Responses of Religion and Science to the Threats of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia

[Respon Agama dan Sains Terhadap Ancaman Pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia]

  • Wawan Kurniawan Laboratorium Psikologi Politik, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Indonesia
  • Joevarian Hudiyana Laboratorium Psikologi Politik, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Indonesia
  • Hamdi Muluk Laboratorium Psikologi Politik, Fakultas Psikologi, Universitas Indonesia
Abstract Views: 286 PDF - Full Text Downloads: 240
Keywords: religion, agama, COVID-19, belief in science, keyakinan terhadap sains

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented various responses in society. A number of individuals have believed in its existence and conducted health protocols properly, but there are also those who have done the opposite. During a pandemic, belief in science influences actions and responses in society. However, individuals often do not believe in scientific findings, such as the existence of the virus causing the COVID-19 pandemic (SARS-CoV-2). A number of previous studies have often assumed that science is in conflict with religion. But is religion truly the opposite of science? This article aims to look at the role of belief in science in Indonesian society, in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic, and is hoped to be read by various parties such as the general public, scientists, to policymakers. Furthermore, this article may help in understanding the position of science and religion under certain conditions, while also being able to examine the differences in responses that occur. In Indonesia, religion and science have not been at odds in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. The two each have their respective roles in providing explanations of the problems that have occured. However, there are groups of religious fundamentalists and their perception in viewing science that require attention in further studies.

Pandemi COVID-19 menghadirkan berbagai respon di masyarakat. Beberapa individu percaya akan keberadaannya dan melakukan protokol kesehatan dengan baik, akan tetapi ada pula yang melakukan hal sebaliknya. Pada masa pandemi, keyakinan terhadap sains (belief in science) memberi pengaruh pada tindakan serta tanggapan masyarakat. Akan tetapi, individu kerap tidak percaya dengan temuan ilmiah, seperti halnya tentang keberadaan virus penyebab pandemi COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2). Sejumlah studi sebelumnya seringkali menganggap bahwa sains bertentangan dengan agama. Namun, apakah agama adalah faktor yang memang berkebalikan dengan sains? Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melihat peran belief in science pada masyarakat Indonesia dalam merespon pandemi COVID-19, dan diharapkan dapat dibaca oleh berbagai kalangan seperti masyarakat awam, ilmuwan, hingga pembuat kebijakan. Selain itu, artikel ini dapat membantu memahami posisi sains dan agama dalam kondisi tertentu, serta mampu menelaah perbedaan respon yang terjadi. Di Indonesia, agama dan sains tidak berseberangan dalam merespon kondisi pandemi COVID-19. Kedua hal tersebut memiliki perannya masing-masing dalam memberikan penjelasan atas permasalahan yang terjadi. Walaupun demikian, terdapat kelompok fundamentalisme agama dan persepsinya atas sains yang patut mendapat perhatian dalam studi selanjutnya.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allum, N., Sturgis, P., Tabourazi, D., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2008). Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: A meta-analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 17(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159

Barua, Z., Barua, S., Aktar, S., Kabir, N., & Li, M. (2020). Effects of misinformation on COVID-19 individual responses and recommendations for resilience of disastrous consequences of misinformation. Progress in Disaster Science, 8, 100119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100119

Bernard, R., Bowsher, G., Sullivan, R., & Gibson-Fall, F. (2021). Disinformation and epidemics: Anticipating the next phase of biowarfare. Health Security, 19(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0038

Blancke, S., De Smedt, J., De Cruz, H., Boudry, M., & Braeckman, J. (2012). The implications of the cognitive sciences for the relation between religion and science education: The case of evolutionary theory. Science & Education, 21(8), 1167-1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9402-z

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) News Indonesia. (2020, March 19). Virus Corona: Ijtima Jamaah Tabligh di Gowa dan penahbisan uskup di Ruteng, Presiden Jokowi evaluasi acara keagamaan di tengah wabah COVID-19 [Coronavirus: Ijtema of Jamaah Tabligh in Gowa and bishop ordination in Ruteng, Indonesian President Jokowi evaluates religious activities during the COVID-19 pandemic]. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). Retrieved January 13, 2022 from https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-51956103

Brooke J. H. (2018). The ambivalence of scientific naturalism: A response to Mark Harris. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 53(4), 1051-1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12463

Brzezinski, A., Kecht, V., Van Dijcke, D., & Wright, A. L. (2020, April). Belief in science influences physical distancing in response to COVID-19 lockdown policies (Becker Friedman Institute for Economics at the University of Chicago Working Paper No. 2020-56). https://repec.bfi.uchicago.edu/RePEc/pdfs/BFI_WP_202056.pdf

Buana, D. R. (2020). Analisis perilaku masyarakat Indonesia dalam menghadapi pandemi virus corona (COVID-19) dan kiat menjaga kesejahteraan jiwa [Behavior analysis of the Indonesian society in handling the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and tips in managing psychological well-being]. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i, 7(3), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i3.15082

