Does board gender diversity play an important role in environmental and corporate performance?
Abstract
This research investigates the impact of Return on Assets (ROA), Debt to Equity Ratio (DER), Sales Growth, and Gender Diversity on Environmental Performance (EP) among 75 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange participating in the PROPER program from 2019 to 2022. The study employs a random effects model. The findings indicate that ROA, DER, Sales Growth, and Gender Diversity significantly influence EP. Specifically, Firm Size (FZ) moderates the impact of DER on EP. However, Firm Size does not significantly moderate the effects of ROA, Sales Growth, and Gender Diversity on EP. The research provides insights into factors contributing to the financial performance of companies and the moderating role of firm size. The novelty of the study lies in the moderating role of firm size in the relationship between ROA, DER, Sales Growth, and Gender Diversity with environmental performance. The research contributes to legitimacy, stakeholder, and agency theories. Policymakers can leverage these insights to formulate strategies that encourage corporate sustainability. This study offers valuable information for companies aiming to enhance both environmental and financial performance, ultimately contributing to broader societal well-being.
Downloads
References
Abed, E. C., Schudson, Z. C., Gunther, O. D., Beischel, W. J., & van Anders, S. M. (2019). Sexual and Gender Diversity Among Sexual and Gender/Sex Majorities: Insights via Sexual Configurations Theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48(5), 1423–1441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1340-2
Aigbedo, H. (2021). An empirical analysis of the effect of financial performance on environmental performance of companies in global supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278.
Ajmal, M. M., Khan, M., Hussain, M., & Helo, P. (2018). Conceptualizing and incorporating social sustainability in the business world. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 25(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2017.1408714
Alazzani, A., Hassanein, A., & Aljanadi, Y. (2017). Impact of Gender Diversity on Social and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Malaysia. Corporate Governance.
Alboiu, V., & Walker, T. R. (2019). Pollution, management, and mitigation of idle and orphaned oil and gas wells in Alberta, Canada. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191(10). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7780-x
Ali, M., Gan, C., & Nadeem, M. (2023). A CEO’s expertise power and bank diversification. Accounting & Finance, 63(4), 3815–3840. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13070
Alshuwaikhat, H., & Abubakar, I. (2008). An integrated approach to achieving campus sustainability: Assessment of the current campus environmental management practices. Proceedings of the 4th International Barcelona Conference on Higher Education, 7.
Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability Practices and Corporate Financial Performance: A Study Based on the Top Global Corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1063-y
Arhinful, R., & Radmehr, M. (2023). The Impact of Financial Leverage on the Financial Performance of the Firms Listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231204099
Arvirianty, A. (2019). Chevron Raja Sumbang Limbah B3 di RI, Capai 27 Ribu Ton. CNBC Indonesia.
Aʇan, Y., Kuzey, C., Acar, M. F., & Açikgöz, A. (2016). The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1872–1881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.090
Azzone, G., Noci, G., Manzini, R., Welford, R., & Young, C. W. (1996). DEFINING ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: AN INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK. Business Strategy and the Environment.
Baboukardos, D. (2018). The valuation relevance of environmental performance revisited: The moderating role of environmental provisions. The British Accounting Review.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bassetti, T., Blasi, S., & Sedita, S. R. (2021). The management of sustainable development: A longitudinal analysis of the effects of environmental performance on economic performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2607
Berger-Walliser, G., & Scott, I. (2018). Redefining corporate social responsibility in an era of globalization and regulatory hardening. American Business Law Journal, 55(1), 167–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12119
Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1485–1499. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1762
Bogdan, V., Popa, D.-N., Beleneşi, M., Rus, L., & Scorțe, C.-M. (2023). Gender Diversity and Business Performance Nexus: A Synoptic Panorama Based on Bibliometric Network Analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031801
Brammer, S. J., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00597.x
Burkhardt, K., Nguyen, P., & Poincelot, E. (2020). Agents of change: Women in top management and corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
Ciriyani, N. K., & Putra, I. M. P. D. (2016). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, dan Umur Perusahaan pada Pengungkapan Informasi Lingkungan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, Vol.17.3, 2091–2119.
