PDF

A Qualitative Policy Analysis of the Trump 2.0 Universal Tariff

  • Alana Sabila Department of Economics, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Abstract Views: 46 times
PDF Downloads: 19 times
Keywords: Universal tariff, Indonesia–U.S. trade, Supply chain diversion, Export vulnerability, Trade policy response

Abstract

Purpose: The United States’ April 2025 “Trump 2.0” order— combining a blanket 10 percent tariff with country-specific “reciprocal” surcharges—represents the largest single expansion of U.S. protectionism since the 1930s. For Indonesia, the measure imposes a 32 percent duty on its exports, threatening one tenth of merchandise sales and large segments of Java’s labour-intensive manufacturing. This study provides an early-stage qualitative policy analysis of the shock.

Method: A triangulated research design integrates: (i) comparative historical review of past U.S. tariff waves; (ii) desk analysis of high- frequency customs and freight data through March 2025; and (iii) input–output tracing with the 2021 Indonesian Supply–Use Table to assess import-content vulnerability.

Result: Findings indicate a first-year export shortfall of ~USD 1 billion (0.3 % of GDP), with 55 % of exposure concentrated in HS 85 electrical machinery, HS 61–62 apparel, and HS 64 footwear. A 10 % rupiah depreciation would raise production costs by 4.7 % in West Java electronics and 3.2 % in Central Java garments, given import coefficients of 0.47 and 0.32. Indirect spillovers are significant: China and ASEAN supply 65 % of Indonesia’s intermediate imports and are discounting diverted components, threatening assembly-line utilisation below the 85 % shutdown threshold. Policy resilience requires a five-point package: surplus-management diplomacy, selective MFN concessions on U.S. capital goods, accelerated Asia– Africa market diversification, safeguards against diversion imports, and coordinated macro-financial support for export-oriented SMEs. Future research should combine post-implementation customs data with firm-level panels to measure household income effects and evaluate mitigation efficacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alam, I. A., Singagerda, F. S., & Tuti, H. (2019). Mapping of international trade liberalization and trade balance position in developing country . Opción, 35(Edición Especial Nro. 21), 272–287.

Baldwin, R., & Venables, A. J. (2015). Trade policy and industrialisation when backward and forward linkages matter. Research in Economics, 69(2), 123–131. doi:10.1016/j.rie.2015.02.008

Basuki, Y. T., Arief, M., & Propheto, A. (2015). The role of leadership, dynamic capabilities, and organization culture, in company performance of Manufacturing Industries in Indonesia (study in food and beverages industries). Advanced Science Letters, 21(5), 1141–1145. doi:10.1166/asl.2015.6050

Biro Pusat Statistik, (2025). Statistik Expor Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Semarang, INA.

Biro Pusat Statistik, (2020). (rep.). Tabel Input Output Indonesia 2020 (pp. 1–50). Jakarta, INA: Biro Pusat Statistik.

Birge, J. R., Capponi, A., & Chen, P.-C. (2023). Disruption and rerouting in Supply Chain Networks. Operations Research, 71(2), 750–767. doi:10.1287/opre.2022.2409

Cavallo, A., Gopinath, G., Neiman, B., & Tang, J. (2021). Tariff pass-through at the border and at the store: Evidence from US trade policy. American Economic Review: Insights, 3(1), 19–34. doi:10.1257/aeri.20190536

Chang, P.-L., & Nguyen, P. T. (2020). Made in Singapore. The Singapore Economic Review, 67(06), 1835–1904. doi:10.1142/s0217590820500150

Darby, J. L., Ketchen, D. J., Williams, B. D., & Tokar, T. (2020). The implications of firm‐specific policy risk, policy uncertainty, and industry factors for inventory: A resource dependence perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 56(4), 3–24. doi:10.1111/jscm.12229

Dermawan, W., Azmi, F., Darmawan, I., & Djuyandi, Y. (2024). The contribution of West Java Research and development institutions in post-COVID-19 regional economic recovery through the use of foreign sources. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, 3–24. doi:10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0414

Ding, G., Guo, G., Wu, C., & Yu, J. (2022). China-US trade friction and welfare: The role of regional trade agreements. Economic Modelling, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2022.105877

Dixon, P. B., Jerie, M., & Rimmer, M. T. (2018). Optimality in the Armington, Krugman and Melitz Models. In Trade Theory in Computable General Equilibrium Models (pp. 25–37). essay, Singapore, SG: Springer.

