Quality Time: What Baby Boomers Need for Parenting Their Generation Z Children
[Waktu Berkualitas: Hal yang Dibutuhkan Baby Boomers Dalam Pengasuhan Anak Generasi Z]
DOI:
Abstract Views:
1193 times
PDF - Full Text Downloads:
472 times
Abstract
Changes in values, culture, and technology bring new demands on Generation Z parenting, especially by parents of the Baby Boomers generation. Although previous studies considered the generational gap between Baby Boomers parents and Generation Z as a myth, preliminary study raises an urgency to explore further the experiences of Baby Boomers parents in raising children from Generation Z. This study aims to explore the experiences of Baby Boomer parents in facing challenges and viewing opportunities in parenting Generation Z children. Utilizing a qualitative approach of Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), this study involved three participants from the Baby Boomers generation who have children from Generation Z in Y city. The main data of this study were the transcripts of in-depth interviews, which lasted 90-120 minutes for each participant. The results of the analysis produced three themes, being: (1) the need to build parent-child closeness to bridge the generation gap; (2) parents' efforts to understand the world of children from Generation Z; and (3) parents' expectations for future of Generation Z adolescents. This study offered the implications for providing evidence from the latest study on parenting practices to uncover challenges and opportunities from the experience of Baby Boomers raising Generation Z.
Perubahan nilai, budaya, dan teknologi membawa tuntutan baru dalam pola asuh Generasi Z, khususnya oleh orang tua dari generasi Baby Boomers. Meskipun studi sebelumnya menganggap kesenjangan generasi antara orang tua Baby Boomers dan generasi muda Generasi Z sebagai mitos, study pendahuluan memunculkan urgensi untuk menggali lebih jauh pengalaman orang tua Baby Boomers dalam mengasuh anak dari Generasi Z. Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi pengalaman orang tua Baby Boomers dalam menghadapi tantangan dan memandang peluang dalam mengasuh Generasi Z. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif teknik Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), studi ini melibatkan tiga partisipan dari generasi Baby Boomers yang memiliki anak dari Generasi Z di kota Y. Data utama studi ini adalah transkrip wawancara mendalam yang berlangsung selama 90-120 menit untuk tiap partisipan. Hasil analisis menghasilkan tiga tema, yaitu: (1) adanya kebutuhan membangun kedekatan orang tua-anak untuk menjembatani kesenjangan generasi; (2) upaya orang tua untuk memahami dunia anak dari Generasi Z; dan (3) harapan orang tua terhadap masa depan remaja Generasi Z. Studi ini menawarkan implikasi untuk menyediakan bukti dari studi terkini tentang praktik pengasuhan untuk mengungkap tantangan dan peluang pengalaman Baby Boomers mengasuh Generasi Z.
Downloads
References
Abidin, R. R. (2012). Parenting Stress Index, fourth edition (PSI-4). Psychological Assessment Resources. https://www.parinc.com/products/pkey/333
Afiatin, T. (2013). Family attachment, self-esteem, religiosity, assertiveness, and sense of community as predictors of adolescent happiness. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 29(1), 38-49. https://anima.ubaya.ac.id/index.php?menu=articles&eid=1409020833&actsub=yes&eidsub=1409021173
Aggarwal, M., Rawat, M. S., Singh, S., Srivastava, S., & Gauba, P. (2017). Generation gap: An emerging issue of society. International Journal of Engineering Technology Science and Research (IJETSR), 4(9), 973-983. https://www.ijetsr.com/images/short_pdf/1505709796_973-983-ieted296_ijetsr.pdf
Alase, A. (2017). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies (IJELS), 5(2), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.5n.2p.9 | https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJELS/article/view/3400
Ali, H., Purwandi, L., Nugroho, H., Firdaus, K., & Huda, N. (2020). Indonesia Gen Z and Millenial report 2020: The battle of our generation. Alvara. https://alvara-strategic.com/indonesia-gen-z-and-millenial-report-2020/
American Psychological Association (APA). (2018, October 30). APA Stress in AmericaTM survey: Generation Z stressed about issues in the news but least likely to vote. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2018/10/generation-z-stressed
Andriono, M. A., & Sumargi, A. M. (2019). Challenging behaviors in young children: The role of parenting consistency in a multigenerational family. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 34(2), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v34i2.2201
Arredondo, E. M., Morello, M., Holub, C., & Haughton, J. (2014). Feasibility and preliminary findings of a church-based mother-daughter pilot study promoting physical activity among young Latinas. Family and Community Health: The Journal of Health Promotion & Maintenance, 37(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000015
Aulia, C. (2020). Dinamika psikologis orang tua generasi Baby Boomers mengasuh anak Generasi Z [Psychological dynamics of Baby Boomer parents in nurturing Generation Z children] [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada]. Universitas Gadjah Mada - Electronic Thesis & Dissertations Repository. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/190093
