Peran Indonesia dalam Implementasi Prinsip Responsibility to Protect dan Non-Refoulement dalam Krisis Kemanusiaan Etnis Rohingya
Abstract Views:
43 times
PDF Downloads:
14 times
Abstract
The humanitarian crisis experienced by the Rohingya ethnic group in Myanmar has raised a dilemma in the international legal order, between the principle of state sovereignty and international obligations to protect human rights. This article aims to analyze Indonesia's contribution to the implementation of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and non-refoulement principles as two main norms in modern international law, especially in the context of handling Rohingya refugees. With a normative legal approach and literature study of international legal documents, UN reports, and Indonesian foreign policy, this study shows that although Indonesia is not a state party to the 1951 Convention, its practices show the application of the principle of non-refoulement as part of jus cogens. Within the R2P framework, Indonesia plays a role through multilateral diplomacy in ASEAN and the United Nations, as well as initiatives such as Formula 4+1. However, the limitations of the UNSC in acting due to political vetoes and ASEAN's principle of non-intervention are the main obstacles to the collective implementation of R2P. This article concludes that Indonesia's success as a regional actor in this crisis requires a proactive diplomatic strategy, encouraging reform in the UNSC, and consistency in making humanitarian values a priority over political interests. It is hoped that these findings can provide academic contributions to the study of international law and the role of Indonesian diplomacy in handling contemporary humanitarian crises.
Downloads
References
Albayumi, F., Hadi, N. M., & Susilo, D. (2018). Diplomasi Indonesia dalam Menyelesaikan Krisis Pengungsi Rohingya Tahun 2017. In Nation State: Journal of International Studies (Vol. 1, Issue 1).
Alfian, M., & Dewi, R. A. (2023). Humanitarian Diplomacy and Indonesia's Response to Rohingya Refugee Crisis: A Normative and Strategic Analysis. Journal of Human Rights and Global Studies, 6(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.24853/jhrgs.6.1.55
Ali Fikri, A., Mayola, J., & Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, U. (2024). RESPON INDONESIA TERHADAP KRISIS PENGUNGSI ROHINGYA PERIODE 2022-2023.
Andrews, T. (2022). Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar. United Nations Human Rights Council. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4964-situation-human-rights-myanmar-report-special-rapporteur
Estriani, D. (2023). Evaluasi Implementasi Responsibility to Protect (R2P) dalam Konflik Libya Tahun 2011. Jurnal Keamanan Internasional, 7(2), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.24843/jki.2023.v7.i2.p98
Fadilah, F. P., Akmal, M., Hakim, T., Akbar, F., Frefy, P., & Wahyuni, R. (2024). Peran Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Terhadap Etnis Rohingya di Myanmar: Perspektif Responsibility to Protect Concept. 2(3), 247. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11663887
Fatma Putri Fadilah, Moh. Akmal Taris Hakim, Fyo Akbar Putra Frefy, & Ridha Wahyuni. (2024, 05). Peran Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Terhadap Etnis Rohingya di Myanmar: Perspektif Responsibility to Protect Concept. 2. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11663887
Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect. (2020). The road not taken: Failure to protect in Myanmar. https://www.globalr2p.org/publications/the-road-not-taken-failure-to-protect-in-myanmar/
Harris, R. F., Nugroho, I. I., & Assabili, F. (2021). Urgensi Penerapan Responsibility to Protect Guna Menangani Pemerkosaan Sistematik Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Internasional. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 1(2), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipmhi.v1i2.53510
Inas Pratiwi, F. (2018). Lessons Learned from Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in Libya.
Isma, N., 1✉, J., Dziqie, M., Al Farauqi, A., Paramitha, D. I., Muhammadiyah, U., & Timur, K. (2024). Kegagalan Implementasi Responsibility To Protect (R2P) Dalam Konflik Israel-Palestina.
Ismiyatun. (2021). Kajian Hubungan Internasional.
Mardiyanto, I., & Hidayatulloh. (2023). The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Concept as an Attempt for Protection of Human Rights in International Humanitarian Law Context. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 6(1), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7229
Modern Diplomacy. (2020, October 19). China and Russia’s vetoes on Myanmar crisis and R2P. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2020/10/19/china-and-russias-vetoes-on-myanmar-crisis-and-r2p/
Nadia Tia Pramita, & M. Syaprin Zahidi. (2023). Analisa Peranan Indonesia Dalam Pemberian Bantuan Kemanusiaan Terhadap Rohingya Pada Era Jokowi. 5.
Nahlawi, Y. (2025). The Failure of Responsibility to Protect in Syria: A Legal and Political Analysis. Journal of International Humanitarian Law Studies, 12(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/22115757-bja10037
Omezie, I. G., & Ikeanyibe, O. M. (2018). THE UN AND ITS RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT IN SYRIA. In International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Reviews (Vol. 8, Issue 2).
Pane, R., & Desiandri, R. (2023). ASEAN's Normative Constraints in Implementing R2P: The Case of Myanmar. Journal of Southeast Asian Politics, 9(2), 110–125
Paula Ajawaila, D., Hermyn Matulapelwa, A., Stevi Ngongare, dan, Copyright, I., & Ngongare Abstrak, S. (2022). Peranan Indonesia Dalam Kasus Etnis Rohingya Berdasarkan Konsep Responsibility to Protect (R2P) Hal 131-136. https://doi.org/10.52046/jssh.v2i1.131-136
Pison Hindawi, C. (2022). Decolonizing the Responsibility to Protect: On pervasive Eurocentrism, Southern agency and struggles over universals. Security Dialogue, 53(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106211027801
Pusriansyah, F., Wira Perdana, F., Wibisono, Y., & Sri Kelana, dan. (2022). KAJIAN IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP “RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT” (R TO P) DALAM PRAKTIK INTERNASIONAL KASUS GENOSIDA DI RWANDA. 3.
Putri Husni Lily. (2015). RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT SEBAGAI DOKTRIN ATAU NORMA YANG BERKEMBANG DALAM HUKUM INTERNASIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT AS A DOCTRINE OR EMERGING NORM IN INTERNATIONAL LAW. Th. XVII, 65, 151–171. http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/02/18/libya-security-forces-kill-84-over-three-day
Rahayu. (2012). EKSISTENSI PRINSIP RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT’ DALAM HUKUM INTERNASIONAL.
Rahayu. (2022). Eksistensi Prinsip Responsibility to Protect dalam Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Hukum Internasional Indonesia, 4(2), 180–197.
Rameliah, D. R., & Sagena, U. W. (2023). Krisis Keamanan Manusia Di Myanmar dan Penerapan Konsep Responsibility to Protect. www.quora.com
Ramesh Thakur. (2016). The Responsibility to Protect at 15. 92.
Rum, M. (2020). Responsibility to Protect dan Peran ASEAN dalam Krisis Kemanusiaan Myanmar. Jurnal Politik Global, 5(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpg.v5i1.12092
Salsabila, N., & Ridwan, W. (2023). Peran International Organization for Mitigation (IOM) dalam Menangani Krisis Kemanusiaan Etnis Rohingya di Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.24853/independen.4.1.40--49
Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).
Subramanian, S. R. (2022). UN Security Council and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legal Foundations of the Responsibility to Protect in International Law. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 37(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.471
Tourinho, M., Stuenkel, O., & Brockmeier, S. (2016). Responsibility while protecting: Reforming R2P implementation. Global Society, 30(1), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2015.1094452
UN News. (2022, December 21). Security Council adopts first-ever resolution on Myanmar. https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/12/1131892