Cooper, D., & Schindler, P. (2014). Business research methods, The McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series in Operations and Decision Sciences, twelfthedition.
Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003
Decarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. (1999). The Impact of Stocks and Flows of Organizational Knowledge on Firm Performance : An Empirical Investigation of the Biotechnology Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10), 953–968.
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal.
Devie, D., Kamandhanu, J., Tarigan, J., & Hatane, S. E. (2019). Do environmental performance and disclosure bring financial outcome? Evidence from Indonesia. World Review of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 15(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1504/WRSTSD.2019.098681
Dikah Tri Handayani, E., & Wahyudin, A. (2020). The Role of Financial Performance in Increasing Environmental Performance with Firm Size as Moderating Variable. Accounting Analysis Journal, 9(3), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v9i3.42093
Effendi, R., Sayekti, Y., & Wijayanti, R. R. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat pengungkapan tanggung jawab lingkungan dalam laporan tahunan. Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 11(2), 19–32.
Eliason, M. J., & Schope, R. (2007). Shifting sands or solid foundation? Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender identity formation. The Health of Sexual Minorities, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-31334-4
Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., Elamer, A. A., & Zhang, Q. (2019). A study of environmental policies and regulations, governance structures, and environmental performance: the role of female directors. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1), 206-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2250
Escrig-Olmedo, E., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., & Rivera-Lirio, J. M. (2017). Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance: A Methodology for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1904
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017). Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1939
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26.
Fang, C., & Zhang, J. (2018). Performance of green supply chain management: A systematic review and meta analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 1064–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.171
Fatchan, I. N., & Trisnawati, R. (2018). PENGARUH GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PADA HUBUNGAN ANTARA SUSTAINABILITY REPORT DAN NILAI PERUSAHAAN (Studi Empiris Perusahaan Go Public di Indonesia Periode 2014-2015). Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 1(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v1i1.1954
Ferrary, M., & Déo, S. (2023). Gender diversity and firm performance: when diversity at middle management and staff levels matter. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(14), 2797–2831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2022.2093121
Foroudi, P., Hafeez, K., & Foroudi, M. M. (2017). Evaluating the impact of corporate logos towards corporate reputation: A case of Persia and Mexico. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 20(2), 158–180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-05-2015-0043
Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics.
Fujii, H., Iwata, K., Kaneko, S., & Managi, S. (2012). Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1747
Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management and Organization, 17(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1833367200001693
Gallego-Sosa, C., Fernández-Torres, Y., & Gutiérrez-Fernández, M. (2020). Does gender diversity affect the environmental performance of banks? Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310172
Gang, K., Eun, J., & Choi, B. (2023). Shareholder reactions to corporate label change: evidence from South Korean firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics.
García-Gómez, C. D., Demir, E., Chen, M.-H., & Díez-Esteban, J. M. (2021). Understanding the effects of economic policy uncertainty on US tourism firms’ performance. Tourism Economics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816620983148
Gatti, L., Seele, P., & Rademacher, L. (2019). Grey zone in – greenwash out. A review of greenwashing research and implications for the voluntary-mandatory transition of CSR. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-019-0044-9
Glass, C., Cook, A., & Ingersoll, A. R. (2015). Do Women Leaders Promote Sustainability? Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Governance Composition on Environmental Performance.
