Upcycled Products in Indonesia: Factors Influencing Willingness to Pay

  • Christabel Annora Paramita Parung Desain Fashion dan Produk Lifestyle, Fakultas Industri Kreatif, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya - Indonesia
  • Viviany Viviany Desain Fashion dan Produk Lifestyle, Fakultas Industri Kreatif, Universitas Surabaya, Surabaya - Indonesia
Abstract Views: 401 times
PDF Downloads: 426 times
Keywords: upcycle, willingness to pay, fashion, sustainable fashion, upcycle, fesyen, fesyen berkelanjutan, kesediaan membayar

Abstract

Abstract—Research on clothes waste reduction, especially upcycling suggests that solutions aimed at reducing clothing waste are effective. Based on this ground, further research on upcycling is carried out. As Indonesian millennials can be categorized as ecologically conscious consumers nowadays, it is possible that upcycling can grow more rapidly and become the solution to the world-waste problem. To make that happen, further research needs to be done to increase public and fashion business owners’ awareness. This research examines the willingness to pay for upcycled products in Indonesia. The method of this research is a mixed method - qualitative and quantitative method, which was conducted through online surveys of 30 participants and 5 people in a forum group discussion to gain deeper information. Data were analyzed using van Westendorp’s analysis of price sensitivity. The finding of this research is that the consumers are willing to pay 3-4 times more expensive than the original garment price as the ideal price of upcycled products, the factors influencing it are meaningfulness, familiarity with sustainable products, and quality improvement of the products.

Keywords: upcycle, willingness to pay, fashion, sustainable fashion

 

Abstrak—Penelitian tentang pengurangan limbah pakaian, khususnya upcycling, menunjukkan bahwa solusi yang ditujukan untuk mengurangi limbah pakaian cukup efektif. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, penelitian tentang upcyling banyak dilakukan. Dengan melihat peluang bahwa milenial Indonesia saat ini dapat dikategorikan sebagai konsumen yang sadar lingkungan, maka tidak menutup kemungkinan bahwa upcycling dapat berkembang lebih pesat dari sekarang untuk dapat menjadi solusi dari permasalahan sampah dunia. . Untuk mewujudkannya, perlu dilakukan penelitian lebih lanjut untuk meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat dan pemilik bisnis fashion. Penelitian ini mengkaji tentang kesediaan membayar (WTP) produk hasil upcycling di Indonesia. Metode penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif, menggunakan kuesioner yang diberikan kepada 30 orang, dan FGD meliputi 5 orang, dengan analisis sensitivitas harga milik van Westendorp. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah konsumen bersedia membayar 3-4 kali lebih mahal dari harga garmen asli sebagai harga ideal produk upcycled, dan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya adalah kebermaknaan, keakraban dengan produk yang berkelanjutan, dan peningkatan kualitas produk.

Kata kunci: upcycle, fesyen, fesyen berkelanjutan, kesediaan membayar

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arikunto, S. 2010. Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Armstrong, C., Niinimäki, K., Kujala, S., Karell, E., & Lang, C. (2015). Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland. Journal Of Cleaner Production, 97, 30-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.046

Aus, R., Moora, H., Vihma, M. et al, (2021). Designing for circular fashion : integrating upcycling into conventional garment manufacturing processes. Fash Text 8, 34 .

Bramston, D., & Maycroft, N. (2014) Designing with waste. In E. Karan, O. Pedgley & V. Rognoli (Eds). Materials experience: fundamentals of materials and design. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Brydges, T., (2021). Closing the loop on take, make, waste: Investigating circular economy practices in the Swedish fashion industry. J. Clean. Prod. 293,.

Cai, Y., & Choi, T. (2020). A United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals perspective for sustainable textile and apparel supply chain management.Transportation Research Part E: Logistics And Transportation Review.

Chang, J., Rynhart, G. and Huynh, P., (2016).ASEAN in transformation. Bureau for Employers’ Activities (ACT/EMP), Working Paper No 14 International Labour Office.

Desmet, P., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design.

Gonzalez, Nayelli. (2015). Why Is Slow Fashion So Slow to Catch on? Triplepundit. Retrieved from: https://www.triplepundit.com/story/2015/why-slowfashion-so-slow-catch/58091

Goswami, P., (2008). Is the urban Indian consumer ready for clothing with eco-labels?.32(5),pp.438-446.

