Editorial | TIM RaDar as a Practical Screening Tool for IMRaD Articles: Consensual Publication Standards Among Indonesian Psychological Journal Editors [TIM RaDar Sebagai Alat Screening Praktis untuk Artikel IMRaD: Standar Publikasi Konsensual]
DOI:
Abstract Views:
1860 times
PDF - Full Text Downloads:
1117 times
Abstract
TIM RaDaR is an initiative to discover common standards for scientific publications in the field of psychology in Indonesia. Through this standard, authors (i.e., researchers, students, or lecturers) may prepare their manuscripts to meet the basic criteria for scientific publication. The writing criteria comprise of Title, Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion, and References. This article also provides a checklist to aid authors and journal editors in evaluating manuscripts to be published. As an initiative, this article aims to become a starting point in synergizing better quality scientific publications in the field of psychology in Indonesia.
TIM RaDaR adalah sebuah inisiatif untuk menggali standar bersama publikasi ilmiah psikologi Indonesia. Melalui standar ini, penulis (peneliti, mahasiswa, atau dosen) dapat mempersiapkan tulisan yang mereka susun untuk memenuhi kriteria dasar publikasi ilmiah. Kriteria tersebut mencakup penulisan Judul, Pendahuluan, Metode, Hasil dan Diskusi, serta Pustaka Acuan (Title, Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion, and References). Tulisan ini juga memberikan sebuah checklist yang dapat digunakan sebagai alat bantu bagi penulis dan pengelola jurnal untuk mengevaluasi tulisan yang telah disusun. Sebagai suatu inisiatif, tulisan ini menjadi titik awal sinergi publikasi ilmiah psikologi Indonesia yang lebih bermutu di masa mendatang.
Downloads
References
Abraham, J. (2021). Ethical clearance: Untuk apa dan oleh siapa? [Ethical clearance: For what and whom?] [PowerPoint slides]. Universitas Bina Nusantara - SlideShare. https://bit.ly/etikariset
American Psychological Association [APA]. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). Author. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
American Psychological Association [APA] Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards [JARS]. (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63(9), 839-851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.839
American Society of Civil Engineers [ASCE]. (2019). State-of-the-art review proposal guidelines. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Library. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784479018.ap01
Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal Article Reporting Standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
Armağan, A. (2013). How to write an introduction section of a scientific article? Turkish Journal of Urology, 39(Supplement 1), 8-9. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2013.046
Ball, P. (2002). Paper trail reveals references go unread by citing authors. Nature, 420(6916), 594-594. https://doi.org/10.1038/420594a
Bavdekar, S. B. (2016). Formulating the right title for a research. Journal of The Association of Physicians of India, 64(2), 53-56. https://www.japi.org/q2d4b4b4/formulating-the-right-title-for-a-research-article
Belcher, W. L. (2019). Writing your journal article in twelve weeks: A guide to academic publishing success (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/W/bo26985005.html
Beleslin, I., Njegovan, B. R., & Vukadinović, M. S. (2017, October). Clickbait titles: Risky formula for attracting readers and advertisers. Proceedings of the XVII (17th) International Scientific Conference on Industrial Systems (IS’17), 364-369. https://www.iim.ftn.uns.ac.rs/is17/papers/65.pdf
Cooper, H. (2020). Reporting quantitative research in psychology: How to meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000178-000
Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T., & Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162782 | https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1348/014466599162782
Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2008). Framework of problem-based research: A guide for novice researchers on the development of a research-worthy problem. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 11, 17-33. https://doi.org/10.28945/438
EQUATOR Network. (n.d.) Reporting guidelines. EQUATOR Network. https://www.equator-network.org/reporting-guidelines/
Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Surabaya. (2020). Hasil survei standar publikasi ilmiah [Data set]. Universitas Surabaya. https://s.id/survei-standar-publikasi-psikologi-indonesia
Gray, J. A. (2019). Paragraphs in medical writing. AME Medical Journal (AMJ), 4:28, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21037/amj.2019.05.02
Guillemard, M. (2017). Three strategies to help you write clearly for a lay audience. Medical Writing, 26(1), 35-37. https://journal.emwa.org/writing-better/three-strategies-to-help-you-write-clearly-for-a-lay-audience/
Harzing, A. -W. & Kroonenberg, P. (2017). The mystery of the phantom reference. Harzing.com: Research in International Management. https://harzing.com/publications/white-papers/the-mystery-of-the-phantom-reference
Jacso, P. (2006). Deflated, inflated and phantom citation counts. Online Information Review, 30(3), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610675816
Jaya, E. S. (2020). Editorial note: How do we evaluate your manuscript? Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia (Makara Hubs-Asia), 24(2), 99-100. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.1311220
Kazak, A. E. (2018). Editorial: Journal Article Reporting Standards. American Psychologist, 73(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000263
Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., & Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying Sleeping Beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) of the United States of America, 112(24), 7426-7431. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424329112
Lange, L. L. (2005). Sleeping Beauties in psychology: Comparisons of "hits" and "missed signals" in psychological journals. History of Psychology, 8(2), 194-217. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.8.2.194
Larsson, K. S. (1995). The dissemination of false data through inadequate citation. Journal of Internal Medicine (JIM), 238(5), 445-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.1995.tb01222.x
Leng, R. (2020). Citation distortion. The Matter of Facts. https://www.the-matter-of-facts.com/post/citation-and-the-distortion-of-meaning
Lestari, M. D. (2021). "More than just a verbatim": Enhancing the quality of Indonesian psychological qualitative studies. Jurnal Psikologi Ulayat: Indonesian Journal of Indigenous Psychology, 8(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.24854/jpu481
Lester, J. D., & Lester J. D., Jr. (2015). Writing research papers: A complete guide (15th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/product/Lester-Writing-Research-Papers-A-Complete-Guide-paperback-15th-Edition/9780321952950.html
Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal Article Reporting Standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
Levitt, H. M. (2020). Reporting qualitative research in psychology: How to meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards (Revised Edition). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000179-000
Lingard, L., & Watling, C. (2016). It's a story, not a study: Writing an effective research paper. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 91(12), e12. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001389
Page, M. J., Moher, D., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Mcdonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., Mckenzie, J. E. (2021). PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal (BMJ), 372, n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Roberts, J. (2013). Developing and implementing a reporting guidelines policy: Notes from a small journal. EQUATOR Network. https://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/EQUATOR-Workshop-Short-Presentation.pdf
Roberts, J. L., Houle, T. T., Loder, E. W., Penzien, D. B., Turner, D. P., & Rothrock, J. F. (2014). Establishing a coherent reporting guidelines policy in health journals. In D. Moher, D. G. Altman, K. F. Schulz, I. Simera, & E. Wager (Eds.), Guidelines for reporting health research: A user's manual (1st ed.) (pp. 309-317). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118715598.ch29
Schulz, K., Altman, D., & Moher, D. (2010a). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials [Correspondence]. BioMed Central (BMC) Medicine, 8, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-18
Schulz, K., Altman, D., & Moher, D. (2010b). CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials [Research Method and Reporting]. British Medical Journal (BMJ), 340, c332. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., The PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. British Medical Journal (BMJ), 349, g7647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
Siaputra, I. B., Abraham, J., & Lukman, L. (2019). ANJANI (Anjungan Integritas Akademik Indonesia): Kolaborasi nasional meningkatkan integritas akademik [Indonesian Academic Integrity Platform: National collaboration in increasing academic integrity] [PowerPoint slides]. Universitas Surabaya - DocPlayer. https://bit.ly/anjanisosialisasi
Simkin, M. V., & Roychowdhury, V. P. (2002). Read before you cite! Cornell University - arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043
Simkin, M. V., & Roychowdhury, V. P. (2006). Do you sincerely want to be cited? Or: Read before you cite. Significance, 3(4), 179-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2006.00202.x
Stang, A. (2010). Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. European Journal of Epidemiology, 25(9), 603-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z
Stang, A., Jonas, S., & Poole, C. (2018). Case study in major quotation errors: A critical commentary on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. European Journal of Epidemiology, 33(11), 1025-1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0443-3
Steel, C. M. (1996). Read before you cite. The Lancet, 348(9021), 144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66108-9
Stevens, J. R. (2017). Replicability and reproducibility in comparative psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:862. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00862
Taylor & Francis Author Services. (2020). How to write a journal article. Taylor & Francis Online. https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/writing-a-journal-article/
Tullu, M. S. (2019). Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 13(5), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_685_18
University of Washington. (n.d.). Writing effective purpose statements. University of Washington Web Server. https://faculty.washington.edu/ezent/imwps.htm
van Raan, A. F. J. (2004). Sleeping Beauties in science. Scientometrics, 59(3), 467-472. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:scie.0000018543.82441.f1
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Epidemiology, 18(6), 800-804. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577654
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