Charta Politika. (2021). Rilis survei nasional: Evaluasi kebijakan & peta politik masa pandemi [National survey release: Evaluation of policies and political maps during the pandemic]. Charta Politica. Retrieved December 3, 2021 from https://www.chartapolitika.com/rilis-survei-nasional-evaluasi-kebijakan-peta-politik-masa-pandemi/

Collins, F. S. (2006). The language of God: A scientist presents evidence for belief. Simon & Schuster. https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/The-Language-of-God/Francis-S-Collins/9781416542742

Dagnall, N., Denovan, A., Drinkwater, K. G., & Parker, A. (2019). An evaluation of the belief in science scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00861

D'Andrade, R. (2008). A study of personal and cultural values: American, Japanese, and Vietnamese. Palgrave Macmillan New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612099

Davoodi, T., & Lombrozo, T. (2021). Explaining the existential: Scientific and religious explanations play different functional roles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001129

Dietz, T. (2013). Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 3), 14081-14087. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212740110

Druckman, J. N., Ognyanova, K., Baum, M. A., Lazer, D., Perlis, R. H., Volpe, J. D., Santillana, M., Chwe, H., Quintana, A., & Simonson, M. (2021). The role of race, religion, and partisanship in misperceptions about COVID-19. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 638-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220985912

Ecklund, E. H., & Park, J. Z. (2009). Conflict between religion and science among academic scientists? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (JSSR), 48(2), 276-292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01447.x

Ecklund, E. H., Scheitle, C. P., Peifer, J., & Bolger, D. (2017). Examining links between religion, evolution views, and climate change skepticism. Environment and Behavior, 49(9), 985-1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516674246

Evans, E. M. (2000). The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: Journal of Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 221-254. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/mpq/vol46/iss2/4

Evans, J. H. (2011). Epistemological and moral conflict between religion and science. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (JSSR), 50(4), 707-727. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01603.x

Falade, B. (2019). Religious and traditional belief systems coexist and compete with science for cultural authority in West Africa. Cultures of Science, 2(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/209660831900200102

Farias, M., Newheiser, A. -K., Kahane, G., & de Toledo, Z. (2013). Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1210-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.008

Fitria, V., & Al Giffari, H. A. (2021). The language of science and religion: An approach to understand the encounter between science and religion according to Ian G. Barbour. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.40453

Gervais, W. M. (2015). Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution. Cognition, 142, 312-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.011

Gottlieb, S., & Lombrozo, T. (2018). Can science explain the human mind? Intuitive judgments about the limits of science. Psychological Science, 29(1), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617722609

Gould, S. J. (2011). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. Ballantine Books. (Original work published 1999). https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/70014/rocks-of-ages-by-stephen-jay-gould/

Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374-378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706

Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1), aau4586. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586

Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 88-110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_1

Herdiansah, A. G. (2016). Peran organisasi masyarakat (ormas) dan lembaga swadaya masyarakat (LSM) dalam menopang pembangunan di Indonesia [The role of community organization and non-government organization in supporting development in Indonesia]. Sosioglobal: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Sosiologi, 1(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.24198/jsg.v1i1.11185

Hudiyana, J., Putra, I. E., Ariyanto, A. A., Brama, G. H. T., & Muluk, H. (2019). Can the activation of analytic cognitive style determine endorsement of secular belief? Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 13, e30. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.23

Jackson, J. C., Caluori, N., Gray, K., & Gelfand, M. (2021). The new science of religious change. American Psychologist, 76(6), 838-850. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000818

Johnson, G. (2006). A free-for-all on science and religion. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/21/science/21belief.html

Joslyn, M. R., & Sylvester, S. M. (2019). The determinants and consequences of accurate beliefs about childhood vaccinations. American Politics Research, 47(3), 628-649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17745342

Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Wittlin, M., Slovic, P., Ouellette, L. L., Braman, D., & Mandel, G. (2012). The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change, 732(2), 737-735. https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1547

Legare, C. H., Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K. S., & Harris, P. L. (2012). The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development. Child Development, 83(3), 779-793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x

Liquin, E. G., Metz, S. E., & Lombrozo, T. (2020). Science demands explanation, religion tolerates mystery. Cognition, 204, 104398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104398

Łowicki, P., Marchlewska, M., Molenda, Z., Karakula, A., & Szczepańska, D. (2022). Does religion predict coronavirus conspiracy beliefs? Centrality of religiosity, religious fundamentalism, and COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 187, 111413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111413

McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001-2010. The Sociological Quarterly: Official Journal of the Midwest Sociological Society, 52(2), 155-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x

McPhetres, J., & Zuckerman, M. (2018). Religiosity predicts negative attitudes towards science and lower levels of science literacy. PloS ONE, 13(11), e0207125. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207125

