Dampak Globalisasi IPTEK Terhadap Hukum Adat Food Estate di Borneo Merugikan Masyarakat Adat Dayak
Abstract Views:
0 times
PDF Downloads:
0 times
Abstract
The development of Customary Law in Indonesia reflects the evolving social and cultural dynamics in line with the globalization of Science and Technology (IPTEK). This research analyzes the impact of the globalization of science and technology on the development of Customary Law, focusing on its existence through a case study of the implementation of the Food Estate project in the Borneo Forest, Central Kalimantan, which serves as a primary source of livelihood for the Dayak indigenous people. This study employs normative legal research with a comparative approach between countries, particularly Canada as one of the nations that has ratified the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). The research addresses two main problems: (1) how to mitigate the erosion of customary values and Customary Law due to the development of science and technology, and (2) what solutions can be offered to the Dayak indigenous community in addressing crop losses resulting from the implementation of the Food Estate project. The study concludes that the globalization of science and technology has contributed to the erosion of Dayak customary law values in Borneo; therefore, the application of the principle of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) and the protection of indigenous land rights are key to preserving the sustainability of customary law while supporting national food security.
Downloads
References
A. A. Widianto, L. A. Perguna, M. N. Fatanti, M. Alam, & D. Perdana. (2024). Food Estate in Transmigrant Society, Central Borneo: Blessed or Curse? 6-7.
Abubakar L. (2013). Revitalisasi Hukum Adat Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Membangun Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 322.
Agam, S., & Persada, K. (2017). Food Estate: Pangan Melimpah, Harga Lebih Murah | Indonesia Baik. Indonesiabaik.id. Diakses 14 Juni 2024 dari http://indonesiabaik.id/infografis/food-estate.
Bedner, A., & Van Huis, S. (2008). The Return of the Native? Indigenous Peoples and Land Rights in Indonesia. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(4), 520-550.
Colchester, M., & Chao, S. (Eds.). (2013). Conflict or Consent? The Oil Palm Sector at a Crossroads. Forest Peoples Programme.
Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Dan Kehutanan Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Perencanaan Kehutanan, Perubahan Peruntukan Dan Fungsi Kawasan Hutan, Serta Penggunaan Kawasan Hutan. BN 2021/NO 322; PERATURAN.GO.ID: 526 HLM. Jakarta.
Koesnoe, M. (1996). Hukum Adat dalam Alam Kemerdekaan Nasional dan Soalannya Menghadapi Era Globalisasi. Dalam Siti Soendari (Ed.), Ubhara Press, Surabaya, hlm. 5.
Lasminingrat, L., & Efriza, E. (2020). The Development of National Food Estate: The Indonesian Food Crisis Anticipation Strategy. Jurnal Pertahanan & Bela Negara, 10(3), 229.
Li, T. M. (2014). Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Duke University Press.
Maladi, Y. (2009). Antara Hukum Adat dan Ciptaan Hukum oleh Hakim (Judge Made Law). Mahkota Kata, Yogyakarta, hlm. 22.
Mansour, F. (2003). Runtuhnya Teori Pembangunan dan Globalisasi. (Cet. III). Insist Press dan Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, hlm. 46-47.
Nasution, D., & Zuraya, N. (2020). Konsep Food Estate di Kalteng Dipertanyakan. Republika Online. Diakses 14 Juni 2024 dari https://republika.co.id/berita/qbtfct383/konsep-food-estate-di-kalteng-dipertanyakan.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar (UUD) Pasal 18B Ayat (2). LL Sekretariat Negara No.5587. Jakarta.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2012). Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 18 Tahun 2012 tentang Pangan. LL Sekretariat Negara No.5360. Jakarta.
Pemerintah Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) Nomor 82 Tahun 2020 tentang Komite Penanganan Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) dan Pemulihan Ekonomi Nasional. LN.2020/NO.178, JDIH.SETKAB.GO.ID: 22 HLM. Jakarta.
Purnomo, H., & Guizol, P. (2006). Konflik dan Kerjasama Pengelolaan Hutan di Kalimantan Tengah: Perspektif Ekonomi Politik. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 12(2), 37-49.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Negara Hukum yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya. Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, hlm. 49-50.
Resosudarmo, I. A. P., & Yusuf, A. A. (2006). Is the Log Over? The Future of Indonesia's Forests. CIFOR.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Hukum Adat Indonesia. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Sutarto, E. (2008). Perubahan Penguasaan Hutan dan Dampaknya terhadap Masyarakat Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah. Antropologi Indonesia, 82, 49-61.
Van Vollenhoven. (1893). Het Adatrect van Nederland-Indie: Tweede Deel. (Cetakan Kedua). Leiden.
Widyastuti, A. (2020). Manajemen Krisis, Jokowi ke Pemda: Gas dan Rem Betul-betul Diatur. Tempo. Diakses 14 Juni 2024 dari https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1359471/manajemen-krisis-jokowi-ke-pemda-gas-dan-rem-betul-betul-diatur.
