Pengaruh financial distress, opinion shopping, prior opinion, dan audit tenure terhadap opini audit going concern
DOI:
Abstract Views:
24 times
PDF Downloads:
13 times
Abstract
Purpose – This research aims to investigate the effect of financial distress, opinion shopping, prior opinion, and audit tenure on a going-concern audit opinion. The data used in this research is secondary data sourced from audited published financial reports and annual reports of property and real estate companies between 2017 and 2022.
Methods – The population includes property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange, from which 132 samples are selected through a non-probability sampling technique with a purposive sampling. This research uses logistic linear regression analysis as a data analysis technique.
Findings – The findings of this research indicate that all the independent factors, including financial distress, have been shown to have a beneficial impact on the acceptance of a going-concern audit opinion. Empirical evidence has shown that engaging in opinion shopping has a beneficial impact of acceptance of a going-concern audit opinion. Prior opinion has been shown to have a beneficial impact on the acceptance of a going-concern audit opinion. Research has shown that the length of audit tenure positively influences the likelihood of receiving a going-concern audit opinion.
Implications - Contribution to literature regarding the factors that need to be considered in evaluating sustainability, particularly for property and real estate businesses.
Originality - Focuses on property and real estate businesses, which have not previously been the focus of research in identifying factors that influence the acceptance of going concern audit opinions.
Downloads
References
Amiruddin, Pontoh, G. T., & Lauren, M. (2021). The Effect of Financial Distress, Firm Growth, and Previous Year’s Opinion on The Firm’s Going Concern Opinion. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(1), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.17762/pae.v58i1.766
Audry, B. C., & Setyawati, D. M. (2023). Effect of Financial Distress on Going Concern Audit Opinion. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology, 2(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v2i1.2340
Ernst & Young Indonesia. (2019). Laporan atas Investigasi Berbasis Fakta PT. Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk. In Laporan atas Investigasi Berbasis Fakta PT. Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk. https://accounting.binus.ac.id/2021/12/27/kasus-fraud-pt-tiga-pilar-sejahtera-masalah-fraud/
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro: Semarang
Gulo, W., & Setyawati, D. M. (2021). The Effect of Financial Distress, Company Size, and Previous Year’s Audit Opinion on Going Concern Audit Opinion. Archives of Business Research, 9(9), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.99.10797
Hardi, H., Wiguna, M., Hariyani, E., & Putra, A. A. (2020). Opinion Shopping, Prior Opinion, Audit Quality, Financial Condition, and Going Concern Opinion. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.169
Hastuty HS., W., & Azzahra, A. S. (2020). Analisis Faktor Reputasi Auditor, Disclosure, Dan Audit Client Tenure terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Mutiara Akuntansi 67, 5(1), 1–11.
Immanuel, B., & Aprilyanti, R. (2019). Analysis of Audit Tenure, Opinion Shopping, Company Growth, and Debt to Equity Ratio Effect on Audit Going Concern Opinion. ECo-Fin, 1(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.32877/ef.v1i2.125
Jatmiko, B., Ladiva, S., Machmuddah, Z., & Laras, T. (2020). Factors Affecting Audit Going Concern Opinion and the Role of Supply Chain Strategy: Evidence from Banking Company in Indonesia. Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt, 9(5), 1092. http://excelingtech.co.uk/
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kuswara, C. S., & Yanto, E. (2019). The Influence of Previous Audit Opinion, Audit Tenure and Liquidity toward Going Concern Opinion. JAAF (Journal of Applied Accounting and Finance), 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33021/jaaf.v3i1.674
Liliani, P. (2021). Pengaruh Financial Distress, Debt Default, dan Audit Tenure terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, 8(2), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.52859/jba.v8i2.175
Meiryani, Warganegara, D. L., Fernando, E., Riantono, I. E., & Tumiwa, A. H. (2021). The Effect of Financial Distress and Auditor’s Reputation on Going Concern Audit Opinion Study on Manufacturing Companies. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457640.3457661
Mulyawati, A., & Munandar, A. (2022). Audits Quality in Mediating Profitability, Liquidity, Audit Lag, Prior Opinion on Accepting Going Concern Audits. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(8), 1000–1012. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v1i8.178
Munzir, Nurfatimah, U. F., & Nisak, K. M. (2021). Pengaruh Opinion Shopping, Dan Debt Default terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Fair Unimuda, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21608/pshj.2022.250026
Muslimah, O., & Triyanto, D. N. (2019). Pengaruh Pertumbuhan Perusahaan, Prior Opinion, Debt Default dan Opinion Shopping terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. JASa (Jurnal Akuntansi, Audit Dan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12500-010-0009-5
Novriansa, A., & Rahmawati, M. (2019). The Effect of Going-Concern Audit Opinion on Market Reaction: Evidence from Indonesia. Opcion, 35(Special Issue 20), 263–279.
Nurbaiti, A., & Permatasari, N. P. A. I. (2019). The Effect of Audit Tenure, Disclosure, Financial Distress, and Previous Year’s Audit Opinion on Acceptance of Going Concern Audit Opinion. HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, 10(3), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2019-0028
Nurbaiti, A., Dinata, R. O., & Mawaddah, Z. A. (2021). Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern Financial Distress, Debt Default, dan Return On Assets. Conference on Economic and Business Innovation, 35, 1–14.
