DIALEKTIKA LEADER-FOLLOWER YANG MEMECAHKAN KONSTRUK SOSIAL LEADERSHIP : Sebuah Pendekatan Otobiografi

  • Samuel Dimas Suryono Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Surabaya
  • Artiawati Mawardi Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Surabaya
  • Teguh Wijaya Mulya Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Surabaya
Abstract Views: 145 times
PDF - FULL TEXT Downloads: 396 times
Keywords: leadership, followership, dialects, social constructivism

Abstract

Leadership is widely researched phenomenon, yet least understandable. This phenomenon can’t be easily understand because most of leadership theory in the early research focuses on small portion of the whole leadership process itself. Seeing leader as sole constructor of leadership and ignoring follower in the process, is contributing wrong assumptions of leadership process. Therefore, through the analysis of leader-follower dialects that seen from social constructivism paradigm, I hope to remodel the social assumptions generated from early research. Through comparation of etymological analysis with early leadership research review, researcher will establish the boundaries between leadership and followership. This boundaries will be used to shape leader-follower dialects construct which then used further to analyze the dyadic level relations perceived by subjects. From this level analysis obtained that leader-follower dialects whil affect the quality of relations between leader and follower, thus affecting the whole efectivity of entire organization, therefore arguing that leader is not the most important factor in organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2012). Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 367-390.

Bass, B. M. (1981). Stogdills Handbook of Leadership : A Survey of Theory and Research. New York: The Free Press.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications, Inc.

McKinley, J. (2015). Critical Argument and Writer Identity: Social Constructivism as a Theoretical Framework for EFL Academic Writing. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 12(3), 184-207.

Meindl, J. R. (1990). On leadership: An alternative to the conventional wisdom. Research in Organizational Behavior, 159-203.

Tenni, C., Smyth, A., & Boucher, C. (2003). The Researcher as Autobiographer: Analysing Data Written About Oneself. The Qualitative Report Vol. 8.

Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Love, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2013). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, xxx-xxx.

van Vugt, M., & Ahuja, A. (2011). Naturally Selected: The Evolutionary Science of Leadership.New York: HarperCollins.
Published
2018-03-01