available online from: http://ditpolkom.bappenas.go.id/v2/?p=706. [Accessed July 10, 2021].
LBH Pers. (2020). Vonis Diananta, Sinyal Bahaya Kemerdekaan Pers. Available online from: https://lbhpers.org/vonis-diananta-sinyal-bahaya-kemerdekaan-pers/. [Accessed July 10, 2021].
Ni'matun, Naharian. (2020). Vonis Diananta Adalah Lonceng Kematian Pers Indonesia. Available online from: https://aji.or.id/read/press-release/1095/vonis-diananta-adalah-lonceng-kematian-pers-indonesia.html. [Accessed July 10, 2021].
The Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR). (2017). Tren Penggunaan Pasal 28 Ayat (2) ITE terkait Penyebar Kebencian Berbasis SARA Akan Meningkat. Available online from: https://icjr.or.id/tren-penggunaan-pasal-28-ayat-2-ite-terkait-penyebar-kebencian-berbasis-sara-akan-meningkat/. [Accessed July 10, 2021].
Sukoyo, Yeremia. (2018). UU ITE Ancam Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berekspresi. Available online from: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.beritasatu.com/amp/nasional/521564/uu-ite-ancam-kebebasan-berpendapat-dan-berekspresi. [Accessed July 11, 2021].
Perundang-Undangan:
Undang-Undang Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Pasal 28 Ayat (2).
Putusan:
Putusan MA, Nomor 123/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Ktb.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in YUSTIKA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and YUSTIKA, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to YUSTIKA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to YUSTIKA, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.
.jpg)