Guping, C., Sial, M. S., Wan, P., Badulescu, A., Badulescu, D., & Brugni, T. V. (2020). Do Board Gender Diversity and Non-Executive Directors Affect CSR Reporting? Insight from Agency Theory Perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208597
Haninun, H., Lindrianasari, L., & Denziana, A. (2018). The effect of environmental performance and disclosure on financial performance. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 11(1–2), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTGM.2018.092471
Hardiyansah, M., Agustini, A. T., & Purnamawati, I. (2021). The Effect of Carbon Emission Disclosure on Firm Value: Environmental Performance and Industrial Type. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no1.123
Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2018). Governing online platforms: From contested to cooperative responsibility. Information Society, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391913
Hidayat, W. W. (2019). Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Return on Equity dan Leverage terhadap Nilai Perusahaan pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia. Fakultas Ekonomi, 21(1), 67–75.
Holly, A., Mardiana, A., Jao, R., Tangke, P., & The, I. (2023). Pengaruh Environmental Performance Dan Environmental Disclosure Terhadap Financial Performance. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Aksioma, 22(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.29303/aksioma.v22i1.193
Horváthová, E. (2012). The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits? Ecological Economics.
Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. a. (1999). management : Swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management, 25(3), 417–456.
Humayra, S., Subha, S., Anwar, M., Kabir, M. N., Tahat, Y. A., & Hossain, M. (2023). Environmental Performance and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Japan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043273
Hummel, K. (2016). The Relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy theory The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure – Reconciling voluntary dis. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35, 455–476.
Ifada, L. M., & Jaffar, R. (2023). Does Environmental Cost Expenditure Matter? Evidence from Selected Countries in the Asia-Pacific Region. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054322
Ilinitch, A. Y., Soderstrom, N. S., & E. Thomas, T. (1998). Measuring corporate environmental performance. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 17(4–5), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(98)10012-1
Islam, M. Z., & Wang, S. (2023). Exploring the unique characteristics of environmental sustainability in China: Navigating future challenges. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 21(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjpre.2023.03.004
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jizi, M. (2017). The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure: Board Composition and Sustainable Development Disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 0–33.
Jo, H., Kim, H., Lee, B.-S., & Park, K. (2013). Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Financial Performance Around the World. KAIST College of Business Working Paper Series.
Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a “Critical Mass?” Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1553-6
Ju, S., Andriamahery, A., Qamruzzaman, M., & Kor, S. (2023). Effects of financial development, FDI and good governance on environmental degradation in the Arab nation: Does technological innovation matters? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11(March), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1094976
Kassinis, G., Panayiotou, A., Dimou, A., & Katsifaraki, G. (2016). Gender and Environmental Sustainability: A Longitudinal Analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
Khattak, M. A. (2021). Corporate Sustainability and Financial Performance of Banks in Muslim Economies: The Role of Institutions. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2156
Kim, T. H., & Kim, B. (2018). Firm’s Environmental Expenditure, R&D Intensity, and Profitability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10062071
Klarin, T. (2018). The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 21(1), 67–94. https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2018-0005
Konadu, R., Ahinful, G. S., Boakye, D. J., & Elbardan, H. (2022). Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121279
Küçükbay, F., & Fazlılar, A. (2016). The Relationship between Firms’ Environmental Performance and Financial Performance: The Case of Turkey. International Conference on Eurasian Economies 2016, 2009, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.36880/c07.01742
Kusuma, M. (2021). Measurement of Return on Asset (ROA) based on Comprehensive Income and its Ability to Predict Investment Returns: an Empirical Evidence on Go Public Companies in Indonesia before and during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Ekuilibrium : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi, 16(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.24269/ekuilibrium.v16i1.3238
Kuzior, A., Ober, J., & Karwot, J. (2021). Stakeholder Expectation of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices: A Case Study of PWiK Rybnik, Poland. Energies, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113337
Kyaw, K., Treepongkaruna, S., & Jiraporn, P. (2022). Board gender diversity and environmental emissions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 2871–2881. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3052
Laporte, M., Reny-Nolin, E., Chouinard, V., Hernandez, C., Normandeau, E., Bougas, B., Côté, C., Behmel, S., & Bernatchez, L. (2021). Proper environmental DNA metabarcoding data transformation reveals temporal stability of fish communities in a dendritic river system. Environmental DNA, 3(5), 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.224
Lee, K.-H., Cin, B., & Lee, E. Y. (2014). Environmental Responsibility and Firm Performance: The Application of an Environmental, Social and Governance Model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1855
Lee, M. T., & Raschke, R. L. (2023). Stakeholder legitimacy in firm greening and financial performance: What about greenwashing temptations? Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113393
Leonidou, L. C., Christodoulides, P., Kyrgidou, L. P., & Palihawadana, D. (2017). Erratum to: Internal Drivers and Performance Consequences of Small Firm Green Business Strategy: The Moderating Role of External Forces (Journal of Business Ethics, (2017), 140, 3, (585-606), 10.1007/s10551-015-2670-9). Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2721-2
Li, J., Zhao, F., Chen, S., Jiang, W., Liu, T., & Shi, S. (2016). Gender Diversity on Boards and Firms’ Environmental Policy. Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE).