McPhetres, J., Jong, J., & Zuckerman, M. (2021). Religious Americans have less positive attitudes toward science, but this does not extend to other cultures. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(4), 528-536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620923239s

Morisseau, T., Branch, T. Y., & Origgi, G. (2021). Stakes of knowing the truth: A motivational perspective on the popularity of a controversial scientific theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 708751. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708751

Morrison, M., Duncan, R., & Parton, K. (2015). Religion does matter for climate change attitudes and behavior. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0134868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134868

Muhtada, D. (2020) Agama dan mitigasi wabah COVID-19 [Religion and the mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic]. Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Commentaries. Retrieved January 13, 2022 from https://csis.or.id/publications/agama-dan-mitigasi-wabah-covid-19

Muluk, H., Milla, M. N., Yustisia, W., Arifin, H. H., Hudiyana, J., & Shadiqi, A. M. (2019, July 2-5). Re-conceptualizing political ideology: The construction of three dimensions scale of ideology in the Indonesian context [Conference presentation]. XVI European Congress of Psychology, Moscow, Russia. https://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.5cf632c7af72dec2b0554e7d

Mwangi, W. P. (2019). Need to make people believe science-science is reliable and means truth. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(7), 272-287. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.77024

Pelčić, G., Karačić, S., Mikirtichan, G. L., Kubar, O. I., Leavitt, F. J., Tai, M. C. -T., Morishita, N., Vuletić, S., & Tomašević, L. (2016). Religious exception for vaccination or religious excuses for avoiding vaccination. Croatian Medical Journal, 57(5), 516-521. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2016.57.516

Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). Everyday consequences of analytic thinking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(6), 425-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415604610

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011

Preston, J., & Epley, N. (2009) Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 238-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.013

Russell, B., & Sluckin, T. (2016). The impact of science on society. Routledge. (Original work published 1952). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315624785

Rutjens, B. T., Heine, S. J., Sutton, R. M., & van Harreveld, F. (2018). Attitudes towards science. In J. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, volume 57 (1st ed.) (pp. 125-165). Academic Press. https://www.elsevier.com/books/advances-in-experimental-social-psychology/olson/978-0-12-814689-7

Rutjens, B. T., Sutton, R. M., & van der Lee, R. (2018). Not all skepticism is equal: Exploring the ideological antecedents of science acceptance and rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(3), 384-405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217741314

Rutjens, B. T., van der Linden, S., van der Lee, R., & Zarzeczna, N. (2021). A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(4), 513-517. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211009708

Rutjens, B. T., Sengupta, N., van der Lee, R., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Martens, J. P., Rabelo, A., & Sutton, R. M. (2022). Science skepticism across 24 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(1), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211001329

Sager, C. (Ed.). (2008). Voices for evolution (3rd ed.). The National Center for Science Education. https://ncse.ngo/voices-evolution-0

Stosic, M. D., Helwig, S., & Ruben, M. A. (2021). Greater belief in science predicts mask-wearing behavior during COVID-19. Personality and Individual Differences, 176, 110769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110769

Strassberg, B. A. (2005). Magic, religion, science, technology, and ethics in the postmodern world. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 40(2), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2005.00664.x

Susanty, H. (2020). Serba serbi perilaku dan persepsi masyarakat Indonesia dalam menghadapi pandemi COVID-19 [Details of the Indonesian society behavior and perception in experiencing the COVID-19 pandemic]. Pusat Penyuluhan Sosial. Retrieved December 18, 2021 from https://puspensos.kemensos.go.id/serba-serbi-perilaku-dan-persepsi-masyarakat-indonesia-dalam-menghadapi-pandemi-covid-19

Taber, C. S., Cann, D., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9075-8

Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., Drury, J., Dube, O., Ellemers, N., Finkel, E. J., Fowler, J. H., Gelfand, M., Han, S., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Kitayama, S., Mobbs, D., Napper, L. E., Packer, D. J., Pennycook, G., Peters, E., Petty, R. E., Rand, D. G., Reicher, S. D., Schnall, S., Shariff, A., Skitka, L. J., Smith, S. S., Sunstein, C. R., Tabri, N., Tucker, J. A., van der Linden, S., van Lange, P., Weeden, K. A., Wohl, M. J. A., Zaki, J., Zion, S. R., & Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z

Washburn, A. N., & Skitka, L. J. (2018). Science denial across the political divide: Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to deny attitude-inconsistent science. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 972-980. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617731500

Zahratunnisa (2020). Peran ulama dalam mitigasi pandemi COVID-19 [The role of clerics in the mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic]. ADALAH: Buletin Hukum & Keadilan, 4(1), 259-269. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i1.16496

Published
2022-07-25
How to Cite
Kurniawan, W., Hudiyana, J., & Muluk, H. (2022). Responses of Religion and Science to the Threats of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: [Respon Agama dan Sains Terhadap Ancaman Pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 37(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v37i2.4913