KECURANGAN AKADEMIK DITINJAU DARI RELIGIUSITAS DAN JENIS KELAMIN PADA SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS YANG BERBASIS AGAMA

  • Tutik Fardiana Fitri Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Surabaya
  • Andrian Pramadi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Surabaya
Abstract Views: 250 times
PDF - FULL TEXT Downloads: 512 times
Keywords: academic cheating, religiosity, gender

Abstract

academic cheating is an act that violates the rules by using a variety of ways. The way is not allowed in academic tasks because it would interfere with the process of assesment. Academic cheating is a complex thing. A wide variety of factors can affect academic fraud. One of the factors that influence academic cheating is religiosity. The study aims to determine the correlation betwen religiosity and academik cheating in terms of gender in class X and XI of the SMA AL-ISLAM KRIAN period 2016-2017. The research is quantitative with accidental sampling technique of convenience sampling. 426 subjects the students of class X dan XI. There are 142 male and 284 female. Data analiyzed using Spearman correlation with SPSS ( Statisticalprogram for yhe social sciences) version 13.0. Results from this study that there is a negative correlation between academic cheating and religiosity r= -0.097 (p=0.046), and there are differences in academic cheating when viewed from the gender sig 0.000, so many factors in addition to religiosity affect academic cheating.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderman E. M. & Murdock T. B. (2007). Psychology of Academic Cheating. London : Academic Press

Anderman E. M. & H Lynley. (2009). Psychology of classroom learning : an encyclopedia. Cengage Learning.

Clariana, M., Badia, M., & Cladellas, R.. (2013). Academic Cheating and Gender Differences in Barcelona (Spain). Summa Psicologica UST, Vol,10, pp. 65-72.

Dister, N. S. (1988). Pengalaman dan Motivasi Beragama, Jakarta : Kanisius

Huber, S. & Huber, W. O. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale. Faculty of Theology, Interreligious Studies, University of Berne, Unitobler, Länggassstrasse 51, CH-3012 Bern, pp 710-724

Hurlock, E. B. (1980). Psikologi Perkembangan: Suatu Pendekatan Sepanjang Rentang Kehidupan, ed. Kelima (Istiwidayanti & Soedjarwo, pengalih bhs). Dalam R. M. Sijabat (Ed). Jakarta: Erlangga

Kobayasi, E., & Fukushima, M. (2012). Gender, Social Bond, and Academic Cheating in Japan. Sociology & Criminilogy Faculty Publications. Paper 104.

Martin, A., & Sagarin, B. (2013). Does Religion Buffer Cheating?. Department of Psychology Northern Illinois University.

McCabe, D. L, & Trevino, L.K. & Butterfield, K.D. (2010). Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of reserch. Journal of Ethics & Behavior, vol, 11.3 pp. 219-232.

Sugiono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan, Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung:Penerbit Alfabeta

Suryabrata, S. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada
Published
2018-03-01
Issue
Vol. 7 No. 2 (2019): Calyptra : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya (Maret)
Section
Bidang Psikologi (ED)

Creative Commons License

  • Articles published in CALYPTRA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
  • Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to CALYPTRA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
  • By publishing in CALYPTRA, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.