FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI GREEN PRODUCT PURCHASE DECISIONS PADA PRODUK PERBEKALAN KESEHATAN RUMAH TANGGA RAMAH LINGKUNGAN DI SURABAYA
Abstract Views:
306 times
PDF - FULL TEXT Downloads:
250 times
Abstract
Abstrak - Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan membuktikan pengaruh supporting environmental protection, drive for environmental responsibility, green product experience, environmental friendliness of companies, dan social appeal terhadap green product purchase decisions pada produk PKRT ramah lingkungan di Surabaya. Pengolahan data penelitian ini menggunakan Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) dengan program Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) versi 18 dan LISREL versi 8.7. Obyek penelitian ini adalah orang yang membeli dan menggunakan produk PKRT ramah lingkungan minimal tiga bulan terakhir. Jumlah sampel dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 185 responden yang diambil dengan pendekatan purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa supporting environmental protection berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap green product purchase decisions, drive for environmental responsibility tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap green product purchase decisions, green product experience berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap green product purchase decisions, environmental friendliness of companies berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap green product purchase decisions, dan social appeal tidak memiliki pengaruh terhadap green product purchase decisions.
Kata kunci: supporting environmental protection, green product experience, green product purchase decisions
Abstract - This research aims to know and prove the existence of supporting environmental protection, drive for environmental responsibility, green product experience, environmental friendliness of companies, and social appeal to green product purchase decisions on environmentally friendly PKRT products in Surabaya.This research data processing using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 18 and LISREL version 8.7. The object of this research is people who buy and use environmentally friendly products PKRT at least the last three months. The number of samples in this study amounted to 185 respondents taken with the approach of purposive sampling.The results of this study indicate that supporting environmental protection has a positive and significant effect on green product purchase decisions, the drive for environmental responsibility has no effect on green product purchase decisions, green product experience has a positive and significant effect on green product purchase decisions, environmental friendliness of companies positively and significant to green product purchase decisions, and social appeal has no effect on green product purchase decisions.
Keywords: supporting environmental protection, green product experience, green product purchase decisions
Downloads
References
Attaran, S. dan Celik, B.G., 2015, Students’ Environmental Responsibility and Their Willingness to Pay for Green Buildings, International Journal of Sustainsibility in Higher Education, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 327-340.
Barber, N., Taylor, C. dan Strick, S., 2009, Wine Consumers’ Environmental knowledge and attitudes: Influence on Willingness to Purchase, International Journal of Wine Research, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 59-72.
Bertrandias, L. dan Gambier, L.E., 2014, Others’ Environmental Concern as a Social Determinant of Green Buying, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 31 No.6/7, pp. 417-429.
Bhuian, S.N., Amyx, D.A. dan Shamma, H.M., 2014, An Extension of Consumer Environmental Behavior Research Among Expatriates, Internasional Journal of Commerce and Management, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 63-84.
Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P. dan Pearo, L.K., 2004, A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation In Network and Small Group Based Virtual Communities, Internasional Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 241-263.
Djatmiko, T. dan Pradana, R., 2016, Brand Image and Product Price; Its Impact for Samsung Smartphone Purchasing Decision, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 219, pp.221-227
Escalas, J.E. dan Bettman, J.R., 2005, Self-construal, Reference Groups and Brand Meaning, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 378- 389.
Essoussi, L.H. dan Linton, J.D., 2010, New or Recycled Products: How Much Are Consumers Willing To Pay ?, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 458-468.
Fornell, C. dan Larcker, D.F., 1981, Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D. dan Smith, T., 2011, The Influence of Consumers’ Environmental Beliefs and Attitudes on Energy Saving Behaviour”, Energy Policy, Vol. 39 No. 12, pp. 7684-7694.
Grier, S.A. and Deshpande, R., 2001, Social Dimensions of Consumer Distinctiveness: The Influence of Social Status on Group Identity and Advertising Persuasion, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38 No.2, pp. 216-224.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J.M. dan Bergh, B.V., 2010, Going Green To Be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 98 No. 3, pp. 392-404.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., 2010, Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Prespective, 7th Edition, Pearson.
Hawkins, dan Mothersbaugh, 2010, Consumer Behavior:Building Marketing Strategy, 11th Edition, Mc Graw Hill.
Joshi, Y. dan Rahman, Z., 2016, Predictors of Young Consumer’s Green Purchase Behaviour, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 452-472.
Kilbourne, W. dan Pickett, G., 2008, How Materialism Affects Environmental Beliefs, Concern, and Environmentally Responsible Behaviour”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 61 No. 9, pp. 885-893.
Kim, H.Y. dan Chung, J.E., 2011, Consumer Purchase Intention for Organic Personal Care Products, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 40-47.
Kotler P., dan Armstrong G., 2008, Principles of Marketing, 12th Edition, Pearson Education.
