GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN TRANSFORMASIONAL, INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR PEKERJA MUDAH SEKTOR RETAIL YANG DIMEDIASI KNOWLEDGE SHARING
Abstract Views:
7 times
PDF Downloads:
6 times
Abstract
Abstract—The Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) exhibited by fresh graduate employees is crucial for companies as a strategy for success in today's competitive business environment. IWB can be influenced by transformational leadership and knowledge sharing. This research aims to examine the relationship between transformational leadership and Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) among fresh graduate employees in the retail industry. This study also tests the mediating role of knowledge sharing in this relationship. The research employs a quantitative method with accidental sampling involving 104 respondents of fresh graduate workers. The study utilizes the Innovative Work Behavior Scale (IWBS), Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 5x (MLQ 5x), and Knowledge Management Scan (KMS) as measurement tools. Data is collected through questionnaires and analyzed using regression analysis. The findings of the study reveal a positive relationship between transformational leadership and Innovative Work Behavior (IWB). The study also confirms that knowledge sharing plays a significant mediating role (p < 0.05) in this relationship. The implications of these findings are valuable for the retail industry in formulating strategies to enhance the innovative work behavior of new graduate employees. The role of knowledge sharing as a mediator in this study is partial in connecting transformational leadership and Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) (z= 5.731; p=0.001). Hypothesis testing supports previous research findings, confirming that transformational leadership supports the practice of knowledge sharing (KS) and Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) in the workplace. Thus, this study has both theoretical and practical benefits for universities, employees, and company leaders in the retail sector.
Keywords: transformational leadership, innovative work behavior (iwb), fresh graduate, retail & fmcg, knowledge sharing
Abstrak—Penelitian Innovative Work Behavior (IWB) yang dimiliki oleh pekerja fresh graduates dibutuhkan oleh perusahaan sebagai strategi keberhasilan persaingan kompetitif pada era saat ini. Innovative Work Behavior sendiri dapat dipengaruhi oleh gaya kepemimpinan transformasional dan knowledge sharing. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara kepemimpinan transformasional dan innovative work behavior (IWB) pada karyawan fresh graduates di industri retail. Studi ini juga menguji peran mediasi knowledge sharing dalam hubungan tersebut. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode kuantitatif dengan accidental sampling yang melibatkan 104 responden pekerja fresh graduates. Penelitian dilakukan dengan alat ukur Innovative Work Behavior Scale (IWBS), Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 5x (MLQ 5x), dan Knowledge Management Scan (KMS). Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan dianalisis dengan analisis regresi . Temuan penelitian menunjukkan hubungan positif antara kepemimpinan transformasional dan innovative work behavior (IWB). Studi ini juga mengkonfirmasi bahwa knowledge sharing berperan sebagai mediator yang signifikan (p <0,05) dalam hubungan tersebut. Implikasi temuan ini berguna bagi industri retail untuk merumuskan strategi meningkatkan perilaku kerja inovatif karyawan baru lulus. Peran knowledge sharing sebagai mediator pada penelitian ini bersifat parsial dalam menghubungkan gaya kepemimpinan transformasional dan innovative work behavior (IWB) (z= 5,731 ; p=0,001). Uji hipotesis mendukung temuan penelitian sebelumnya, mengonfirmasi bahwa kepemimpinan transformasional mendukung praktik knowledge sharing (KS) dan innovative work behavior (IWB) di tempat kerja, sehingga memiliki manfaat teoritis dan praktis bagi universitas, pekerja, atasan perusahaan sektor retail.
Kata kunci: transformational leadership, innovative work behavior(iwb), fresh graduate, retail & fmcg, knowledge sharing
Downloads
References
Abbas, W., Amin, H., Mahrukh, A., & Khalil, H. (2022). Probing the Nexus Between Innovative Work Behavior and Religious Belief: One Belt and One Road Perspective. Kashmir Economic Review
Achmad Sani Supriyanti dan Vivin Maharani. 2013. Metodologi Penelitian Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.
Afsar, B., Badir, Y., & Saeed, B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior.
