INTEGRASI SERVQUAL, KANO, DAN KANSEI ENGINEERING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KUALITAS LAYANAN DI SUBCO SPAZIO WORKING SPACE SURABAYA

  • Fiqo Tsavandho Jurusan Teknik Industri / Universitas Surabaya
  • Markus Hartono Jurusan Teknik Industri / Universitas Surabaya
  • Arbi Hidayat Jurusan Teknik Industri / Universitas Surabaya
Abstract Views: 37 PDF - FULL TEXT Downloads: 55
Keywords: Servqual, Kano, Kansei Engineering, Customer Satisfaction, Working Space

Abstract

Abstrak -Untuk meningkatkan kualitas layanan, perlu dilakukan metode integrasi pengukuran kualitas yaitu Servqual, Kano Model, dan Kansei Engineering. Berdasarkan hasil survei terhadap 47 responden, pelanggan dibagi menjadi 2 kelompok pelanggan yaitu kelompok pelanggan harian dan kelompok pelanggan bulanan. Hasil integrasi yang dilakukan terhadap kelompok pelanggan harian terdapat 4 atribut layanan yang memiliki nilai kepuasan negatif yang rendah dan memiliki nilai kepentingan yang tinggi, berkategori one–dimensional dan memiliki hubungan signifikan dengan Kansei Words tertentu yaitu pada atribut layanan ketercukupan tempat duduk, kesesuaian harga dengan fasilitas, kesesuaian harga dengan waktu akses, dan kemudahan pelanggan menyampaikan komplain. Sedangkan untuk kelompok pelanggan bulanan terdapat 4 atribut layanan yaitu pada atribut ketercukupan tempat duduk, keberadaan receptionist di tempatnya saat dibutuhkan, kesesuaian harga dengan fasilitas, dan kesesuaian harga dengan waktu akses. Solusi perbaikan yang dapat dilakukan untuk dapat meningkatkan kepuasan pelanggan Subco Spazio adalah: penambahan jumlah tempat kerja yang nyaman, dan membuat wilayah kerja baru. Perbaikan tersebut diprioritaskan untuk pelanggan harian.

Kata Kunci: Servqual, Kano, Kansei Engineering, Kepuasan Pelanggan, Ruang Perintis.

Abstract –Servqual, Kano model, and Kansei Engineering integration is needed to improve service quality. Based on survey results of 47 respondents, customers are divided into 2 groups of customers, such as daily customer groups and monthly customer groups. Daily customer group itself, there are 4 service attribute which has low negative satisfaction and has high importance, one-dimensional category and has significant relation with certain Kansei Words such as seats adequacy, conformity between price and facility, conformity between price and access time, and ease of customer to complaint. For monthly customer group, there are 4 service attributes such as adequacy of the seat, the presence of receptionist, conformity between price and facility, and conformity between price and access time. Solutions that can be applied to increase Subco Spazio customer satisfaction are: add some comfortable workplaces, and creating new work areas. Those solutions are made for daily customers.

Keywords: Servqual, Kano, Kansei Engineering, Customer Satisfaction, Working Space

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agneslia, E., Wawolumaja, R. Analisis Kualitas Pelayanan Perpustakaan Teknik Universitas Kristen Maranatha Dengan Metoda Servqual. Bandung: Universitas Kristen Maranatha.

Algifari. (2016). Mengukur Kualitas Layanan Dengan Indeks Kepuasan, Metode Importance-Performanced Anaysis (IPA, dan Model Kano. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN.

Ariani, D. (1999). Manajemen Kualitas. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.

ASI. (2003). Diambil kembali dari Benefit of QFD: ASIUSA.com

Barsky, J. dan Nash, L. (2002). Evoking emotion: affective keys to hotel loyalty. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43, 39–46.

Bitner, M.J., (1992). Servicescapes: the impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees. Journal of Marketing, 56, 57–71.

Carey, M.A. (1994). The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing, and interpreting focus group research. In Critical Issues in Qualitative Research Methods (Morse J.M., ed.). Sage: Thousand Oaks, 225-241.

Derbaix, C.M. (1995). The impact of affective reactions on attitudes toward the advertisement and the brand: a step toward ecological validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 470–479.

Dube, L., Cervellon, M.-C. dan Jingyuan, H., (2003). Should consumer attitudes be reduced to their affective and cognitive bases? Validation of a hierarchical model. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 20, 259–272.

Eldin, N. (2002). A Promoting Planning Tool. Quality Function Deployment, Cost Engineering , 44 No 3.

Esteria, K. (2007). Tugas Akhir. Strategi perbaikan Kualitas Layanan Dengan Menggunakan metode Kano dan Triz di Restoran Sriwedari Surabaya. Surabaya: Universitas Surabaya.

Fandy, T. (1997). Strategi Pemasaran. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Fitzsimmons, J., dan Mona, J. (1994). Service Management for Competitive Advantage. New York: McGraw.

Gasperz, V. (2002). Manajemen Kualitas Dalam Industri jasa. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Hariandja, J. dan Ishlah, D. (2013). Tugas Akhir. Strategi perbaikan Kualitas Layanan Dengan Menggunakan metode Kano dan Triz di Restoran Sriwedari Surabaya. Surabaya: Universitas Surabaya.

Hartono, M., dan Chuan, T. K. (2011). How the Kano model contributes to Kansei engineering in service. 990.

Helander, M. (2003). Hedonomics-affective human factors design. 46, 1269–1272.

Kotler, P. (2006). Marketing Management (Millennium Edition ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall International, Inc.

Laros, F.J.M. dan Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., (2005). Emotions in consumer behavior: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1437–1445.

Lim, T., et al. (2010). Producing Graduate Who Meet Employee Expectations: Open and Distance Learning IS a Visible Option. 6.

Lin, I.Y. (2004). Evaluating a servicescape: the effect of cognition and emotion. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 23, 163–178.

Lovelock, C.H. (1991). Services marketing. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

Nagamachi, M., (1995). Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of IndustrialErgonomics, pp.Vol.15 No.1, pp 3-11.

Nagamachi, M., dan Imada, A. S. (1995). Kansei Engineering. an Ergonomic Technology for Product Development , 15, 1.

Parasuraman, A., Berry, L.L., dan Zeithaml, V.A. (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 12–40.

Philips, D.M. dan Baumgartner, H. (2002). The role of consumption emotions in the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12, 243–352.

Schutte, S., et al. (2008). Affective meaning: the Kansei engineering approach. In: H.N.J. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert, eds. Product experience. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd., 477–496

Speziale H.J. dan Carpenter D. (2003). Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

Stephens, N. dan Gwinner, K.P. (1998). Why don’t some people complain? A cognitiveemotive process model of consumer complaint behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 172–189.

Sugiono. (2004). Statistik Non Parametris. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wickens, C. D. dan Hollands, J. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance 3rd Ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Wijaya, T. (2011). Manajemen Kualitas Jasa: Desain Servqual, QFD, dan Kano Disertai Contoh Aplikasi dalam Kasus Penelitian. Jakarta: Indeks.

Wiryawan, I. (2014). Tugas Akhir. Penerapan Integrasi Kano, Kansei dan Servqual ke dalam QFD untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Layanan di BCA KCP Wlingi, Blitar. Surabaya: Universitas Surabaya.

Tan, K., dan Pawitra, T. (2001). Integrating Servqual and Kano’s model into QFD. 428.

Zeelenberg, M. dan Pieters, R. (1999). Comparing service delivery to what might have been. Journal of Service Research, 2, 86–97.
Published
2019-09-01