Profil Gaya Kognitif Empathizing-Systemizing pada Anak Indonesia

  • Ni Putu Adelia Kesumaningsari Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Surabaya, Raya Kalirungkut Surabaya, 60293-Indonesia

Abstract

AbstractThe present study examined Empathizing-Systemizing Theory (E-S Theory) in Indonesian Children. E-S Theory has known as a theory that is attempted to explain the cluster of both the social and non-social features in autism spectrum conditions. Children’s version of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-C) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-C) were administered to 372 Indonesia parents who had typically developed children aged 4-11 years old (boys = 182, girls = 190). The results showed that the girls scored higher that boys on EQ-C . In the case of SQ-C, there were no differences between boys and girls. However, the proportion of cognitive style shows clear individual differences between boys and girls. The proportion of participants with empathizing dominant cognitive sytle was shown higher by girls than boys, which distributed to E and Extreme E brain types, while the proportion of systemizing dominant cognitive styles is higher in boys whom brain types spread across the Type S and Extreme S categories. This study explaining inherited biological factors of autism and  underscore the vulnerability among  boys to develop autism spectrum condition if compared to girls.
Keywords: Empathizing Quotient (EQ), extreme male brain of autism, sex, Systemizing Quotient (SQ)


Abstrak—Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji teori Empathizing-Systemizing (E-S Theory) pada konteks anak Indonesia. E-S Theory dikenal sebagai sebuah teori yang digunakan untuk melihat gugus fitur sosial dan non-sosial kondisi spektrum autisme. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 372 orang tua Indonesia dengan anak berusia 4-11 tahun (anak laki-laki = 182, perempuan = 190), M usia = 7 Tahun, SD= 2.423 yang diminta untuk mengisi skala Empathizing Quotient (EQ) dan Systemizing Quotient (SQ). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bahwa tingkat empati anak perempuan lebih tinggi daripada tingkat empati anak laki-laki. Dalam hal mensistemasi tidak ditemukan adanya perbedaan kemampuan antara anak laki-laki dan perempuan. Namun, proporsi gaya kognitif menunjukkan adanya perbedaan individual yang signifikan antara anak laki-laki dan perempuan. Gaya kognitif dominan berempati lebih tinggi pada anak perempuan, yang tersebar pada kategori tipe otak E dan Ekstrim E, sedangkan proporsi gaya kognitif mensistemasi lebih tinggi pada anak laki-laki dengan tipe otak yang tersebar pada kategori Tipe S dan Ekstrim S.  Hasil penelitian ini memberikan bukti adanya faktor biologis bawaan dari autism ditinjau dari jenis kelamin dan menunjukkan kerentanan bawaan anak laki-laki terhadap kondisi autism jika dibandingkan dengan anak perempuan.
Kata kunci: Empathizing Quotient (EQ), extreme male brain of autism, jenis kelamin, Systemizing Quotient (SQ)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).Washington, DC : Author.

Auyeung, B. et al. (2009) ‘The children’s empathy quotient and systemizing quotient: Sex differences in typical development and in autism spectrum conditions’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(11), pp. 1509–1521. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0772-x.

Baron-Cohen, S. (2002) ‘The extreme male brain theory of autism’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), pp. 248–254. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01904-6.

Baron-Cohen, S. et al. (2003) ‘The systemizing quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 358(1430), pp. 361–374. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1206.

Baron-Cohen, S. (2004) ‘The cognitive neuroscience of autism’, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 75(7), pp. 945–948. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.018713.

Baron-Cohen, S. (2009) ‘Autism: The empathizing-systemizing (E-S) theory’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, pp. 68–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.x.

Baron-Cohen, S. et al. (2009) ‘Talent in autism: Hyper-systemizing, hyper-attention to detail and sensory hypersensitivity’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1522), pp. 1377–1383. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0337.

Baron-Cohen, S. and Belmonte, M. K. (2005) ‘AUTISM: A Window Onto the Development of the Social and the Analytic Brain’, Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28(1), pp. 109–126. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144137.

Baron-Cohen Simon, S. (2010) Empathizing, systemizing, and the extreme male brain theory of autism, Progress in Brain Research. Elsevier B.V. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53630-3.00011-7.

Blakemore, J. E. O. and Centers, R. E. (2005) ‘Characteristics of boys’ and girls’ toys’, Sex Roles, 53(9–10), pp. 619–633. doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-7729-0.

Chakrabarti, B. and Baron-Cohen, S. (2006) ‘Chapter 22 Empathizing: neurocognitive developmental mechanisms and individual differences’, Progress in Brain Research, 156, pp. 403–417. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56022-4.

Connellan, J. et al. (2000) ‘Sex differences in human neonatal social perception’, Infant Behavior and Development, 23(1), pp. 113–118. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(00)00032-1.