Industrial Management and Data Systems, 114(8), 1270–1300. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2014-0152
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.
Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235258.
Aydın, Ekrem & Erkılıç, Eren. (2020). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: The mediating role of knowledge sharing. 2. 106-117.
Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan Validitas (4th Ed.). Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industrial, military, and educational impact.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision. Organızational Dynamics, 18, 19-31.
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–218. doi:10.1037/0021- 9010.88.2.207
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2005). Transformational leadership: Second edition. Transformational Leadership: Second Edition, 1–282. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617095
Binder, D. A. (1982), “Non-Parametric Bayesian Models for Samples From Finite Populations,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 44, 388–393.
Brealiastiti, R. (2021). Penerapan Standar Gri Sebagai Panduan Penyusunan Laporan Keberlanjutan Tahun 2020 Perusahaan Sektor Barang Konsumen Primer Dan Non-Primer Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Ekobisman, 6(1), 138–156.
Chang, J. C., Lee, C. Y., Wei, P. Y., & Huang, W. C. (2018). How do employees inspire innovative work behavior? transformational leadership and work motivation perspectives. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2017-Decem:1797– 1801. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2017.8290201.
Choi, S. B., Kim, K., Ullah, S. M. E., & Kang, S. W. (2016). How Transformational Leadership Facilitates Innovative Behavior of Korean Workers Examining Mediating and Moderating Processes.
Personnel Review, 45(3), 459–479. doi:10.1108/PR03-2014-0058
Coaley, K. ( 2010). An Introduction to Psychological Assessment and Psychmetrics. London: Sage.
De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2007). How leaders influence employees' innovative behavior. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(1), 41-64.
De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23-36.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Garvin, David A. "How Google Sold Its Engineers on Management." R1312D. Harvard Business Review 91, no. 12 (December 2013): 74–82.
Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of Individual Level Innovation at Work: A Meta -Analysis. Jpurnal of Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Vol. 5 No. 1. doi:DOI: 10.1037/a0018556
Hayes, A. F. (2019). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (D. A. Kenny & T. D. Little (eds.)). The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/lied18789-006
Humphreys, J. H. (2002). Transformational leader behavior, proximity and successful services marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 487– 502. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210443373.
Ilhamzen. 2013. Statistika Parametrik Part 5 Uji ANOVA Satu Arah (One-Way ANOVA) Menggunakan Program SPSS, Free Learning, (Online), http://freelearningji.wordpress.com, diakses 24 Maret 2014.
James MacGregor Burns. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row Publishers.
Joris, V. der V. (2016). Change leadership and public sector organizational change: Examining the interactions of transformational leadership style and red tape. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 660–682.
Kania, D., Senen, S. H., & Masharyono, M. (2018). Analisis Gambaran Kepemimpinan Transformasional, Work Engagement Dan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif Karyawan. Journal of Business Management Education (JBME), 3(3), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.17509/jbme.v3i3.14311.
Katz, M. H. (2006). Multivariable analysis: a practical guide for clinicians 2nd Editions. Cambridge university press.
Khan, A. M., Jantan, A. H. Bin, Salleh, L. B. M., Dato’Mansor, Z., Islam, M. A., & Hosen, S. (2019). The impact of transformational leadership effects on innovative work behavior by the moderating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8(December), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.79.
Kurniawan, A. W., & Puspitaningtyas, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Pandiva Buku
Kurniawan, D. T., Chaqiqi, M. M., Maria, L. E., Sanusi, A., & Alam, R. S. (2021). Pengaruh Organizational Justice Dan Entrepreneurial Leadership Terhadap Innovative Work Behavior Pada Pegawai Pemerintah. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen, Dan Informatika (JBMI), 18(II), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.26487/jbmi.v18i2.18147.
Li, H., Sajjad, N., Wang, Q., Ali, A. M., Khaqan, Z., & Amina, S. (2019). Influence of transformational leadership on employees’ innovative work behavior in sustainable organizations: Test of mediation and moderation processes. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061594
Ma’sum, T. (2019). Persinggungan Kepemimpinan Transformational Dengan Kepemimpinan Visioner Dan Situasional. Manajeman Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 1–23.