Olimsar, F. (2022). Going Concern Audit Opinion Reviewed from The Company’s Financial Condition, Audit Tenure, and Audit Opinion in The Previous Year. Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijssr.03.02.04
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penggunaan Jasa Akuntan Publik dan Kantor Akuntan Publik dalam Kegiatan Jasa Keuangan.
Prasetyo, M. H., Dewi, V. S., & Maharani, B. (2021). Influence of Audit Tenure, Audit Lag, Opinion Shopping, Liquidity, Leverage, and Profitability on Audit Going Concern Opinion. Borobudur Accounting Review, 1(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.31603/bacr.4870
Prayoga, M. H., & Aryati, T. (2023). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Financial Distress Dan Audit Tenure terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(1), 1289–1298. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v3i1.16081
Puspaningsih, A., & Analia, A. P. (2020). The Effect of Debt Default, Opinion Shopping, Audit Tenure and Company’s Financial Conditions on Going-concern Audit Opinions. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 9(2), 115–127. https://www.proquest.com/openview/6f60b94fadcb152d3d8a6fadc7855dd5/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2032316
Putra, W. M., & Purnamawati, R. (2020). The Effect of Audit Tenure, Audit Delay, Company Growth, Profitability, Leverage, and Financial Difficulties on Acceptance of Going Concern Audit Opinions. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020-Accounting and Management (ICoSIAMS 2020), 176(ICoSIAMS 2020), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210121.027
Putri, N. L., Inayati, N. I., Haryanto, E., & Setyadi, E. J. (2022). Influence of Audit Opinions, Auditor Reputation, Company Growth, and Profitability on Going Concern Audit Opinions. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30659/jai.11.1.1-20
Qintharah, Y. N., & Utami, F. L. (2021). The Effect of Company Size and Financial Distress on Going Concern Audit Opinions with Opinion Shopping as Moderation Variables. Journal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 7(1), 81–100.
Ramadhan, A. P., & Sumardjo, M. (2021). Previous Years Audit Opinions, Profitability, Audit Tenure, and Quality Control System on Going Concern Audit Opinion. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.2.817
Ramadhani, F. T., & Sulistyowati, W. A. (2020). Detection of Going Concern Audit Opinion Based on Disclosure, Financial Condition and Opinion Shopping. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Universitas Pamulang, 8(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.32493/jiaup.v8i1.3563
Simamora, R. A., & Hendarjatno, H. (2019). The Effects of Audit Client Tenure, Audit lag, Opinion Shopping, Liquidity Ratio, and Leverage to The Going Concern Audit Opinion. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 4(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-05-2019-0038
Suryani, I., Yuniarti, R., & Syahrudin, M. (2023). Effect of Financial Distress, Liquidity, and Leverage on The Audit Opinion Going Concern. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46336/ijbesd.v4i1.379
Syofyan, E., & Vianti, K. O. (2021). Going Concern Audit Opinion: the Role of Audit Delay, Opinion Shopping, Financial Distress, Leverage and Size of Company. Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.11.3.235-246
Taqi, M. (2013). Audit Quality: Analysis Auditor and Auditee’s Factor in Signaling Theory Perspective. 00, 1–6. www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia
Theresia, L., & Setiawan, T. (2023). Audit Tenure, Audit Lag, Opinion Shopping, Liquidity and Leverage, The Going Concern Audit Opinion. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(03), 1064–1072. http://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi
Taufan, & Wenny, C. D. (2022). Pengaruh Ukuran KAP, Financial Distress, dan Opini Tahun Sebelumnya terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Multi Data Palembang, 11(2), 295–310.
Wahyudi, I., Lestari, H. E., & Mahroji. (2022). Pengaruh Financial Distress, Opinion Shopping, dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. JIMF (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Forkamma), 5(2), 200. https://doi.org/10.32493/frkm.v5i2.18392
Widhiastuti, N. L. P., & Kumalasari, P. D. (2022). Opini Audit Going Concern dan Faktor-Faktor Penyebabnya. Akurasi: Jurnal Studi Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.29303/akurasi.v5i1.152
Widiatami, A. K., Tanzil, N. D., Irawadi, C., & Nurkhin, A. (2020). Audit Committee’s Role in Moderating the Effect of Financial Distress. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(4), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n4p432
Yanti, N. P. P. E., & Dwirandra, A. A. N. B. (2019). Opinion Shopping Sebagai Pemoderasi Pengaruh Financial Distress pada Opini Audit Going Concern. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 26(1), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2019.v26.i91.p05
Yuliani, A. F., & Abubakar, A. (2023). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, Audit Tenure, dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(1), 1705–1714. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v3i1.16240
Yunus, M., Calen, & Sirait, S. (2020). Pengaruh Prediksi Kebangkrutan Model Altman Z-Score, Reputasi Auditor dan Opinion Shopping terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Riset & Jurnal Akuntansi, 4(1), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v4i1.174
De Angelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting & Economic 3 (December): 183-199.
Arkandana M. T., Mariel W. C. F., & Pramana S. (2022). The impact during of pandemic COVID19 on property sector case study: DKI jakarta province. Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia, 11(3), 265–79.
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and The Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843.x
Spence, Michael. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi (JATI) to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- Articles published in Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi (JATI) are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- By publishing in Akuntansi dan Teknologi Informasi (JATI), authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
