Quietly Crowded: The Moderating Role of Positive Relationship Quality in Cyberspace on Loneliness and Subjective Well-Being in Urban Communities
DOI:
Abstract Views:
252 times
PDF - Full Text Downloads:
205 times
Abstract
Loneliness is commonly experienced by individuals in urban communities because of the difficulties in establishing close relationships in urban settings. One way to deal with loneliness in the real world is to find virtual friends in cyberspace. In other words, high level of loneliness can cause social relationship in the virtual world to increase and social relationship in the real world to decrease. The social compensation model hypothesized that higher quality interaction with virtual friends could reduce loneliness levels and ultimately increase one's subjective well-being because this interaction is considered a safe relationship and a preference for those who feel isolated. By utilizing the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for Adults - Short Version (SELSA-S), the Positive Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) Scale, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), this study found that positive relationship quality in cyberspace (with virtual friends) significantly moderated the association between loneliness levels and subjective well-being (N = 300). Therefore, this study’s results show that not all online interactions are detrimental to individual’s mental health. Also, individuals in urban communities should considering focusing more on increasing the quality of interactions, instead of increasing the quantity or number of friendships.
Downloads
References
Adiwena, B. Y., & Djuwita, R. (2019). Nature relatedness as a predictor of psychological well-being: A study of Indonesian urban society. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 34(4), 175-187. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v34i4.2578
Appel, H., Gerlach, A. L., & Crusius, J. (2016). The interplay between Facebook use, social comparison, envy, and depression. Current Opinion in Psychology, 9, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.10.006
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Berezan, O., Krishen, A. S., Jenveja, A. (2018). Loneliness and social media: The interplay of physical and virtual social space. In A. S. Krishen, & O. Berezan (Eds.), Marketing and humanity: Discourses in the real world (pp. 48-67). Cambridge Scholars Publishing. https://www.cambridgescholars.com/product/978-1-5275-1850-6
Buczak-Stec, E., König, H. -H., & Hajek, A. (2023). Sexual orientation and psychosocial factors in terms of loneliness and subjective well-being in later life. The Gerontologist, 63(2), 338-349. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnac088
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203805534
Calderon Leon, M. D., Guassi Moreira, J. F., Saragosa-Harris, N. M., Waizman, Y. H., Sedykin, A., Peris, T. S., & Silvers, J. A. (2022). Parent and friend relationship quality and links to trajectories of loneliness during the first year of college. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-022-01416-6
Chalise, H. N., Saito, T., Takahashi, M., & Kai, I. (2007). Relationship specialization amongst sources and receivers of social support and its correlations with loneliness and subjective well-being: A cross sectional study of Nepalese older adults. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 44(3), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2006.07.001
Chen, H. -T., & Li, X. (2017). The contribution of mobile social media to social capital and psychological well-being: Examining the role of communicative use, friending and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 958-965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.011
Del Valle, S. Y., Hyman, J. M., Hethcote, H. W., & Eubank, S. G. (2007). Mixing patterns between age groups in social networks. Social Networks, 29(4), 539-554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.005
Di Bucchianico, A. (2008). Coefficient of determination (R2). In F. Ruggeri, R. S. Kenett, F. W. Faltin, V. Nair, D. Montgomery, & S. Keller-McNulty (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in quality and reliability. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061572.eqr173
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
DiTommaso, E., Brannen, C., & Best, L. A. (2004). Measurement and validity characteristics of the short version of the Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for Adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 99-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164403258450
Franssen, T., Stijnen, M., Hamers, F., & Schneider, F. (2020). Age differences in demographic, social and health-related factors associated with loneliness across the adult life span (19-65 years): A cross-sectional study in the Netherlands. BioMed Central (BMC) Public Health, 20: 1118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09208-0
Fröding, B., & Peterson, M. (2012). Why virtual friendship is no genuine friendship. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(3), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9284-4
Gere, J., & Schimmack, U. (2013). When romantic partners’ goals conflict: Effects on relationship quality and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9314-2
Granic, I., Morita, H., & Scholten, H. (2020). Beyond screen time: Identity development in the digital age. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 31(3), 195-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820214
Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Educational International. https://www.pearson.com/store/p/multivariate-data-analysis-pearson-new-international-edition/GPROG_A100061040593_learnernz-availability/9781292021904
Hall, J. A., Kearney, M. W., & Xing, C. (2019). Two tests of social displacement through social media use. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1396-1413. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1430162
Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2009) Loneliness. In H. Reis, & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 985-990). SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/encyclopedia-of-human-relationships/book231034
Kato, T. A., Shinfuku, N., Sartorius, N., & Kanba, S. (2017). Loneliness and single-person households: Issues of kodokushi and hikikomori in Japan. In N. Okkels, C. B. Kristiansen, & P. Munk-Jørgensen (Eds.), Mental health and illness in the city (pp. 205-219). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2327-9_9
Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2020). A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
Marttila, E., Koivula, A., & Räsänen, P. (2021). Does excessive social media use decrease subjective well-being? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between problematic use, loneliness and life satisfaction. Telematics and Informatics, 59: 101556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101556
Miller, J. D. (2021). Longitudinal Study of American Youth, 1987-1994, 2007-2011, 2014-2017 (ICPSR 30263). Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR30263.v7
Natanael, Y. & Novanto, Y. (2020). Pengujian model pengukuran congeneric, tau-equivalent dan parallel pada Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) [Congeneric, tau-equivalent, and parallel measurement model testing on Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS)]. Psympathic: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 7(2), 285-598. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v7i2.6405
Pauly, T., Lay, J. C., Scott, S. B., & Hoppmann, C. A. (2018). Social relationship quality buffers negative affective correlates of everyday solitude in an adult lifespan and an older adult sample. Psychology and Aging, 33(5), 728-738. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000278
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014
Putri, L. H., & Kusdiati, S. (2023). Pengaruh loneliness terhadap perilaku cyberbullying pada mahasiswa Jawa Barat [Effects of loneliness in cyberbullying on West Java university students]. Bandung Conference Series: Psychology Science, 3(1), 550-557. https://doi.org/10.29313/bcsps.v3i1.5812
Reinecke, L., & Trepte, S. (2014). Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030
Riana, F. (2022, September 4). Teman virtual bagi yang kesepian [Virtual friend for those that are lonely]. Koran Tempo. https://koran.tempo.co/read/topik/476212/mengenal-jasa-sleep-call-yang-marak-di-media-sosial
Rogge, R. D., Fincham, F. D., Crasta, D., & Maniaci, M. R. (2017). Positive and negative evaluation of relationships: Development and validation of the Positive–Negative Relationship Quality (PN-RQ) scale. Psychological Assessment, 29(8), 1028-1043. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000392
Smith, D., Leonis, T., & Anandavalli, S. (2021). Belonging and loneliness in cyberspace: Impacts of social media on adolescents’ well-being. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1898914
Smith, K. J., & Victor, C. (2019). Typologies of loneliness, living alone and social isolation, and their associations with physical and mental health. Ageing and Society, 39(8), 1709-1730. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000132
Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2007). Positive psychology: The scientific and practical explorations of human strengths. Sage Publications. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-11869-000
Stocker, C. M., Gilligan, M., Klopack, E. T., Conger, K. J., Lanthier, R. P., Neppl, T. K., O'Neal, C. W., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2020). Sibling relationships in older adulthood: Links with loneliness and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000586
Tu, Y., & Zhang, S. (2015). Loneliness and subjective well-being among Chinese undergraduates: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 124, 963-980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0809-1
VanderWeele, T. J., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2012). On the reciprocal association between loneliness and subjective well-being. American Journal of Epidemiology, 176(9), 777-784. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws173
Vogel, E. A., Rose, J. P., Roberts, L. R., & Eckles, K. (2014). Social comparison, social media, and self-esteem. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 3(4), 206-222. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000047
Wilson, R. L., & Wilson, R. (2014). Understanding emotional development: Providing insight into human lives (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315849331
Ye, Y., & Lin, L. (2015). Examining relations between locus of control, loneliness, subjective well-being, and preference for online social interaction. Psychological Reports, 116(1), 164-175. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.09.PR0.116k14w3
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
