Editorial | Stop the Academic Bullying: Our Internal Reflections for a Fairer Peer Reviews [Hentikan Perundungan Akademik: Refleksi Internal untuk Penilaian Sejawat yang Lebih Adil]

  • Edwin Adrianta Surijah Queensland University of Technology & Universitas Dhyana Pura
Abstract Views: 149 PDF - Full Text Downloads: 129
Keywords: academic bullying, perundungan akademik, peer review, penilaian sejawat, publication process, proses publikasi, unprofessional peer review, penilaian sejawat yang tidak profesional


Academic bullying in peer reviews is a cultural problem. This Editorial Note is intended to identify the unhelpful comments/critiques and to highlight the impact of unprofessional peer reviews toward the well-being and career development of fellow researchers. We acknowledge that we are part of the problems, and the necessary steps are needed to break the chain of the academic bullying culture in peer reviews. New guidelines for editors and reviewers are part of the solutions to promote constructive comments, as well as stronger internal consolidation throughout the peer reviews process.


Perundungan akademik dalam penilaian sejawat (peer review) adalah sebuah permasalahan kultur. Catatan Editorial ini bertujuan mengindentifikasi komentar atau kritik yang tidak membangun, serta menggarisbawahi dampak penilaian sejawat yang tidak profesional terhadap kesejahteraan dan pengembangan karir sesama peneliti. Kami menyadari bahwa kami merupakan bagian dari permasalahan ini, dan diperlukan langkah-langkah untuk memutus rantai kultur perundungan akademik dalam penilaian sejawat. Pedoman baru bagi editor dan mitra bestari merupakan bagian dari solusi untuk mendorong komentar yang konstruktif, serta konsolidasi internal yang lebih kuat dalam proses penilaian sejawat.


Download data is not yet available.


Aulia, F. (2016). Bullying experience in primary school children. Schoulid: Indonesian Journal of School Counseling, 1(1), 28-32. https://doi.org/10.23916/schoulid.v1i1.37.28-32

Brown, A. M. L. (2015). How not to be Reviewer #2. Ashley ML Brown. https://amlbrown.com/2015/11/10/how-not-to-be-reviewer-2/

Clements, J. C. (2020a). Don’t be harsh in peer review: How to reckon with comments from reviewers who use ‘being critical’ as a justification to be mean. Nature, 585, 472. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02512-0

Clements, J. C. (2020b). Don’t be a prig in peer review: Jeff C. Clements reckons with a recent set of reviewer comments that used ‘being critical’ as a justification to be mean. Nature Careers Community. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02512-0

Gerwing, T. G., Gerwing, A. M. A., Avery-Gomm, S., Choi, C. -Y., Clements, J. C., & Rash, J. A. (2020). Quantifying professionalism in peer review. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 5:9, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x

Mahmoudi, M. (2020). A survivor’s guide to academic bullying. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 1091 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00937-1

Meriläinen, M., Käyhkö, K., Kõiv, K., & Sinkkonen, H. -M. (2019). Academic bullying among faculty personnel in Estonia and Finland. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(3), 241-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1591678

Meriläinen, M., Puhakka, H., & Sinkkonen, H. -M. (2015). Students’ suggestions for eliminating bullying at a university. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 43(2), 202-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2014.950943

Pörhölä, M., Almonkari, M., & Kunttu, K. (2019). Bullying and social anxiety experiences in university learning situations. Social Psychology of Education, 22(3), 723-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09496-4

Pörhölä, M., Cvancara, K., Kaal, E., Kunttu, K., Tampere, K., & Torres, M. B. (2020). Bullying in university between peers and by personnel: Cultural variation in prevalence, forms, and gender differences in four countries. Social Psychology of Education, 23(1), 143-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09523-4

Romero-Olivares, A. L. (2019). Review with care. Science, 366(6461), 146. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.366.6461.146

Silbiger, N. J., & Stubler, A. D. (2019). Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM. PeerJ: Life & Environment, 7:e8247, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247

Why publish in Frontiers? (n.d.). Frontiers in Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology#why-submit
How to Cite
Surijah, E. A. (2021). Editorial | Stop the Academic Bullying: Our Internal Reflections for a Fairer Peer Reviews [Hentikan Perundungan Akademik: Refleksi Internal untuk Penilaian Sejawat yang Lebih Adil]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v36i1.4018