Fathelrahman, E., Osman, R., Hoag, D. L., Sixt, G. N., & Strzepek, K. (2024). Bilateral Trade Welfare Impacts of India’s export ban of non-basmati rice using the global partial equilibrium simulation model (GSIM). Foods, 13(19), 3124. doi:10.3390/foods13193124

Frenkel, M., & Walter, B. (2018). The new American protectionism | Der neue protektionismus der USA. Wirtschaftsdienst, 98(4), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-018-2286-7

Fu, M. M.-Z., Tan, K., Samadi, B., & Rose, A. N. (2025). Spillover Effect of Chinese Export on New ASEAN-5 Stock Markets using Markov Regime Switching Model. International Journal of Advanced Business Studies, 2(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.59857/raod1747

Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2021). Identity Politics and Trade Policy. Review of Economic Studies, 88(3), 1101–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaa031

Guha-Khasnobis, B., & Aditya, A. (2024). Export diversification, quality and Global Value Chain: A cross-country analysis. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 15(03), 1–39. doi:10.1142/s1793993324500212

Gupta, K. (2023). The heterogeneous impact of tariffs and NTMS on total factor productivity for Indonesian firms. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 59(2), 269–300. doi:10.1080/00074918.2021.2016613

Harsani, P., Suhendra, A., Wulandari, L., & Wibowo, W. C. (2020). A study using machine learning with Ngram model in harmonized system classification. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(6 Special Issue), 145 – 153. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12SP6/SP20201018

Jung, Y. S., & Park, Y. (2024). Winners and losers in U.S.–China trade disputes: A dynamic compositional analysis of foreign direct investment. Social Science Quarterly, 105(4), 980–995. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13362

Lyeonov, S., Zhytar, M., Moroz, A., Bokenchina, L., Sitenko, D., Artyukhov, A., & Yehorova, Y. (2025). The role of feed-in tariffs in encouraging insurance companies to invest in renewables. Insurance Markets and Companies, 16(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.21511/ins.16(1).2025.10

Mckinnon, R., & Schnabl, G. (2004). The Return to Soft Dollar Pegging in East Asia: Mitigating Conflicted Virtue. International Finance, 7(2), 169–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1367- 0271.2004.00135.x

Muchtar, M., Rodoni, A., Amalia, E., & Warninda, T. D. (2024). The impact of the Indonesia–OIC countries’ free trade agreement on the halal food sector: CGE analysis. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 16(2), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/jima-03-2023-0075

Purwono, R., Heriqbaldi, U., Esquivias, M. A., & Mubin, M. K. (2021). The US-China Trade War: Spillover Effects on Indonesia and other Asian Countries. Economics Bulletin, 41(4), 2370–2385.

Rahmawati, D., & Redi, A. A. N. P. (2023). Application failure mode effect analysis for risk management in new costumer acceptance project in garment industry with approaching Project Management Body of Knowledge. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Business, 4(3), 167–181. doi:10.24123/jeb.v4i3.5726

Rojas-Vallejos, J., & Turnovsky, S. J. (2017). Tariff Reduction and Income Inequality: Some Empirical Evidence. Open Economies Review, 28(4), 603–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079- 017-9439-y

Rudsinske, J. F. (2023). How unilateral tariffs harm workers under oligopoly. World Economy, 46(9), 2732–2754. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13466

The U.S. Census Bureau, T. U. S. C. B. (2025). (rep.). U.S. International Trade In Goods And Services, December 2024. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/Press-Release/ft900/ft900_2412.pdf

Widyasanti, A. A. (2017). The impact of new trade agenda to macroeconomic performance of Indonesia and Japan in short and long term. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter Dan Perbankan, 20(2), 181–202. doi:10.21098/bemp.v20i2.811

Yanikkaya, H., Tat, P., & Altun, A. (2024). Do Lower Tariff Rates Promote Global Value Chain Participation? World Trade Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745623000289

Zhang, L., Luo, M., Yang, D., & Li, K. (2017). Impacts of trade liberalization on Chinese economy with Belt and Road initiative. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2017.1396504

Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Qu, J., Zhang, B., Zhao, H., Yun, L., Li, T., Niu, P., Nie, F., Hui, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Mesozoic intracontinental deformation of the Alxa Block in the middle part of Central Asian Orogenic Belt: A review. International Geology Review, 63(12), 1490–1520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206814.2020.1783583

Published
2025-10-25
How to Cite
Sabila, A. (2025). A Qualitative Policy Analysis of the Trump 2.0 Universal Tariff. Journal of Entrepreneurship & Business, 6(3), 275 - 288. https://doi.org/10.24123/jeb.v6i3.7893