ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN KASUS PEMBANTAIAN RAS NUER DI SUDAN SELATAN DITINJAU DARI STATUTA ROMA 1998
Abstract Views:
1 times
PDF Downloads:
1 times
Abstract
Abstract —The international legal provisions for the crime of genocide are regulated in Article 5 of the 1998 Rome Statute. The massacre case that occurred in South Sudan can be categorized as a crime of genocide primarily because it specifically attacked a particular group, namely the Nuer Race. South Sudan is not a state party to the 1998 Rome Statute. Judicial developments regarding the case until 2019 have not been resolved even though action has been taken by the African Union, so it is indicated that there is a condition of 'Unwilling' by South Sudan regarding the resolution of the case. The aim of this research is to provide a juridical analysis of whether the ICC as a complementary judicial institution with national jurisdiction can play a role in resolving cases even though South Sudan is not a party state. The research results refer to Article 12 paragraph 3 of the 1998 Rome Statute that the ICC has the authority to play a role in resolving cases as regulated in Article 13 letter b of the 1998 Rome Statute through the 'proprio motu' authority to the ICC Prosecutor to carry out investigations.
Keywords: rome statute 1998, icc, crime of genocide, massacre of the nuer race south sudan, proprio motu
Abstrak—Ketentuan hukum secara internasional dari kejahatan genosida diatur dalam Pasal 5 Statuta Roma 1998. Kasus pembantaian yang terjadi di Sudan Selatan dapat dikategorikan sebagai suatu kejahatan genosida utamanya karena secara khusus menyerang terhadap suatu kelompok tertentu yaitu pembantaian Ras Nuer. Sudan Selatan bukan merupakan negara pihak dalam Statuta Roma 1998. Perkembangan peradilan terhadap kasus hingga 2019 tidak terselesaikan meski telah ditindak oleh African Union, sehingga diindikasikan terdapat kondisi ‘Unwilling’ oleh Sudan Selatan terhadap penyelesaian kasus. Tujuan dari penelitian ini ingin memberikan analisis yuridis apakah ICC selaku lembaga peradilan pelengkap yurisdiksi nasional dapat turut berperan dalam penyelesaian kasus meski Sudan Selatan bukan merupakan negara pihak. Hasil penelitian mengacu pada Pasal 12 paragraf 3 Statuta Roma 1998 bahwa ICC memiliki kewenangan untuk ikut berperan dalam penyelesaian kasus sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Pasal 13 huruf b Statuta Roma 1998 melalui adanya kewenangan ‘proprio motu’ kepada Jaksa ICC untuk melakukan investigasi.
Kata kunci: statuta roma 1998, icc, kejahatan genosida, pembantaian ras nuer sudan selatan, proprio motu
Downloads
References
AU Commission of Inquiry on South Sudan. (2014). FINAL REPORT OF THE AFRICAN UNION COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ON SOUTH SUDAN. Addis Ababa: African Union.
Haryomataram. (1984). Hukum Humaniter. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Pictet, J. (1962). The Geneva Convention and the Law of War: Revue International de la Croix Rouge.
Afriye, F. A., Jian, J., & Appiah, K. Y. (2020). COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF SOUTH SUDAN CONFLICT: DETERMINANTS AND REPERCUSSIONS. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 6(1), 33-45.
Sikainga, A. A., Spaulding, J. L., Collins, R. O., & el Din Sabr, M. (n.d.). South Sudan. Retrieved from Laman Resmi Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/place/South-Sudan
Ambarwati, Ramdhany, D., & Rusman, R. (2017). HUKUM HUMANITER INTERNASIONAL DALAM STUDI HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL. Depok: Rajawali Pers .
Fourth Geneva Convention. (1949). Retrieved from United Nations Official Website: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.33_GC-IV- EN.pdf
United Nations Security Councils. (2014). Retrieved from United Nations Digital Library Website: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/771722?ln=en#record-files-collapse- header
Muhumuza, R. (2017). British official: South Sudan violence is tribal ‘genocide’. Retrieved from Laman Resmi AP News: https://apnews.com/article/f41d9a3e9dd147f6bddd0d8f4822d342
Genocide Convention. (1948). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Retrieved from UN Official Website: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity- crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of% 20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf
UNMISS. (2014). Conflict in South Sudan: A Human Rights Report. United Nations.
Russel-Brown. (2003). Rape as an Act of Genocide. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 1- 25.
J.G.Starke. (1989). Introduction to International Law. London: Butterworths Ltd.
Sulistia, T. (2021). Pengaturan Perang dan Konflik Bersenjata dalam Hukum humaniter Internasional. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 4(3), 530.
Schindler. (1979). The Difference Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols. Recueil de Cours-Collected Course of The Hague Academy of International Law.
(2008). Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Oxford University Press.
Darmawan, A. (2005). Prinsip Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Komandan Dalam Hukum Humaniter . Jakarta : Pusat Studi Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Fakultas Hukum Trisakti .
Rizanizarli. (2001). Hukum Humaniter Internasional dan Hubungannya Dengan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kanun, 11(29).
ICRC. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/germany-aerial-drone- attack-mir-alipakistan
Simarmata, M. H. (2018). Pentingnya Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Humaniter Dalam Undang- Undang Tindak Pidana Terorisme. Jurnal legislasi Indonesia, 15(2), 124-125.
Piero, V. (1992). Dictionary of International Law of Armed Conflict. Geneva: International Committee of Red Cross.
ICRC. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.icrc.org/en/document/what-are-jus-ad-bellum- and-jus-bello-0%EF%BB%BF
Cherif Bassiouni, J. P. (1989). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting . Proceedings of the Annual Meeting Vol.83 .
Office of the high commissioner for the human rights. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.preventgenocide.org/ab/1998/
International criminal court. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.icc-cpi.int/darfur/albashir
Widyawati, A. (2014). Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Aulia, F. (2021). Implementasi Penetapan Suatu Negara Unwilling atau Unable Oleh International Criminal Court (ICC). Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Vol. 9 .
Court record. (n.d.). Retrieved from International Criminal Court: https://www.icc- cpi.int/court-record/icc-01/11-01/11-293-red
Court record. (n.d.). Retrieved from Internationa criminal court: https://www.icc- cpi.int/court-record/icc-01/04-01/07-1459
(n.d.). Retrieved from ICRC: https://casebook.icrc.org/a_to_z/glossary/non-international- armed-conflict
(n.d.). Retrieved from ICRC: https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/yemen-un-report-armed- conflicts-2014
- Articles published in CALYPTRA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to CALYPTRA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in CALYPTRA, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