Liao, H., Joshi, A., & Chuang, A. (2004). Sticking Out Like a Sore Thumb: Employee Dissimilarity and Deviance at Work. Personnel Psychology, 57(4), 969–1000. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00012.x
Lidyana, V. (2022). Perusahaan Tambang KPUC Cemari Lingkungan, Izinnya Dicabut? IDN Times.
Lie, D. (2018). Variables Affected on Economic Performance. European Union Digital Library.
Lindawati, A. S. L., & Puspita, M. E. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: Implikasi Stakeholder dan Legitimacy Gap dalam Peningkatan Kinerja Perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 157–174. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2015.04.6013
Liu, C. (2018). Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52(August), 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08.004
López-Toro, A. A., Sánchez-Teba, E. M., Benítez-Márquez, M. D., & Rodríguez-Fernández, M. (2021). Influence of ESGC indicators on financial performance of listed pharmaceutical companies alberto. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094556
Lu, J., & Herremans, I. M. (2019). Board gender diversity and environmental performance: An industries perspective. Business Accounting Review. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2326
Lu, J., & Wang, J. (2021). Corporate governance, law, culture, environmental performance and CSR disclosure: A global perspective. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 70, 101264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101264
Lucas, M. T., & Noordewier, T. G. (2016). Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: The moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors. International Journal of Production Economics, 175, 24–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.02.003
Ma, Y., Zhang, Q., Yin, Q., & Wang, B. (2019). The influence of top managers on environmental information disclosure: The moderating effect of company’s environmental performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071167
Martín, C. J. G., & Herrero, B. (2019). Do board characteristics affect environmental performance? A study of EU firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
Massaro, L., Calvimontes, J., Ferreira, L. C., & de Theije, M. (2022). Balancing economic development and environmental responsibility: Perceptions from communities of garimpeiros in the Brazilian Amazon. Resources Policy, 79(September), 103063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103063
Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Ozanne, L. (2022). The Interactive Effect of Internal and External Factors on a Proactive Environmental Strategy and its Influence on a Firm’s Performance. Journal of Business Ethics.
Miola, L., Muffato, V., Pazzaglia, F., & Meneghetti, C. (2023). Men’s and women’s egocentric and allocentric knowledge: The involvement of mental rotation ability and spatial beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(February), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130549
Monroe, K., Ozyurt, S., Wrigley, T., & Alexander, A. (2008). Gender equality in academia: Bad news from the trenches, and some possible solutions. Perspectives on Politics, 6(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592708080572
Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., & May, P. H. (2010). Reconciling theory and practice : An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services ☆. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1202–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006
Mustikawati, A., & Cahyonowati, N. (2015). Pengaruh Asimetri Informasi Terhadap Manajemen Laba dengan Ukuran Perusahaan sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 4(4), 1–8.