Coplan, R. J. and W. M. (2009) ‘Shy and soft spoken’, Infant and Child Development, 18(6), pp. 238–254. doi: 10.1002/icd.

Davis, J. T. M. and Hines, M. (2020) ‘How Large Are Gender Differences in Toy Preferences? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Toy Preference Research’, Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(2), pp. 373–394. doi: 10.1007/s10508-019-01624-7.

Goldenfeld, N., Baron-Cohen, S. and Wheelwright, S. (2005) ‘Empathizing and systemizing in males, females, and autism.’, Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 2(6), pp. 338–345. Available at: nigel@uiuc.edu.

Greenberg, D. M. et al. (2018) ‘Testing the empathizing–systemizing theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain theory of autism in half a million people’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(48), pp. 12152–12157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811032115.

Groen, Y. et al. (2015) ‘The Empathy and Systemizing Quotient: The Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version and a Review of the Cross-Cultural Stability’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9), pp. 2848–2864. doi: 10.1007/s10803-015-2448-z.

Hui, C. H. and Triandis, H. C. (1986) ‘Individualism-collectivism: A Study of Cross-Cultural Researchers’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17(2), pp. 225–248. doi: 10.1177/0022002186017002006.

John, L., Simon, B.-C. and Sally, W. (2004) ‘Empathising and Systemising in Adults with and without Asperger Syndrome’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(3), pp. 301–310.

Johnson, E. S. and Meade, A. C. (1987) ‘Society for Research in Child Development Patterns of Spatial Ability : An Early Sex Difference’, Child Development, 58(3), pp. 725–740.

Kotsopoulos, D. et al. (2019) ‘Individual differences in young children’s visual-spatial abilities’, Early Child Development and Care, 0(0), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1080/03004430.2019.1699918.

Lummis, M. and Stevenson, H. W. (1990) ‘Gender Differences in Beliefs and Achievement: A Cross-Cultural Study’, Developmental Psychology, 26(2), pp. 254–263. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.26.2.254.

Lutchmaya, S. and Baron-Cohen, S. (2002) ‘Human sex differences in social and non-social looking preferences, at 12 months of age’, Infant Behavior and Development, 25(3), pp. 319–325. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00095-4.

Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S. and Raggatt, P. (2002) ‘Foetal testosterone and eye contact in 12-month-old human infants’, Infant Behavior and Development, 25(3), pp. 327–335. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00094-2.
Masters, M. S. and Sanders, B. (1993) ‘Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing?’, Behavior Genetics, 23(4), pp. 337–341. doi: 10.1007/BF01067434.

Park, S. et al. (2012) ‘Sex differences in children with autism spectrum disorders compared with their unaffected siblings and typically developing children’, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), pp. 861–870. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.11.006.

Phallapi, Y. R. et al. (2018) ‘Validity and Reliability Study of the Indonesian Empathy Quotient–Systemizing /Quotient for Children (EQ-C/SQ-C)’, International Journal of Child Development and Mental Health, 6(2), pp. 56–67. Available at: https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/cdmh/article/view/128811.

Quinn, P. C. (2011) ‘Born to categorize.’, in The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development, 2nd ed. Quinn, Paul C.: Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, US, 19716, pquinn@udel.edu: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 129–152.

Stauder, J. E. A., Cornet, L. J. M. and Ponds, R. W. H. M. (2011) ‘The Extreme Male Brain theory and gender role behaviour in persons with an autism spectrum condition’, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 5(3), pp. 1209–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2011.01.008.

Wakabayashi, A. et al. (2007) ‘Empathizing and systemizing in adults with and without autism spectrum conditions: Cross-cultural stability’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(10), pp. 1823–1832. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0316-6.

Witkin, H. A. and et al (1977) ‘Role of the field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles in academic evolution: A longitudinal study’, Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3), pp. 197–211. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.69.3.197.

Wright, D. B. and Skagerberg, E. M. (2012) ‘Measuring empathizing and systemizing with a large US sample’, PLoS ONE, 7(2). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031661.

Zheng, L. and Zheng, Y. (2015) ‘Sex and sexual orientation differences in empathizing-systemizing cognitive styles in China’, Personality and Individual Differences, 87, pp. 267–271. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.014.
Published
2020-10-28
How to Cite
KESUMANINGSARI, Ni Putu Adelia. Profil Gaya Kognitif Empathizing-Systemizing pada Anak Indonesia. KELUWIH: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 2, p. 108-121, oct. 2020. ISSN 2722-1741. Available at: <http://journal.ubaya.ac.id/index.php/soshum/article/view/3100>. Date accessed: 23 nov. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.24123/soshum.v1i2.3100.
Share |