• Nadia Adelina Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Bisnis dan Ekonomika Universitas Surabaya
  • Senny Harindahyani Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Bisnis dan Ekonomika Universitas Surabaya


The purpose of this research is to analyzes the variables that influence the occurence of financial statement fraud using fruad diamond, those are; Pressure can be seen from the financial stability, external pressure, and financial targets. Then, opportunities can be seen from the Big 4. Meanwhile, for rationalization can be seen from turn of auditor and audit opinion. And the last one is the  capability can be seen form turn of director. The sample of this research using 15 companies which are always listed on the LQ-45 index in Indonesia Stock Exchange Effect from 2011-2016. The test  equipment data using SPSS 20 includes descriptive statistical analysis, classic assumption test, the coefficient of determination test, simultaneous significant test, and hypothesis test. The results of  this study showed that the variable external pressure and turn of director proven significant positive effect and variable financial stability, financial target, big 4, turn of director and opinion auditor are not proven on the fraud on financial report. The result of this research hoped to be a reference for future research and other users of financial information in detecting fraudulent of financial report.


Download data is not yet available.


Albercht, W. S. 2003. Fraud Examination. South Western: Thomson.

Annisya, M., Lindrianasari, & Asmaranti, Y. 2016. Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 72-89.

Arens, A. A. 2006. Auditing and Assurance Services. United States of America: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasly, M. S. 2014. Auditing and AssuranceService: An Integrated Approach. England: Pearson. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). 2016. Report to Nation. Diakses dari pada tangal 14 Maret 2017.

Cressey, D. R. 1973. Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Pschology of Emblezzlement. New Jersey: Montclair Petterson Smith.

Hopwood, W. S., Leiner, J. J., & Young, G. R. 2008. Forensic Accounting. New York: McGraw-Hill. 2015. Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Jadi Kunci Hadapi MEA. Diakses dari transparansi-jadi-kunci-hadapi-mea/ pada tanggal 14 Maret 2017.

Lin, C., Chiu, A., Huang, S. Y., & Yen, D. C. 2015. Detecting the Financial Statement Fraud: The Analysis of The Differences Between Data Mining Techniques and Experts' Judgments. Elvevier.

Rittenberg, L. E., Schwieger, B. J., & Karla, J. M. 2008. Auditing: A Business Risk Approach. South Western: Thomson.

Scott, W. R. 2003. Financial Accounting Theory. United States of America: PearsonEducation.

Suyanto. 2009. Fraudulent Financial Statement Evidence from Statement on Auditing Standard No.99. Gajah Mada International Journal of Business, Vol 11, hal. 117-144.
How to Cite
ADELINA, Nadia; HARINDAHYANI, Senny. ANALISIS FRAUD DIAMOND DALAM MENDETEKSI POTENSI FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD PADA PERUSAHAAN LQ-45 PERIODE 2011-2016. CALYPTRA, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. Hal. 446 - 460, mar. 2018. ISSN 2302-8203. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 18 sep. 2019.