PEMERIKSAAN ULANG ATAS PEMBATALAN KETETAPAN PAJAK SECARA FORMAL
Abstract
Directorate General of Taxes has several times faced the fact that the tax assessments that have been issued have been formally canceled. The purpose of this study is to determine the re-audit procedure for tax assessments that are formally canceled, and the obstacles and solutions in overcoming tax audit problems against audit results disputes. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The results of the study reveal that a tax assessment that is formally canceled can be followed up by a tax auditor, namely in the form of a new audit or a follow-up tax audit. The new tax audit means that the tax audit is carried out with the usual audit mechanism with a different purpose/regardless of the previous tax audit. A new audit is carried out if the cancellation of the tax assessment occurs because it is not true. Advanced audit means to continue the previous process. The obstacles are external and internal factors. External factors include the provision of tax legal remedies, lack of experience, and lack of legal assistance in dealing with disputes over audit results. Internal factors in the form of disciplinary punishment to tax employees who fail to carry out their duties. The solution can be done in terms of regulation and the effectiveness of tax audits.
Downloads
References
Ayalew, E. (2014). Factors Affecting Tax Audit Effectiveness: A Study on Category “A” Taxpayers in Bahir Dar City Administration Revenue Office. Thesis, Department of Accounting & Finance, College of Business & Economics, Bahir Dar Unversity.
Ayza, B. (2017). Hukum Pajak Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. n.d. Retrieved 6 June 2020, from https://www.pajak.go.id/id/tax-treaty
ERCA. (2010). Tax & PCA Audit Policy & Strategy. Tax Audit Directorate.
Evelyn. (2014). Upaya Hukum Wajib Pajak Badan terhadap Hasil Pemeriksaan Pajak. Premise Law Journal.
Kemenkeu.go.id. (2020). APBN 2020. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/apbn2020
Kirchler, E. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lim, S. A., & Indrawati, L. (2019). Tinjauan Teoritis Efektivitas Pemeriksaan di Indonesia. BIP’s: Jurnal Bisnis Perspektif.
Mardiasmo. (2011). Perpajakan Edisi Revisi 2011 (16th ed.). Andi.
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mertokusumo, S. (2003). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar Edisi Ke-lima. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
OECD. (2006). Strengthening Tax Audit Capabilities: General Principles and Approaches. Centre For Tax Policy and Administration, Paris: OECD Publising.
Prasongko, Dias. (2010). Tempo.co. Desember 12. Retrieved 8 January 2020, from https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/291502/ditjen-pajak-sering-keok-di-pengadilan-pajak/full&view=ok
Ramdan, D. M. (2019). Kontan.co.id. Maret 22. Retrieved 8 January 2020, from https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/tax-ratio-indonesia-rendah-ini-yang-harus-dilakukan-otoritas-pajak
Resmi, S. (2008). Perpajakan, Teori dan Kasus, Buku 1 Edisi 4. Salemba Empat.
S., M. F. (2018). Hukum Pajak di Indonesia: Suatu Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Terapan di Bidang Perpajakan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sen, D. K., & Bala, S. K. (2002). Tax audit: Bangladesh panorama. Managerial Auditing Journal, 17(8).
Setiyaji, G., & Amir, H. (2005). Evauasi Kinerja Sistem Perpajakan Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi.
Soemitro, R. (1977). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pajak dan Pajak Pendapatan 1944. Bandung: Eresco.
Suwiknyo, E. (2019). Kekalahan Ditjen Pajak di Pengadilan Bukti Lemahnya Mitigasi Sengketa. Retrieved 8 January 2020, from https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20190814/259/1136320/kekalahan-ditjen-pajak-di-pengadilan-bukti-lemahnya-mitigasi-sengketa
Taroreh, J. A. (2013). Pemeriksaan dan Penyidikan terhadap Pelanggaran Pajak. Lex Crimen.
Wahyudi, T., Ludigdo, U., & Djamhuri, A. (2017). Sengketa Pajak dalam Perspektif Pemeriksa Pajak (Sebuah Studi Fenomenologi). Jurnal Riset Dan Aplikasi: Akuntansi Dan Manajemen.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi (JATI) to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Articles published in Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi (JATI) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- By publishing in Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi (JATI), authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.