Muenjohn, N., & Armstrong, A. (2008). Evaluating the Structural Validity of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Contemporary Management Research, 4(1), 3–14
Muhidin, S. A. & Abdurahman, M. (2017). Analisis Korelasi, Regresi, dan Jalur dalam Penelitian : Dilengkapi Aplikasi Program SPSS. Bandung : Pustaka Setia.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson.
Imran, R., & Haque, M. A. (2011). Mediating effect of organizational climate between transformasional leadership and innovative work behaviour. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 26(2), 183-189.
Octavia, A., & Ratnaningsih, I. Z. (2017). Dengan Perilaku Inovatif Karyawan Non Proses ( Supporting) PT Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa Tbk Plant Palimana n. Jurnal Empati, 6(1), 40–44.
Ong, J. O., Sutawijaya, A. H., & Saluy, A. B. (2020). Strategi Inovasi Model Bisnis Ritel Modern Di Era Industri 4.0. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis, 6(02), 201–210. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com
Phung, V. D., Hawryszkiewycz, I., & Chandran, D. (2019). How knowledge sharing leads to innovative work behaviour: A moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Systems and
Information Technology, 21(3), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-11-2018-0148
Sambung, R. (2020). Pelatihan dan Kepemimpinan Visioner dalam meningkatkan Kreativitas Pegawai di Kalimantan Tengah. Matrik : Jurnal Manajemen, Strategi Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 169. https://doi.org/10.24843/matrik:jmbk.2020.v14.i02.p04.
Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Seltzer, J., and Bass, B.M. 1990. Transformational Leadership: Beyond Initiation and Consideration. Journal of Management, 16 (4): 693-703.
Setiasih & Setianingrum, I. (2018). Statistik Psikologi : Solusi Masalah Psikologi dengan Statistik. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Setyowati, S., & Etikariena, A. (2019). Peran Gaya Pemecahan Masalah dalam Hubungan Kepemimpinan Transformasional dengan Perilaku Kerja Inovatif. Jurnal Diversita, 5(2), 115– 125. https://doi.org/10.31289/diversita.v5i2.2857
Stanescu, D. F., Zbuchea, A., & Pinzaru, F. (2020). Transformational leadership and innovative work behaviour: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Kybernetes, December 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-07-2019-0491
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Penerbit ALFABETA.
Supardi, S. (1993). Populasi dan Sampel Penelitian. Unisia, 13(17), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.20885/unisia.vol13.iss17.art13
Supardi. (2013). Aplikasi Statistika dalam penelitian konsep statistika yang lebih komprehensif. Jakarta: Change Publication.
Supriyanto Achmad S & Maharani, Vivin. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (cet. Ke-2). Malang: UIN-MALIKI Press.
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market, and organizational change (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591-620.
Pawar, B.S., and Easman, K.K. 1997. The Nature and Implication of Contextual Influences on Transactional Leadership: A Conceptual Examination. Academy of Management Review, 22 (1): 80-109.
Putri, N. M. D., Ma’ruf, A., & Sutinah, S. (2020). Pengaruh Leader-Member Exchange dan Psychological Empowerment terhadap Innovative Work Behavior: Review Sistematik. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(1), 156. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v9i1.24741.
Rangkuti, A. A., dan Wahyuni, Lussy Dwiutami. (2017). Modul Analisis Data Penelitian Kuantitatif Berbasis Classical Test Theory Dan Item Response Theory (RASCH Model). Jakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Midkiff, M. F., Lindsey, C. R., & Meadows, E. A. (2018). The role of coping self-efficacy in emotion regulation and frequency of NSSI in young adult college students. Cogent Psychology, 5(1), 1–
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2018.1520437
Van Den Hooff, B., & Ridder, J. A. (2004). Knowledge sharing in context: The influence of organizational commitment, communication climate and CMC use on knowledge sharing.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(6), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410567675
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives. Social behavior, 5(4), 1-21.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Articles published in CALYPTRA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the journal, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
- Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to CALYPTRA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
- By publishing in CALYPTRA, authors grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