Nguyen, T. H. H., Elmagrhi, M. H., Ntim, C. G., & Wu, Y. (2021). Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. 2313–2331. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2748
Nguyen, T. H., Vu, Q. T., Nguyen, D. M., & Le, H. L. (2021). Factors Influencing Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Its Impact on Financial Performance: The Case of Vietnam. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(15), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158197
Nie, C., Luo, W., & Feng, Y. (2023). The Impact of Economic Growth Target Constraints on Environmental Pollution : Evidence from China.
Nielsen, M. W., & Börjeson, L. (2019). Gender diversity in the management field: Does it matter for research outcomes? Research Policy.
Nisar, Q. A., Haider, S., Ali, F., Jamshed, S., Ryu, K., & Gill, S. S. (2021). Green human resource management practices and environmental performance in Malaysian green hotels: The role of green intellectual capital and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127504
Nukala, V. B., & Rao, S. S. P. (2021). Role of debt-to-equity ratio in project investment valuation, assessing risk and return in capital markets. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00058-9
O.Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12860
Odalo, S., Achoki, G., & Njuguna, A. (2016). Relating Company Size and Financial Performance in Agricultural Firms Listed in the Nairobi Securities Exchange in Kenya. International Journal of Economics and Finance.
Omran, M. A., & El-Galfy, A. M. (2014). Theoretical perspectives on corporate disclosure: A critical evaluation and literature survey. Asian Review of Accounting, 22(3), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-01-2014-0013
Owen, J. R., & Kemp, D. (2013). Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resources Policy, 38(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.016
Park, S., & Doo, M. Y. (2020). The effect of organizational culture and HR practices on female managers’ commitment and job satisfaction. European Journal of Training and Development.
Partiti, E. (2020). Regulating trade in forest-risk commodities. Journal of World Trade, 54(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3406718
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. Van Der. (1995). Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate Green and Competitive. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120–134.
Post, C., Rahman, N., & McQuillen, C. (2015). From Board Composition to Corporate Environmental Performance Through Sustainability-Themed Alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7
Puspitasari, E., Sudiyatno, B., Suharmanto, T., & Setyawati, D. (2019). Kinerja Keuangan, Kinerja Lingkungan, Struktur Kepemilikan dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Pengungkapan Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan Pertambangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Proceeding Seminar Nasional & Call For Papers, September, 139–145.
Radhouane, I., Nekhili, M., Nagati, H., & Paché, G. (2018). The impact of corporate environmental reporting on customer-related performance and market value. Management Decision.
Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board Composition and Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Diversity, Gender, Strategy and Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5
Ren, S., Tang, G., & E. Jackson, S. (2018). Green human resource management research in emergence: A review and future directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(3), 769–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9532-1
Rinsman, T. C. S., & Prasetyo, A. B. (2020). The Effects of Financial and Environmental Performances on Firm Value with Environmental Disclosure as an Intervening Variable. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi, 12(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v12i2.24003
Rokhmawati, A., Sathye, M., & Sathye, S. (2015). The Effect of GHG Emission, Environmental Performance, and Social Performance on Financial Performance of Listed Manufacturing Firms in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(September), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.061
Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Chong, T. (2019). Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a firm’s environmental performance for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2277
Ruan, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Environmental, social, governance activities and firm performance: evidence from China. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020767
Rusmana, O., & Tanjung, H. (2020). Identifikasi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Fraud Pentagon Studi Empiris Bumn Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.32424/jeba.v21i4.1545
Sampong, F., Song, N., Boahene, K. O., & Wadie, K. A. (2018). Disclosure of CSR performance and firm value: New evidence from South Africa on the basis of the GRI guidelines for sustainability disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124518
Sandvik, I. L., & Sandvik, K. (2003). The impact of market orientation on product innovativeness and business performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20(4), 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2003.02.002
Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technology centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7), 1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00190-1
Savio, R., D’Andrassi, E., & Ventimiglia, F. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review on ESG during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032020
Schwab, A., Werbel, J. D., Hofmann, H., & Henriques, P. L. (2016). Managerial Gender Diversity and Firm Performance: An Integration of Different Theoretical Perspectives. Group and Organization Management, 41(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115588641
Shocker, A. D., & Sethi, S. P. (1973). An Approach to Incorporating Societal Preferences in Developing Corporate Action Strategies. California Management Review, 15(4), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/41164466
Siregar, M. Y., & Kusumawardhani, I. (2023). Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Political Cost, Tipe Industri, Dan Kinerja Lingkungan Terhadap Environmental Disclosure. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 18(1), 2362–2391. https://doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v18i1.15344
Solovida, G. T., & Latan, H. (2017). Linking environmental strategy to environmental performance Mediation role of environmental management accounting. Mediation Role of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-08-2016-0046
Spaargaren, G. (1997). In Search of a New Approach: Ecological Modernization and the Structuration Theory. In The Ecological Modernization of Production and Consumption: Essays in Environmental Sociology.
