Editorial | Stop the Academic Bullying: Our Internal Reflections for a Fairer Peer Reviews [Hentikan Perundungan Akademik: Refleksi Internal untuk Penilaian Sejawat yang Lebih Adil]
DOI:
Abstract Views:
863 times
PDF - Full Text Downloads:
495 times
Abstract
Academic bullying in peer reviews is a cultural problem. This Editorial Note is intended to identify the unhelpful comments/critiques and to highlight the impact of unprofessional peer reviews toward the well-being and career development of fellow researchers. We acknowledge that we are part of the problems, and the necessary steps are needed to break the chain of the academic bullying culture in peer reviews. New guidelines for editors and reviewers are part of the solutions to promote constructive comments, as well as stronger internal consolidation throughout the peer reviews process.
Perundungan akademik dalam penilaian sejawat (peer review) adalah sebuah permasalahan kultur. Catatan Editorial ini bertujuan mengindentifikasi komentar atau kritik yang tidak membangun, serta menggarisbawahi dampak penilaian sejawat yang tidak profesional terhadap kesejahteraan dan pengembangan karir sesama peneliti. Kami menyadari bahwa kami merupakan bagian dari permasalahan ini, dan diperlukan langkah-langkah untuk memutus rantai kultur perundungan akademik dalam penilaian sejawat. Pedoman baru bagi editor dan mitra bestari merupakan bagian dari solusi untuk mendorong komentar yang konstruktif, serta konsolidasi internal yang lebih kuat dalam proses penilaian sejawat.
Downloads
References
Brown, A. M. L. (2015). How not to be Reviewer #2. Ashley ML Brown. https://amlbrown.com/2015/11/10/how-not-to-be-reviewer-2/
Clements, J. C. (2020a). Don’t be harsh in peer review: How to reckon with comments from reviewers who use ‘being critical’ as a justification to be mean. Nature, 585, 472. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02512-0
Clements, J. C. (2020b). Don’t be a prig in peer review: Jeff C. Clements reckons with a recent set of reviewer comments that used ‘being critical’ as a justification to be mean. Nature Careers Community. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02512-0
Gerwing, T. G., Gerwing, A. M. A., Avery-Gomm, S., Choi, C. -Y., Clements, J. C., & Rash, J. A. (2020). Quantifying professionalism in peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 5:9, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x
Mahmoudi, M. (2020). A survivor’s guide to academic bullying. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 1091 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00937-1
Meriläinen, M., Käyhkö, K., Kõiv, K., & Sinkkonen, H. -M. (2019). Academic bullying among faculty personnel in Estonia and Finland. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(3), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1591678
Meriläinen, M., Puhakka, H., & Sinkkonen, H. -M. (2015). Students’ suggestions for eliminating bullying at a university. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 43(2), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2014.950943
Pörhölä, M., Almonkari, M., & Kunttu, K. (2019). Bullying and social anxiety experiences in university learning situations. Social Psychology of Education, 22(3), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09496-4
Pörhölä, M., Cvancara, K., Kaal, E., Kunttu, K., Tampere, K., & Torres, M. B. (2020). Bullying in university between peers and by personnel: Cultural variation in prevalence, forms, and gender differences in four countries. Social Psychology of Education, 23(1), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09523-4
Romero-Olivares, A. L. (2019). Review with care. Science, 366(6461), 146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.366.6461.146
Silbiger, N. J., & Stubler, A. D. (2019). Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM. PeerJ: Life & Environment, 7:e8247, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247
Why publish in Frontiers? (n.d.). Frontiers in Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology#why-submit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