Hamzaoui Essoussi, L., & Linton, J. (2010). New or recycled products: how much are consumers willing to pay?. Journal Of Consumer Marketing, 27(5), 458-468. doi: 10.1108/07363761011063358

Hanley, N., & C. L. Spash. (1993). Cost Benefit Analysis and The Environment. England: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Kamble, Z., & Behera, B. (2021). Upcycling textile wastes: challenges and innovations. Textile Progress, 53(2), 65-122.

Kay, T. (1994). Salvo in Germany-Reiner Pilz. SalvoNEWS (99), pp11-14.

Konuk F, (2019). Consumers' willingness to buy and willingness to pay for fair trade food: The influence of consciousness for fair consumption, environmental concern, trust and innovativeness. Food Res Int.

Kawamura, Y. (2005) Fashionology: An Introduction to Fashion Studies,by Yuniya Kawamura. Fashion Theory: Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 413-416.

Laroche, M., Bergeron, J. and Barbaro‐Forleo, G., (2001). Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), pp.503-520.

Lee Young, Halter Holly, Kim K P Johnson and Ju Haewon (2012). Investigating Fashion Disposition with Young Consumers Young Consumers. 14 67-78.

Myers, G. (2014). Designing and Selling Recycled Fashion: Acceptance of Upcycled Secondhand Clothes by Female Consumers, age 25 to 65. North Dakota State University.

Park, H.J. & Lin, L.M. (2018). Exploring attitude- behaviour gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117, 623-628. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025

Parung, C., (2019). How do the Indonesian ecologically conscious millennials value upcycle clothing? IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 703, p.012031.

Shiasi Arani, M., & Shafiizadeh, H. (2019). Investigation of brand familiarity and brand recognition and their relationship with loyalty, repurchase intention, and brand recommendation with mediating role of brand reputation (Case Study: Esteghlal Hotel). Revista Gestão &Amp; Tecnologia, 19(5), 7-29. doi: 10.20397/2177-6652/2019.v19i5.1780

Simonson, I. and Drolet, A., (2003). Anchoring Effects on Consumers' Willingness-to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Singh, J., Sung, K., Cooper, T., West, K., & Mont, O. (2019). Challenges and opportunities for scaling up upcycling businesses –The case of textile and wood upcycling businesses in the UK. Resources, Conservation And Recycling, 150, 104439.

Van Westendorp, P. H. (1976). NSS – Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM) – a new approach to study consumer- perception of prices. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Congress, Venice, 139-167.

Verma, D., & Gupta, S. (2004). Does Higher Price Signal Better Quality? Vikalpa: The Journal For Decision Makers, 29(2), 67-78. doi: 10.1177/0256090920040206

Tey, Y., Brindal, M., & Dibba, H. (2018). Factors influencing willingness to pay for sustainable apparel: A literature review. Journal Of Global Fashion Marketing, 9(2), 129-147.

Yu, S. & Lee, J. (2019). The effects of consumers’ perceived values on intention to purchase upcycled products. Sustainability, 11(4), 1034.doi:10.3390/su11041034

Zhao, J. & Kling, C.L. (2004). Willingness to pay, compensating variation, and the cost of commitment. Economic Inquiry, 42 (3), 503- 517.Scientific Journal, 10(7), 482-497.

Zhi, Y. (2022) The Upcycling and Reconstruction of Garments and Fabrics. Art and Design Review, 10, 72-102. doi: 10.4236/adr.2022.101007.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ha-Brookshire, J. E., & Hodges, N. N. (2009). Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior?: Exploring Used Clothing Donation Behavior. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 27(3), 179–196.

Hanss, D. and Böhm, G. (2012), Sustainability seen from the perspective of consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36: 678-687.

Lee, J. Y. (2013). Investigating fashion disposition with young consumers.Young consumers : insight and ideas for responsible marketers, 14(1).

Miller, K., Hofstetter, R., Krohmer, H. And Zhang, Z., (2011). How Should Consumers’ illingness to Pay be Measured? An Empirical Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(1), pp.172-184.

Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E.P.H. (2008). Consumer- Product Attachment: Measurement and Design Implications.International Journal of Design.

Published
2022-09-02
How to Cite
Parung, C. A. P., & Viviany, V. (2022). Upcycled Products in Indonesia: Factors Influencing Willingness to Pay. Keluwih: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 3(2), 57-69. https://doi.org/10.24123/saintek.v3i2.5100