Kumar P., dan Ghodeswar B.M., 2015, Factor Affecting Consumers’ Green product Purchase Decisions, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 33: 330-347.
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J. and Barbaro-Forleo, G., 2001, Targeting Consumers Who Are Willing To Pay More For Environmentally Friendly Products, The Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 503-520.
Lee, K., 2008, Opportunities for Green Marketing: Young Consumers, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 26 No. 6, pp. 573-586.
Moser A.K., 2015, Thinking Green, Buying Green? Drivers of Pro-environmental Purchasing Behavior, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 167-175.
Nguyen, T.N., Lobo, A. dan Greenland, S., 2017, The Influence of Cultural Values on Green Purchase Behaviour, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 377-396.
Nyborg, K., Howarth, R.B. dan Brekke, K.A. 2006, Green consumers and public policy: on socially contingent moral motivation”, Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 351-366.
Oliver, J.D. and Lee, S. 2010, Hybrid Car Purchase Intentions: A Cross-Cultural Analysis, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 96-103.
Ozaki, R. and Sevastyanova, K. 2011, Going Hybrid: An Analysis of Consumer Purchase Motivations, Energy Policy, Vol. 39 No. 5, pp. 2217-2227.
Papadopoulos, I., Karagouni, G., Trigkas, M. and Platogianni, E., 2010, Green Marketing: The Case of Greece in Certified and Sustainably Managed Timber Products, Euro Med Journal of Business, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 166-190.
Park, J. and Ha, S., 2012, Understanding Pro-environmental Behaviour: A Comparison of Sustainable Consumers and Apathetic Consumers, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 388-403.
Pickett-Baker, J. and Ozaki, R., 2008, Pro-environmental Products: Marketing Influence on Consumer Purchase Decision, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 5, pp. 281-293.
Sen, S., Zeynep, G.-C. dan Vicki, M., 2001, Withholding Consumption: A Social Dilemma Perspective on Consumer Boycotts, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 399-417.
Suki, N. M., 2016, Green Product Purchase Intention: Impact of Green Brands, Attitide, and Knowledge, British Food Journal, Vol. 118 No. 12, pp. 2893- 2910.
Suki, N.M., 2013, Green Awareness Effects on Consumers’ Purchasing Decision: Some Insights From Malaysia, International Journal of Asia-Pasific Studies, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 59-73.
Trivedi, R.H., Patel, J.D. dan Savalia, J.R., 2015, Pro-environmental Behaviour, Locus of Control and Willingness to Pay for Environmental Friendly Products, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 67-89.
van Dam, Y.K. dan Fischer, A.R.H., 2015, Buying Green Without Being Seen,
Environment and Behavior, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 328-356.
Wang, S.T., 2014, Consumer Characteristics and Social Influence Factors on Green Purchasing Intentions, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 32 No. 7, pp. 738-753.
Watjatrakul, B., 2013, Intention to Use a Free Voluntary Service, Journal of Systems and Information Technology, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 202-220.
Wu, H.C., Ai, C.H. dan Cheng, C.C., 2016, Synthesizing The Effects of Green Experiential Quality, Green Equity, Green Image and Green Experiential Satisfaction on Green Switching Intention, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 28 No. 9, pp. 2080-2107.
Zhao, H., Gao, Q., Wu, Y., Wang, Y. and Zhu, X., 2014, What Affects Green Consumer Behavior in China? A Case Study from Qingdao, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 143-151.
Zikmund, William G., 2009, Business Research Methods, South-Western Cengage Learning.
Zuraidah, R., Hashima, H.N., Yahya, K.W. and Mohamad, S.A., 2012, Environmental Conscious Behaviour Among Male and Female Malaysian Consumers, OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 4 No. 8, pp. 55-64.
http://nationalgeographic.co.id/berita/2016/05/air-sungai-di-indonesia-tercemar- berat/2 (diunduh pada 22 september 2017)
http://nasional.republika.co.id/berita/nasional/daerah/17/09/28/owzx0t284-klhk- 75-persen-air-sungai-indonesia-tercemar-berat (diunduh pada 22 September 2017)
http://www.hpli.org/isu.php (diunduh pada 22 September 2017)
https://lingkunganhidup.co/pencemaran-laut-di-indonesia-dan-dampaknya/ (Diunduh pada 22 September 2017)
http://www.kemenperin.go.id/artikel/6891/Regulasi-Industri-Hijau-Disusun (Diunduh pada 22 September 2017)
http://koran-sindo.com/page/news/2017-03 09/0/16/Kualitas_Air_Sungai_di_Surabaya_Masih_Buruk (diunduh 22 September 2017)
http://www.mongabay.co.id/2017/03/29/limbah-yang-mencemari-sungai- surabaya-itu-harus-ditangani/ (diunduh 23 September 2017 )
- Articles published in CALYPTRA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to CALYPTRA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in CALYPTRA, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