Szász, L., Demeter, K., Csíki, O., & Horváth, R. (2023). Technology, lean, quality and human resource practices in manufacturing: how does size as a contingency factor matter? Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.
Tan, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2022). The effect of ESG rating events on corporate green innovation in China: The mediating role of financial constraints and managers’ environmental awareness. Technology in Society, 68, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101906
Tingbani, I., Chithambo, L., Tauringana, V., & Papanikolaou, N. (2020). Board gender diversity, environmental committee and greenhouse gas voluntary disclosures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(6), 2194–2210. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2495
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T., & O’Reilly, C. (1991). Being Different: Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1991(1), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1991.4976867
Utomo, M. N., Rahayu, S., Kaujan, K., & Irwandi, S. A. (2020). Environmental performance, environmental disclosure, and firm value: empirical study of non-financial companies at Indonesia Stock Exchange. Green Finance, 2(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.3934/gf.2020006
Vaktel, C., & Brandsas, L. (2022). How Can Artificial Intelligence Help Prevent Online Sexual Abuse? Master’s Thesis, Handelshøyskolen BI.
Valduga, I. B., Lima, M. A. De, Castro, B. C. G., Fuchs, P. G., Amorim, W. S. de, & Guerra, J. B. S. O. de A. (2023). A Balanced Scorecard Proposal for Gender Equality and Sustainable Development. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(19), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914384
Vilchez, V. F., Darnall, N., & Correa, J. A. A. (2017). Stakeholder influences on the design of firms’ environmental practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 3370–3381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.129
Wang, T., Thornhill, S., & Castro, J. O. De. (2017). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Legitimation, and New Venture Performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(4), 373–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1246
Wang, Y., Wilson, C., & Li, Y. (2021). Gender attitudes and the effect of board gender diversity on corporate environmental responsibility. Emerging Markets Review.
Whittington, G. (2007). Profitability, accounting theory and methodology: The selected essays of Geoffrey Whittington. In Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203968147
Wijaya, D., & Kuang, T. M. (2023). DO INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND ESG MITIGATE ACCOUNTING FRAUD? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 14(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2023.14.2.17
Xie, H., Tian, C., & Pang, F. (2023). Multi-Tasking Policy Coordination and Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20020923
Yang, F., & Li, X. (2023). Corporate Financialization, ESG Performance and Sustainability Development: Evidence from Chinese-Listed Companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15042978
Zaid, M. A. A., Wang, M., Adib, M., Sahyouni, A., & Abuhijleh, S. T. F. (2020). Boardroom nationality and gender diversity: Implications for corporate sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119652
Zhang, F., Qin, X., & Liu, L. (2020). The interaction effect between ESG and green innovation and its impact on firm value from the perspective of information disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051866
Zhao, S., Peng, L., Zhou, H., & Hu, F. (2023). Government-Enterprise Collusion and the Effectiveness of Environmental Regulations: Implications for Public Health. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2023, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3958944
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi (JATI) to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Articles published in Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi (JATI) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- By publishing in Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi (JATI), authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.