Bandura, A., & National Institute of Mental Health. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Bencsik, A., & Machova, R. (2016). Knowledge sharing problems from the viewpoint of intergeneration management. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance (ICMLG 2016), 42-50. https://www.proquest.com/openview/82fd67d73db7bcc1cdcfd53f6a1195e6/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1796417
Bibi, F., Chaudhry, G. A., Awan, E. A., & Tariq, B. (2013). Contribution of parenting style in life domain of children. International Organization of Scientific Research (IOSR) Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 12(2), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1229195
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 993-1028). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-01926-019
Chicca, J., & Shellenbarger, T. (2018). Connecting with Generation Z: Approaches in nursing education. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(3), 180-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.008
Cilliers, E. J. (2021). Reflecting on social learning tools to enhance the teaching-learning experience of Generation Z learners. Frontiers in Education, 5: 606533. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.606533
Culp-Roche, A., Hampton, D., Hensley, A., Wilson, J., Thaxton-Wiggins, A., Otts, J. A., Fruh, S., & Moser, D. K. (2020). Generational differences in faculty and student comfort with technology use. SAGE Open Nursing, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960820941394
Deater-Deckard, K. (2004). Parenting stress. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300103939.001.0001
Durden, T. (2018, July 4). Step aside Millennials: Here comes Generation Z. TalkMarkets. https://talkmarkets.com/content/us-markets/step-aside-millennials-here-comes-generation-z?post=181834
Farrell, W. C., & Phungsoonthorn, T. (2020). Generation Z in Thailand. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 20(1), 25-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595820904116
Gentina, E., Tang, T. L. -P., & Dancoine, P. -F. (2018). Does Gen Z’s emotional intelligence promote iCheating (cheating with iPhone) yet curb iCheating through reduced nomophobia? Computers & Education, 126, 231-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.011
Helsper, E. J. (2016). Inequalities in digital literacy: Definitions, measurements, explanations and policy implications. In Brazilian Internet Steering Committee (Ed.), ICT Households 2015: Survey on the use of information and communication technologies in Brazilian households (pp. 175-185). The London School Economic and Political Science Research Online. https://eprints.lse.ac.uk/68329/
Jain, A., & Maheshwari, M. (2020). An exploratory study on intergenerational learning in Indian IT workspace. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 7(2), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093720944275
Jena, R. K. (2016). Effect of generation gap on organizational commitment: A case study of Ferro-Alloy Industries in India. Global Business Review, 17(3_suppl), 76S-89S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916631085
Johnson, A. O. (2015). Test review: Parenting Stress Index, Fourth Edition (PSI-4). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 698-702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914556069
Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D., Karila, L., & Billieux, J. (2014). Internet addiction: A systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 20(25), 4026-4052. https://doi.org/10.2174/13816128113199990617
La Kahija, Y. F. (2017). Penelitian fenomenologis: Jalan memahami pengalaman hidup [Phenomenological research: A path to understanding life experiences]. Kanisius.
La Rose, T., & Detlor, B. (2021). Social work digital storytelling project: Digital literacy, digital storytelling, and the makerspace. Research on Social Work Practice, 31(6), 599-609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731521992427
Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2003). When generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work (1st ed.). HarperCollins. https://www.harpercollins.com/products/when-generations-collide-lynne-c-lancasterdavid-stillman?variant=32122887602210
Lerner, R., Brennan, A. L., Noh, E. R., & Wilson, C. (1998). The parenting of adolescents and adolescents as parents: A developmental contextual perspective. Proceedings of Parenthood in America. https://parenthood.library.wisc.edu/Lerner/Lerner.html
Lestari, S., Faturochman, & Kim, U. (2010). Trust in parent-child relationship among undergraduate students: Indigeneous psychological analysis. Jurnal Psikologi, 37(2), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.7698 | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpsi/article/view/7698
Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., & Staksrud, E. (2018). European research on children’s Internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816685930
Lorensia, A., Pratama, A. M., & Yudiarso, A. (2016). Intrepretative phenomenological analysis: Perception of health risk of smoking and smoking cessation among pharmacy students. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 31(4), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v31i4.576
Magnis‐Suseno, F. (2003). Etika Jawa: Sebuah analisa falsafi tentang kebijaksanaan hidup Jawa (Edisi ke-9) [Javanese ethics: A philosophical analysis of the Javanese life wisdom (9th ed.)]. Gramedia.
