KEKUATAN MENGIKAT ORDER DARI MAHKAMAH INTERNATIONAL: ANALISA YURIDIS KASUS LAGRAND ANTARA JERMAN V AMERIKA SERIKAT
Abstract Views:
1004 times
PDF - FULL TEXT Downloads:
1342 times
Abstract
Abstrak - Skripsi ini membahas tentang kekuatan mengikat order dari Mahkamah Internasional bagi negara yang bersengketa. Order dari Mahkamah Internasional ini kerap kali tidak dipatuhi oleh negara karena dianggap tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat yang jelas akibat tidak adanya sanksi yang keras. Hingga, pada kasus LaGrand, dimana Mahkamah Internasional mengeluarkan order untuk menghentikan eksekusi pidana mati bagi Karl LaGrand, seorang warga negara Jerman, tetapi oleh Amerika Serikat dilanggar dan tetap menjalankan eksekusi tersebut, dinyatakan pada putusan akhirnya bahwa order memiliki kekuatan mengikat. Skripsi ini menggunakan metode penulisan yuridis-normatif, dengan bahan hukum yang ada masalah dikaji melalui statute approach dan conceptual approach untuk mencapai hasil. Hasil dari pengkajian skripsi ini menunjukan bahwa order dari Mahkamah Internasional memiliki kekuatan mengikat karena order merupakan putusan Mahkamah Internasional yang harus dilaksanakan dan dipatuhi oleh negara yang bersengketa.
Kata Kunci: Kekuatan Mengikat, Order, Mahkamah Internasional
Abstract -This thesis discusses about the binding force of order from International Court of Justice for the disputing parties. Orders from the International Court of Justice are often violated by the concerning parties because they do not have serious penalties. Until the LaGrand case, where the International Court of Justice issued an order to stop the execution of death penalty for Karl LaGrand, a German citizen, but this order was violated by the United States government and the execution took place, it was declared in the final decision that orders have binding force. This thesis uses juridical-normative method, the law substances processed through statute approach and conceptual approach in order to found the result. The result from this thesis shows that orders from international court of justice have a binding force on LaGrand case, because order is one of International Court of Justice‟s products which have to be obeyed by the disputing parties.
Keywords: Order, Binding Force, International Court of Justice
Downloads
References
Bos, M. (1984). A Methodelogy of International Law. Amsterdam.
Brownlie. (2008). Principles of Public International Law Seventh Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brownlie. (1979). Principles of Public International Law Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cassese. (2005). International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dewanto, W. A. (2005). Mahkamah Internasional. Sidoarjo: Citramedia.
Frowein, J. A. (2002). Provisional Measures by the International Court of Justice. The LaGrand Case , 56.
Glahn, G. v. (1970). Law Among Nation : An Introduction to Public International Law. New York: Mc. Millan Publishing co. Inc.
Gross. (1976). The Future of International Court of Justice.
Gustina, A. (2014, Juni). The Important of Mandatory Consular Notification Between Indonenesia and Other Foreign States. Mimbar Hukum Volume 26 Nomor 2 , p. 323.
Hellbeck, E. (1985). Provisional Measure of The International Court of Justice: Are They Binding? Association of Student International Law Societies International Law Journal 9 , 169-187.
Holdsworth. (1916). The Relation of the Equity Administered by the Chancellor. New Haven: Yale L.J.
Hudson, M. O. (1920-1942, 1943). The Permanent Court of International Justice. 425.
Humbro, E. (1956). The Binding Character of the Provisional Measures of Protection Indicated by the International Court of Justice. Geburstag: Rechtsfagen derZnternationalen Organisation.
Kempen, B., & He, Z. (2009). The Recent Development. The Practice of The International Court of Justice on Provisional Measures , 925.
Kerly, D. M. (1890). An Historical Sketch of The Equitable Jurisdiction of The Court of Chancery. Cambridge: University Press.
Kolb, R. (2013). The International Court of Justice. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Kusumaatmadja, M. &. (2010). Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Liebelt, F. (2010). Third State Intervention before the International Court of Justice in International Environmental Law Cases , 3.
Manfred, L. (1976). Teachings and Teaching of International Law. 151 Recuile Des Cours , 212.
Mendelson. (1998). The Formation of Customary International Law. Den Haag: Hague Academy of International Law Press.
Merrils, J. (1984). International Dispute Settlement. Cambdridge: Cambridge University Press.
N. Hassan Wirayuda. (n.d.). Refleksi 2003 dan Proyeksi 2004 Departemen Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from KBRI: http://www.kbri-canberra.org.au/speeches/2004/040106menlu.htm
Oellers-Frahm, K. (2006). The Statute of The International Court of Justice : A Commentary. First Edition OUP , 962.
Posner, E. A. (2005). Is the International Court of Justice Biased? The Journal of Legal Studies 34, no. 2 , 603.
Rao, P. S. (n.d.). International Law Comission. Retrieved March 10, 2018, from OPIL: Pemmaraju Srhttp://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law9780199231690-e1425?rskey=bDpylL&result=1&prd=OPIL
Rosenne, S. (1965). The Law and Practice of The International Court. Leiden.
Rosenne, S. (2005). Provisional Measures in International Law. The International Court of Justice and The International Tribunal for The Law of Sea , 33.
S.A., A. (2006). The Compulsory Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sims, J. C., & Carter, L. E. (n.d.). Representing Foreign Nationals: Emerging Importance of The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations as a Defence Tool. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from http://www.nacdl.org/CHAMPION/ARTICLES/98sep01.htm
Sloane, R. D. (2007). Measures Necessary to Ensure: The ICJ's Provisional Measures Order in Avena and Other Mexican Nationals. Boston: Boston University of Law.
Stark, J. (1992). Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Thirlway. (2001). The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960-1989(Past Twelve). The British Yearbook of The International Law , 99.
Weinman, J. L. (2002). The Clash Between U.S. Criminal Procedure and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: An Analysis of the International Court of Justice Decision in the LaGrand Case. American University International Law Review Volume 17 Issues 4 , p. 866.
Widodo. (2009). Hukum Diplomatik dan Konsuler Pada Era Globalisasi. Surabaya: Laksbang Justisia.
- Articles published in CALYPTRA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to CALYPTRA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in CALYPTRA, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
