Reconciling Work and Family Responsibilities: A Global Perspective
Abstract Views:
6 times
PDF-Full Text Downloads:
4 times
Abstract
The issue of reconciling work and family responsibilities is a major concern for working men and women whether they live in industrialized and developed nations or developing nations. In- creasingly working adults in developing countries are struggling to reconcile work and family respon- sibilities. Although they will vary depending on the cultural context, effective family friendly policies require managers to be cognizant of a number of local factors that influence employees’ work and personal lives. These factors include culture and traditions, the role of key stakeholders, public poli- cies, community resources and infrastructure, and workplace practices and demographics.
Isu memadukan pekerjaan dan tugas keluarga merupakan masalah utama bagi pria dan pe- rempuan yang bekerja baik mereka hidup di negara industri dan maju atau di negara berkembang. Makin banyak pekerja dewasa di negara berkembang berusaha dengan keras memadukan pekerjaan- nya dengan kewajiban keluarga. Sekalipun hal tersebut bervariasi tergantung konteks budayanya, ke- bijakan ramah keluarga yang efektif menuntut para manajer untuk bertanggung jawab terhadap se- jumlah faktor lokal yang memengaruhi kerja para pekerja dan kehidupan pribadinya. Faktor-faktor ini meliputi budaya dan tradisi, peran kunci mereka yang terkait, kebijakan umum, sumber daya dan in- frastruktur masyarakat, dan praktik-praktik di tempat kerja dan demografi.
Downloads
References
Bowes, J. M. (2005). Emphasizing the family in work-family research: A review of current re- search and recommendations for future direc- tions. In S.A.Y. Poelmans (Ed.), Work and fami- ly: An international research perspective (pp. 415-438). New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bailyn, L., Drago, R., & Kochan, T. (2001). Inte- grating work and family life: A holistic approach. Report for Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Work- Family Policy Network.
Clancy, M., & Tata, J. (2005). A global perspective on balancing work and family. International Journal of Management, 22(2), 234-241.
Eaton, S. C. (2003). If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and per- ceived performance. Industrial Relations, 42(2), 145-167.
Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechan- isms linking work and family: clarifying the rela- tionship between work and family constructs. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 179-199.
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Greenhaus, J., & Singh, R. (003). Work-family lin- kages. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & P. Raskin (Eds.), Sloan work-family encyclopedia. Chestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Work and Family Research Network. Retrieved April 3, 2006, from http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/encyclopedia_template.p hp?id=263.
Hein, C. (2005). Reconciling work and family re- sponsibilities: Practical ideas from global ex- perience. Geneva, Switzerland: International La- bor Organization.
Haas, L. L., Hwang, P., & Russell, G. (2000). Organizational change and gender equity: Interna- tional perspectives on fathers and mothers at the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Heymann, J. (2006). Forgotten families: Ending the growing crisis confronting children and working parents in the global economy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heymann, J., Earle, A., & Hanchate, A. (2004). Bringing a global perspective to community work and family: An examination of extended work hours in families in four countries. Community, Work and Families, 7, 247-272.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Cultures' consequences: Inter- national differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Hudson (2005). The case for work/life balance: Closing the gap between policy and practice. Sydney: Hudson Australia and New Zealand.
International Labor Organization. (1999). Key indicators of the labor market. Geneva, Switzerland: ILO.
Jackson, S., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801-830.
Kamerman, S. (2002). Early childhood care and education and other family policies and programs in South-East Asia. Paris: Unesco.
Kelleher, E. J., & Cobe, F. S. (2003). Strategic planning for human resources. In J. Scott, J. Edwards, & N. Raju (Eds.), The human resources program evaluation handbook (pp. 514-534). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Korabik, K., Lero, D., & Ayman, Z. (2003). A multi-level approach to cross cultural work-family research: A micro and macro perspective. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(3), 289-304.
Lu, L. Gilmour, R., Kao, S-F, & Huang, M-T. (2006). A cross-cultural study of work/family demands, work/family conflict and wellbeing: The Taiwanese versus British. Career Develop- ment International, 11(1), 9-27.
Magnani, E., & Rammahan, A. (2007). The effect of elderly care-giving on female labour supply in Indonesia. Presented at the 5th International Research Conference on Social Security, Warsaw.
Meera, K. (2006). Work and family: Cross-national comparisons. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Koss- ek, & P. Raskin (Eds.), Work-family encyclope- dia. Chestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
Metcalfe, C. (1998). The stakeholder corporation. Business Ethics: A European Review 7(1), 30-36.
Meyerson, D., & Martin, J. (1987). Cultural change: An integration of three different views. Journal of Management Studies, 24, 623-647.
Ministry of manpower and transmigration, Republic of Indonesia. (2005). Guidelines: Equal employment opportunity in Indonesia. Jakarta, Republic of Indonesia: Equal Employment Opportunity Task Force.
New South Wales, Department of Industrial Relations. (2003). Family friendly ideas for small business (Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia). Available at www.workandfamily.nsw.gov.au
Patrickson, M., & Hartmann, L. (2001). Human resource management in Australia: Prospects for the twenty-first century. International Journal of Manpower, 22(3), 198-206.
Poelmans, S. A. Y., O'Driscoll, M., & Beham, B. (2005). An overview of international research on the work-family interface. In S. A. Y. Poelmans (Ed.), Work and family: An international research perspective (pp. 3-46). New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rothausen-Vange, T. (2005). Family diversity. In M. Pitt-Catsouphes, E. E. Kossek, & P. Raskin (Eds.), Work-family encyclopedia. Chestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Work and Family Research Network. Retrieved April 3, 2006, from http://wfnetwork. bc.edu/encyclopedia_template.php?id=1138.
Shapiro, A., & Noble, K. (2001, Spring). A work/life lens helps bring a global workforce into focus. It's About Tim, 2, 1-2.
Sheridan, A., & Conway, L. (2001). Workplace flexibility: Reconciling the needs of employers and employees. Women in Management Review 16(1), 5-11.
Spinks, N. (2003). Work/life around the world (Building a global work-life strategy). Paper pre- sented at the Designing the Future, 7th Annual Work/Life Conference, Orlando, Florida, Febru- ary 26-28.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Westview, Boulder: CO. World Bank Group. (2000). World development indicators 2000. Washington, DC: World Bank.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
DOI:


