Efektivitas Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Alat Rekayasa Sosial
Abstract
The rampant corrupt behaviour that occurs in Indonesia is an unfortunate irony to the integrity of the state and legal apparatus. The Corruption Act is supposed to be a guideline for a clean society that is free from fraudulent and corrupt behaviour. Ironically, the current reality proves that the existence of the Corruption Act is not strong enough to eradicate the chain of corruption. Corruption not only undermines state stability but also hinders national development. Furthermore, it is a violation of human rights and the fundamental values that underpin a nation. This article discusses the role of the Corruption Act as a tool of social engineering throughout society, with particular focus on its status as a written rule and in the context of law enforcement of the Act. Furthermore, the purpose of this research is to examine further the application of the Corruption Act from the aspect of substance in the community. Therefore, this research uses a normative juridical approach. Considering that the eradication of corruption is not something as simple as turning the palm of the hand, in the application of the law it is important to implement good collaboration between institutions and the society. Suggestions must be made to strengthen and tighten supervision in law enforcement, and social education for the community on the importance of having awareness of how destructive and destructive corrupt behaviour is.
Downloads
References
Buku
Alatas, Syed H. (1986). Sosiologi Korupsi. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Ancel, Marc. (1977). Essays on Criminal Law and Criminal Policy from an International Perspective. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Baharuddin Lopa. (1992). Kejahatan Korupsi dan Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Barda, Nawawi Arief. (2007). Beberapa Aspek Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Pidana (Menyongsong Generasi Baru Hukum Pidana Indonesia). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip.
Bryan A. Garner (1999). Black’s Law Dictionary. USA: West Publishing.
Chazawi, Adami. (2016). Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada
D. Schaffmeister, et.al. (1995). Hukum Pidana, Terj. J.E.Sahetapy. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Fukuyama, Francis. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Hamzah, Andi. (1986). Korupsi Di Indonesia, Masalah Dan Pemecahannya (Edisi. Cetakan II). Bandung: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Hartanti, E. (2009). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Johnston, Michael. (2005). Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power, and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Klitgaard, Robert. (1988). Controlling Corruption. California: University of California Press.
Koentjoroningrat. (1985). Kebudayaan, Mentalitet, dan Pembangunan. PT Gramedia.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. (1976). Hukum, Masyarakat, dan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. Bandung: Bina Cipta.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar., & Agoes, E.R. (2003). Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Alumni.
Lopa, Baharuddin. (2002). Kejahatan Korupsi Dan Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Buku Kompas
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2008). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara,.
Rodliyah & H. Salim HS. (2020) Pengantar Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
R. Subekti., & R, Tjitrosoedibio. (1980). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita.
Scholten, P. (1954). Struktur Ilmu Hukum. (Penerjemah: M. T. Adisumarta). Jakarta: Bhratara.
Soekanto, Soerjono. (2006). Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sudarto. (2007). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Alumni
Susanti, D. O., & A’an Efendi. (2022). Penelitian Hukum : Legal Research. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Sutherland, Edwin H. (1949). White Collar Crime. New York: Dryden Press.
Umi Kulsum. (2008). Korupsi di Indonesia: Perspektif Sosial Budaya. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Jurnal
Setiadi, Wicipto. (2018). Korupsi Di Indonesia (Penyebab, Bahaya, Hambatan, Upaya Pemberantasan) Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15(3), 249-262.
Muntaqo, Firman. (2011). Hukum sebagai Fungsi rekayasa Sosial dalam Praktek Berhukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 2(1), 71.
Safira, Martha. (2017). Law Is A Tool Of Social Engineering Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia. Kodifikasia, 11(1).
Makalah
A.K, Syakmin. Mengkritisi Pandangan Mochtar Kusuma Atmaja Yang Mengintrodusir Hukum Sebagai Sarana Pembaharuan Masyarakat di Indonesia. Draft Makalah. Tidak Diterbitkan. Palembang. Tanpa Tahun.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia. Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana
Sumber Online
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI. Diakses Pada 24 Mei 2024 dari https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/index/kategori/korupsi-1.html
Intervensi Terhadap KPK Diduga Sudah Terjadi Sejak Lama. (2023). Diakses Pada 22 Mei 2024 dari https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/634764/intervensi-terhadap-kpk-diduga-sudah-terjadi-sejak-lama
Sidak etik skandal rutan KPK, sebanyak 78 pegawai dijatuhi sanksi berat – ‘Komisi ini hancur, harus di-install ulang’. (2024). Diakses Pada 23 Mei 2024 dari https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cll7ey51njno
Tahap Perkembangan Korupsi. (2004). Diakses Pada 22 Mei 2024 dari https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/tahap-perkembangan-korupsi
Treaty Room Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. Diakses Pada 23 Mei 2024 dari https://treaty.kemlu.go.id/search
Sumber Lainnya
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2020). Laporan Tahunan KPK 2019. Jakarta: KPK
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2021). Tanpa Tatap Muka Laporan Tahunan KPK 2020. Jakarta: KPK
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2022). Misi Selamatkan Negeri Laporan Tahunan KPK 2021. Jakarta: KPK
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2023). Menebar Benih Anti Korupsi Laporan Tahunan KPK 2022. Jakarta: KPK
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2023). Berbenah Menutup Celah Laporan Tahunan KPK 2023. Jakarta: KPK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in YUSTIKA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and YUSTIKA, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to YUSTIKA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to YUSTIKA, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.