Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Match Fixing Sepakbola Indonesia: Analisis Perbandingan Antara Hukum Perancis dan Jerman
DOI:
Abstract Views:
176 times
PDF Downloads:
229 times
Abstract
This research is intended to conduct a legal comparison between Indonesian law with French and German law regarding match fixing in football with the aim of studying the options whether the law in the two countries can be applied to our national law for the improvement of national law. This research is conducted with the type of normative legal research using secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials obtained through literature study. The approach to conducting this norm comparison is included in the micro approach whose focus is the regulation of law. The method used in this research is the functional method, which means that in this research what is compared is the law as it functions and applies in a particular society in a particular place. The result and conclusion of this research find that Indonesia does not have specific regulations regarding match fixing in sports, especially football and Indonesia should be able to make “legal reforms” by regulating the application of the concept of private sector corruption, elements of prohibited actions such as accepting, giving, and requesting gifts, rewards, certain benefits for themselves or other parties that can affect the outcome or process of the match, as well as regulating more severe sanctions related to fines considering the motivation for committing match fixing crimes is financial gain with reference to French and German criminal law.
Downloads
References
Act No. 2010-476 on the Opening up to Competition and Regulation of the Online Gambling and Betting Sector of 12 May 2010
Alfons, Matius. (2019, February 16). Joko Driyono Tersangka ke-15 Kasus Dugaan Match Fixing. Available online from: https://sport.detik.com/sepakbola/liga-indonesia/d-4430852/joko-driyono-tersangka-ke-15-kasus-dugaan-match-fixing [accessed on September 04th, 2023].
Almendo. Mendy Alce. Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Karena Pelaku Tidak Menjalani Pemidanaan, Jurnal Yuridika, Volume 31 No.1, Januari 2016.
Balsam, Jodi S. Criminalizing Match-Fixing as America Legalizes Sports Gambling. Marquette Sports Law Review, Volume 31 No.1, 2020.
Campman, Tyler. Addressing Match Fixing and Corruption in Collegiate Athletics in Light of NCAA v. Murphy, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Volume 36 No.3, 2019.
Diaconu, M. S.Kuwelkar, A.Kuhn. The Court Arbitration for Sports Jurisprudence on Match Fixing: A Legal Update, The International Sports Law Journal, Vol.21, 2021.
Felisiano, Iqbal. Amira Paripurna. Profesionalisme Polri Dalam Penerapan Wewenang Diskresi Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencurian (Studi Kasus Pencurian Kakao, Pencurian Biji Kapuk, Dan Pencurian Biji Semangka), Jurnal Yuridika, Volume 25 No.3.
Foster, Ken. Is There a Global Sports Law, Entertaiment Law, Vol. 2 No.1, 2003.
French Penal Code Article 445-1, 445-2, 445-3, 445-4
German Criminal Code, Strafgezetzbuch – StGB Article 265c dan 265d
Hallman, Kirstin. Severin Moritzer, Marc Orlainzky, Korneliya Naydenova, Fredy Furst. “Match fixing and legal systems. An analysis of selected legal systems in Europe and worldwide with special emphasis on disciplinary and criminal consequences for corruption in sport and match‐fixing”, October 2019
Hardinanto, Aris. Manfaat Analogi Dalam Hukum Pidana Untuk Mengatasi Kejahatan Yang Mengalami Modernisasi, Jurnal Yuridika, Volume 31 No.2, Mei 2016.
Hessert, Bjorn. Chui Ling Goh. A Comparative Case Study of Match-Fixing Laws in Singapore, Australia, Germany, and Switzerland, Asian Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 17, 2022.
Kapardis, Maria Krambia. Michael Levi. Fraud and Corruption in Football: Lessons from a Survey of Match Fixing in Cyprus, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol 30 No.4, 2023.
KEA Affairs, Match Fixing In Sport. A mapping of criminal law provision in EU 27, 2012.
Masters, Adam, Corruption in Sport : From the Playing Field to the Field of Policy, Policy and Society, Vol. 34, 2015
Macolin Convention (The Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competition), 2019
Moriconi, Marcelo. Deconstructing Match-Fixing: Holistic Framework for Sport Integrity Policies. Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol.74 No.1, 2020
Pandjaitan, Hinca, Kedaulatan Negara Versus Kedaulatan FIFA, PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2011
Peurala, Johanna. Match-manipulation in football - the challenges faced in Finland”, International Sports Law Journal, Vol.13, 2013.
Rinaldy. Tawang. Kriminalisasi Match Fixing dalam Pertandingan Sepak Bola di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 1980 tentang Tindak Pidana Suap, Jurnal Hukum Adigama, Vol 1 No.1, 2018.
Serby, Tom. The Council Of Europe Convention On Manipulation Of Sports Competitions: The Best Bet For The Global Fight Against Match Fixing, Int Sports Law Journal, Vol.15, 2019.
Setiadi, Edi. Kristian. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, Jakarta, 2017.
Spapens, Toine. Marjan Olfers. Match Fixing: The Current Discussion in Europe and The Case of the Netherlands, European Journal Of Crime, Criminal Law, and Criminal Justice, Vol.23, 2015.
Steele, S., Opie, Match-Fixing in Sport: Comparative Studies from Australia, Japan, Korea and Beyond Routledge, 2017.
Van Der Hoeven, Stef. Els De Waegeneer, Bram Constandt & Annick Willem, Match-fixing: Moral Challenges for Those Involved, Ethics & Behavior, Vol 30 No.6, September 2019.
Visschers, Jonas. Letizia Paoli, Abhisek Deshpande. Match Fixing: Football Refeerees Attitudes and Experiences, Crime, Law, and Social Change 74, Desember 2019.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in YUSTIKA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and YUSTIKA, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to YUSTIKA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to YUSTIKA, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.
.jpg)
