Strengthening Corporate Crime Prevention In The Digital Economy In ASEAN
DOI:
Abstract Views:
124 times
PDF Downloads:
118 times
Abstract
Economic growth and development in the digital era have presented new challenges in structuring business between countries, especially countries in ASEAN. Relations and cooperation between corporations are no longer limited to being within the scope of one country but across countries. Such conditions certainly produce new threats. In addition to the positive impact on corporations by presenting wider markets and development opportunities in ASEAN countries, economic developments in the digital era are also accompanied by negative impacts. This can be seen from the opportunity to commit transnational corporate crimes, such as corruption, and market abuse by conducting covert monopolies and creating an unhealthy economic climate for market growth by presenting unfair competition between capital owners. Such a situation will certainly damage the spirit of solidarity presented by ASEAN when initiating the MEA. Therefore, it is necessary to have an integrated system between countries in ASEAN that covers cooperation between corporations in preventing corporate crime in the era of the digital economy. Furthermore, the government and society can find out every beneficial ownership behind each of corporate crime. This integrated system will help economic actors, communities, and governments to map out the dangers and opportunities that cooperation between corporations in ASEAN countries can provide. A healthy economic climate can be created by presenting a system acceptable to all parties (government, corporate, and society). This research is focus on enhancing measures to prevent corporate crime within the digital economy across ASEAN countries.
Downloads
References
Ali, M. (2008). Kejahatan Korporasi. Arti Bumi Intaran.
Ali, M. (2013). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Korporasi (Cet. I). Raja Grafindo Persada.
Ariani, N. V. (2020). Beneficial Owner: Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat dalam Tindak Pidana Korporasi. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.71-84
ASEAN. (2020). Overview Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters. https://asean.org/our-communities/asean-political-security-community/rules-based-people-oriented-people-centred/treaty-on-mutual-legal-assistance-in-criminal-matters/
Budianto, A. (2013). Corporate Crime As The Power of Crime. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol10.4.379
Burhanudin. (2013). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Korporasi. Journal Cita Hukum, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
CNN Indonesia. (2022). Deretan Tersangka Kasus Binomo, dari Kekasih Hingga Adik Indra Kenz. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220411074202-12-783003/deretan-tersangka-kasus-binomo-dari-kekasih-hingga-adik-indra-kenz
EUROPOL. (2007). HIGH TECH CRIMES WITHIN THE EU : Threat Assessment 2007. August.
Hatrik, H. (1996). Asas Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Indira Devitasari. (2015). Kekuatan Mengikat ASEAN Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (AMLAT) bagi Negara Anggota ASEAN dalam Rangka Penegakan Hukum Kejahatan Transnasional. Belli Ac Pacis, 1, 25.
Indriati, N. (2009). MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE TREATIES (MLATs) SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PEMBERANTASAN KEJAHATAN INTERNASIONAL. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 9(02), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218588.n105
Kristian, K., & Tanuwijaya, C. (2019). Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Terhadap Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 2(1), 688. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v2i1.564
Kristina, M. (2019). Michelle Kristina_Korporasi Melaporkan Benecial Ownership.pdf. In Prespektif Hukum Bisnis di Indonesia: Kumpulan Catatan Kritis.
Kristina, M. (2021). Tipologi Penindakan Kejahatan Korporasi Dalam Korupsi Dana Bantuan Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum Dan Keadilan, 24(01), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24123/yustika.v24i01.4610
Latifah, M. (2017). Penunjukan Otoritas Pusat Dalam Bantuan Timbal Balik Pidana Di Indonesia. Negara Hukum, 7(1), 53–69.
Mustofa, M. (2001). Kerjasama ASEAN Dalam Menanggulangi Kejahalan Pencucian Uang KEJAHATAN PENCUCIAN UANG LINTAS NEGARA Makalah ini membahas efektifitas kerjasama regional ( Asean ) dalam rangka menanggulangi kejahatan pencucian uang ( money laundering ). Indonesia sendiri b. 4, 357–365.
Naufal, A. I. (2021). PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM BENEFICIAL OWNER (BO) TERHADAP PERSEROAN TERBATAS DALAM MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG. Gorontalo Law Review, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v4i1.1383
Prasetyo, R. T., Ma’ruf, U., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2017). Tindak Pidana Korporasi Dalam Perspektif Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 12(4), 993–1002.
UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 15 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PENGESAHAN TREATY ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS (PERJANJIAN TENTANG BANTUAN TIMBAL BALIK DALAM MASALAH PIDANA), Indonesia (2008).
Ringga, D. S. ., Fadillah, R. N., & Ali, T. (2018). Efektivitas ASEAN+3 dalam Pengakomodasian Kerja Sama Regional Asia Tenggara dan Asia Timur. Jurnal Ilmu Politik Dan Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(2), 119–129.
Risyat, I. A., & Pemasyarakatan, P. I. (2022). Korelasi antara afiliator aplikasi binomo dengan tindak pidana pencucian uang. 9(6), 2997–3003.
Rosana, F. C., & Widyastuti, R. A. Y. (2022). Kepala PPATK: Pemilik Binomo Tak Hanya Satu Entitas dan Berbendera Asing. Tempo. https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1572316/kepala-ppatk-pemilik-binomo-tak-hanya-satu-entitas-dan-berbendera-asing?page_num=2
Sahetapy, J. E. (1994). Kejahatan Korporasi. ERESCO.
Sayoga, V. A. (2022). Pemidanaan Terhadap Affiliator Platform Binomo Di Tinjau Dari KUHP Dan Undang-Undang Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (ITE). Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 20(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.53515/qodiri.2022.20.1.46-59
SETIAWAN, A. (2016). ASEAN ‘Political-Security’ Community: Kerjasama Multilateral & Mutual Legal Assistance Dalam Menangani Kasus Money Laundering Di Asia Tenggara. Anti Corruption Clearing Watch. https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/artikel/riset-publik/219-asean-community-mekanisme-kerjasama-multilateral-dan-mla-dalam-menangani-kasus-money-laundering-di-asia-tenggara
Setiyono. (2005). Kejahatan Korporasi. Bayumedia Publishing.
Simanjuntak, E. L. (2020). PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINTAS JURISDIKSI TERHADAP PELAKU PENCUCIAN UANG DI ASEAN MELALUI MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 8(1), 28–43.
Warsono. (2017). INDONESIA DALAM MENGHADAPI MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN (MEA). Manajemen Dan Bisnis Ganesha, 1(2), 114–133.
Yunara, E. (2005). Korupsi dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi: Berikut Studi Kasus. Citra Aditya Bakti.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All articles published in YUSTIKA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and YUSTIKA, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to YUSTIKA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the CC BY-SA license don't apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to YUSTIKA, authors recognize the rights of readers, and must grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the license.
.jpg)
