Tipologi Penindakan Kejahatan Korporasi Dalam Korupsi Dana Bantuan Pandemi Covid-19
DOI:
Abstract Views:
649 times
PDF Downloads:
482 times
Abstract
The development of human life nowadays cannot be separated from various aspects such as economy, politics, and technology, including the impact of the coronavirus outbreak (Covid-19 or SARS-CoV-2) which emerged at the end of 2019. Responding to this Covid-19 pandemic outbreak In Indonesia, the government has issued various policies as measures to prevent and handle the spread of Covid-19. One of these policies is to limit community activities. These restrictions have implications for the fulfilment of the economic needs of the affected communities. Responding to the urgency of this community's economic situation, the government held a social assistance program as a measure to ease the community's economic burden. However, the procurement of the program was used as a chance for corruption involving the Ministry of Social Affairs and corporations as the winning bidders. This study uses a qualitative methodology with a normative juridical approach and literature. The approach is carried out by conducting a juridical analysis based on a case approach. The results of the study show that the corporations involved cannot be separated from corporate responsibility. However, the criminal liability process against the corporation is deemed not to reflect justice for the current situation of Indonesia is experiencing. The crime was not carried out in a normal situation but in a situation when Indonesia was trying hard to overcome the urgent situation, the Covid-19 pandemic. Corporate crimes committed by taking advantage of the pandemic situation are deemed necessary to prioritize special action or the weight of criminal acts committed by corporations. The weighting of criminal sanction is the right step as a law enforcement process for corporate crimes during the pandemic.
Downloads
References
Buku:
Ali, M. (2008). Kejahatan Korporasi. Arti Bumi Intaran.
Ali, M. (2013). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Korporasi (Cet. I). Raja Grafindo Persada.
Amrani, H., & Ali, M. (2015). Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Perkembangan dan Penerapan (Cet.I). Rajawali Pers.
Arief, B. N. (1996). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Budianto, A. (2013). Corporate Crime As The Power of Crime.
Harkrisnowo, H. (2004). Transnational Organized Crime: Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi.
Hatrik, H. (1996). Asas Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Huda, C. (2006). Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan. Kencana Prenada Media.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2006). Memahami Untuk Membasmi: Buku Saku Untuk Memahami Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Lamintang, P. A. F., & Lamintang, T. (2010). Hukum Penitensier Indonesia (Ed. II). Sinar Grafika.
Sahetapy, J. E. (1994). Kejahatan Korporasi. ERESCO.
Setiyono. (2005). Kejahatan Korporasi. Bayumedia Publishing.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2007). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Grafiti Pers.
Suhartati, Sahetapy, E. L., & Christianto, H. (2018). Buku Ajar ANATOMI KEJAHATAN KORPORASI.
Suparni, N. (2007). Eksistensi Pidana Denda dalam Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Sinar Grafika.
Suryoputro, G., Riadi, S., & Syaban, A. (2012). Menulis Artikel untuk Jurnal Umum.
Utrecht, E. (1987). Ringkasan Sari Kuliah Hukum Pidana II. Pustaka Tinta Mas.
Yunara, E. (2005). Korupsi dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi: Berikut Studi Kasus. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Artikel Jurnal:
Alhakim, A., & Soponyono, E. (2019). Kebijakan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(3), 322–336.
Burhanudin. (2013). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Korporasi. Journal Cita Hukum, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Hertanto, A. W. (2007). PELUANG PEMULlHAN T1NDAKAN ULTRA VIRES D1REKSI SUATU PERSEROAN TERBATAS. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 37(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol37.no1.147
Hikmawati, P. (2017). Kendala Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Negara Hukum, 8(1), 131–150.
Kinanti, A., Saptono, H., & Mahmudah, S. (2016). Tanggung Jawab Direksi Dalam Tindakan Ultra Vires Menurut UU Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. 5(40), 1–13.
Legowo, B. P. D. A., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2017). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perbankan Dalam Sistem Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(3), 527–546.
Prasetyo, R. T., Ma’ruf, U., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2017). Tindak Pidana Korporasi Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(4), 993–1002.
Puspitasari, I., & Devintawati, E. (2018). Urgensi Pengaturan Kejahatan Korporasi dalam Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Korporasi Menurut RKUHP. Kanun : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i2.10661
Satria, H. (2018). Pembuktian Kesalahan Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Integritas, 4(02), 25–53.
Suardana, I. W., Wairocana, I. G. N., & Jaya, I. B. S. D. (2020). Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar (PSBB). Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 8(9), 27.
Widowaty, Y. (2012). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI TERHADAP KORBAN DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP. 5(2), 154–169.
Yatini. (2019). REFORMULASI KONSTRUKSI PIDANA DALAM MENJERAT PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI. Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS, VII, 144–152.
Artikel Internet:
Putusan Nomor: 8/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst, (2021).
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Ekonomi Indonesia Turun Sebesar 2,07 Persen (c-to-c). Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2021/02/05/1811/ekonomi-indonesia-2020-turun-sebesar-2-07-persen--c-to-c-.html
Nasional, K. P. C.-19 dan P. E. (2021). Peta Sebaran Covid-19. Indonesia. https://covid19.go.id/peta-sebaran-covid19
World Health Organization. (2020). Timeline of WHO. WHO. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#!
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in YUSTIKA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and YUSTIKA, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to YUSTIKA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to YUSTIKA, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.
.jpg)