Matsunaga, M. (2021). Testing the theory of communication and uncertainty management in the context of digital transformation with transformational leadership as a moderator. International Journal of Business Communication. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/23294884211023966
Mushtaq, S., Soroya, S. H., & Mahmood, K. (2021). Reading habits of Generation Z students in Pakistan: Is it time to re-examine school library services? Information Development, 37(3), 389-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666920965642
Oerther, S., & Oerther, D. B. (2021). Review of recent research about parenting Generation Z pre-teen children. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 43(11), 1073-1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945920988782
Oh, J., & Kang, J. -H. (2021). Converting a digital minority into a digital beneficiary: Digital skills to improve the need for cognition among Korean older adults. Information Development, 37(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919888570
Özmete, E., & Bayoğlu, A. S. (2009). Parent-young adult conflict: A measurement on frequency and intensity of conflict issues. The Journal of International Social Research, 2(8), 314-322. https://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/articles/parentyoung-adult-conflict-a-measurement-on-frequency-and-intensity-of-conflict-issues.pdf
Pearce, C. (2008). The truth about Baby Boomer gamers: A study of over-forty computer game players. Games and Culture, 3(2), 142-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412008314132
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia [The Government of the Republic of Indonesia]. (2002). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 23 tahun 2002 tentang perlindungan anak [Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 23 year 2002 concerning child protection]. Database Peraturan - Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum - Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/44473/uu-no-23-tahun-2002
Polat, S., Çelik, Ç., & Okçu, Y. (2019). School administrators’ perspectives on teachers from different generations: SWOT analysis. SAGE Open, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861499
Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently?. On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
Reginasari, A., & Afiatin, T. (2019). Pengasuhan digital dan inkongruensi pengalaman di media sosial antara remaja dan orang tua [Digital parenting and incongruence experiences on social media among teenagers and parents]. Proceeding of Temu Ilmiah Nasional XI Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia (IPPI), 2019, 71-85. https://psychologyforum.umm.ac.id/files/file/Prosiding%20IPPI%202019/9_%20Annisa%20Reginasari%2C%20Tina%20Afiatin.pdf
Reginasari, A., Afiatin, T., Subandi, S., Patria, B., & Muchlisah, M. (2021). Adaptation for harmony: A thematic analysis study of Internet parental monitoring strategy in Indonesian context. The Qualitative Report, 26(10), 3234-3261. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4979
Ruswahyuningsih, M. C., & Afiatin, T. (2015). Resiliensi pada remaja Jawa [Resilience in Javanese youth]. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP), 1(2), 96-105. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamajop.7347 | https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamajop/article/view/7347
Sasongko, J. P. (2015, 16 September). KPAI: Kekerasan anak dipicu buruknya pengasuhan orang tua [The Indonesian Child Protection Commission: Child violence is triggered by poor parenting]. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20150916103500-20-79056/kpai-kekerasan-anak-dipicu-buruknya-pengasuhan-orang-tua
Schallmo, D. R. A., & Williams, C. A. (2018). Digital transformation now! Guiding the successful digitalization of your business model. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72844-5
Schenarts, P. J. (2020). Now arriving: Surgical trainees from Generation Z. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(2), 246-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.09.004
Schwarz, B., Albert, I., Trommsdorff, G., Zheng, G., Shi, S., & Nelwan, P. R. (2010). Intergenerational support and life satisfaction: A comparison of Chinese, Indonesian, and German elderly mothers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5-6), 706-722. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110372197
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017). Generation Z: Educating and engaging the next generation of students. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 22(3), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21293
Shorey, S., Chan, V., Rajendran, P., & Ang, E. (2021). Learning styles, preferences and needs of Generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103247
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and research (1st ed.). SAGE Publications. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/interpretative-phenomenological-analysis/book250130#:~:text=Theory%2C%20Method%20and%20Research&text=Interpretative%20phenomenological%20analysis%20(IPA)%20is,of%20their%20major%20life%20experiences.
Stillman, D., & Stillman, J. (2018). Generasi Z: Memahami karakter generasi baru yang akan mengubah dunia kerja [Gen Z @ work: How the next generation is transforming the workplace] (L. Jusuf, Trans.). Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://www.gramedia.com/products/generasi-z-memahami-karakter-generasi-baru-yang-akan-mengub
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow and Company Inc..
Sumargi, A., Sofronoff, K., & Morawska, A. (2014). Parenting practices and parenting programs in Indonesia: A literature review and current evidence. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 29(4), 186-198. https://anima.ubaya.ac.id/index.php?menu=articles&eid=1409020833&actsub=yes&eidsub=1413746404
Swanzen, R. (2018). Facing the generation chasm: The parenting and teaching of Generations Y and Z. International Journal of Child, Youth & Family Studies (IJCYFS), 9(2), 125-150. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs92201818216
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the Internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill.
White, J. M., Martin, T. F., & Adamsons, K. (2018). Family theories: An introduction (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071872604
Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health, 15(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400302
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
