CARE Principles to Encourage Adoptions of Open-Source Software in Behavioral Sciences
[Prinsip CARE Sebagai Dukungan Penggunaan Piranti Lunak Sumber Terbuka Dalam Ilmu Perilaku]
DOI:
Abstract Views:
230 times
PDF - Full Text Downloads:
158 times
Abstract
Open-source apps and software allow psychological science researchers to collect and analyze data in a more economical and accountable manner. For those who are not convinced yet, this short letter offers a series of arguments and recommendations for adopting open-source apps for data collection and analysis. We put particular emphasis on how using open-source apps support the open science movement by allowing researchers to share research instruments, anonymized data, and data analysis script. Sharing, in turn, facilitates audit, replication, and collaboration, which benefit science in general.
Aplikasi dan perangkat lunak sumber terbuka (open-source) memungkinkan ilmuwan psikologi untuk mengumpulkan dan menganalisis data dengan cara yang lebih ekonomis dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Bagi mereka yang belum yakin, surat pendek ini menawarkan serangkaian argumen dan rekomendasi untuk mengadopsi aplikasi sumber terbuka untuk pengumpulan dan analisis data. Kami memberikan penekanan khusus pada bagaimana penggunaan aplikasi sumber terbuka mendukung gerakan sains terbuka dengan memungkinkan ilmuwan berbagi instrumen penelitian, data yang dianonimkan, dan skrip analisis data. Berbagi data, instrumen, dan skrip analisis, pada gilirannya, akan memudahkan audit, replikasi, dan kolaborasi, yang bermanfaat bagi ilmu pengetahuan secara umum.
Downloads
References
Artino, A. R., Jr., Driessen, E. W., & Maggio, L. A. (2019). Ethical shades of gray: International frequency of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education. Academic Medicine, 94(1), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412
Basrul, & Sofyan, Z. (2023). Digital piracy: Factors on using software piracy in Islamic higher education. Digital Zone: Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 14(1), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.31849/digitalzone.v14i1.13176 | https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/dz/article/view/13176
Bowman, N. D., & Keene, J. R. (2018). A layered framework for considering open science practices. Communication Research Reports, 35(4), 363-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2018.1513273
Gopalakrishna, G., Riet, T. G., Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE, 17(2): e0263023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953
Kathawalla, U. -K., Silverstein, P., & Syed, M. (2021). Easing into open science: A guide for graduate students and their advisors. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1): 18684. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18684
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Brooks, B., Brumbaugh, C. C., Cemalcilar, Z., Chandler, J., Cheong, W., Davis, W. E., Devos, T., Eisner, M., Frankowska, N., Furrow, D., Galliani, E. M., Hasselman, F., Hicks, J. A., Hovermale, J. F., Hunt, S. J., Huntsinger, J. R., IJzerman, H., John, M. -S., Joy-Gaba, J. A., Kappes, H. B., Krueger, L. E., Kurtz, J., Levitan, C. A., Mallett, R. K., Morris, W. L., Nelson, A. J., Nier, J. A., Packard, G., Pilati, R., Rutchick, A. M., Schmidt, K., Skorinko, J. L., Smith, R., Steiner, T. G., Storbeck, J., Swol, L. M. V., Thompson, D., Veer, A. E. V., Vaughn, L. A., Vranka, M., Wichman, A. L., Woodzicka, J. A., & Nosek, B. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45(3), 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., Batra, R., Berkics, M., Bernstein, M. J., Berry, D. R., Bialobrzeska, O., Binan, E. D., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Busching, R., Rédei, A. C., Cai, H., Cambier, F., Cantarero, K., Carmichael, C. L., Ceric, F., Chandler, J., Chang, J. -H., Chatard, A., Chen, E. E., Cheong, W., Cicero, D. C., Coen, S., Coleman, J. A., Collisson, B., Conway, M. A., Corker, K. S., Curran, P. G., Cushman, F., Dagona, Z. K., Dalgar, I., Rosa, A. D., Davis, W. E., Bruijn, M. D., Schutter, L. D., Devos, T., Vries, M. D., Doğulu, C., Dozo, N., Dukes, K. N., Dunham, Y., Durrheim, K., Ebersole, C. R., Edlund, J. E., Eller, A., English, A. S., Finck, C., Frankowska, N., Freyre, M. -A., Friedman, M., Galliani, E. M., Gandi, J. C., Ghoshal, T., Giessner, S. R., Gill, T., Gnambs, T., Gómez, Á., González, R., Graham, J., Grahe, J. E., Grahek, I., Green, E. G. T., Hai, K., Haigh, M., Haines, E. L., Hall, M. P., Heffernan, M. E., Hicks, J. A., Houdek, P., Huntsinger, J. R., Huynh, H. P., IJzerman, H., Inbar, Y., Innes-Ker, A. H., Jiménez-Leal, W., John, M. -S., Joy-Gaba, J. A., Kamiloğlu, R. G., Kappes, H. B., Karabati, S., Karick, H., Keller, V. N., Kende, A., Kervyn, N., Knežević, G., Kovacs, C., Krueger, L. E., Kurapov, G., Kurtz, J., Lakens, D., Lazarević, L. B., Levitan, C. A., Lewis, N. A., Jr., Lins, S., Lipsey, N. P., Losee, J. E., Maassen, E., Maitner, A. T., Malingumu, W., Mallett, R. K., Marotta, S. A., Međedović, J., Mena-Pacheco, F., Milfont, T. L., Morris, W. L., Murphy, S. C., Myachykov, A., Neave, N., Neijenhuijs, K., Nelson, A. J., Neto, F., Nichols, A. L., Ocampo, A., O’Donnell, S. L., Oikawa, H., Oikawa, M., Ong, E., Orosz, G., Osowiecka, M., Packard, G., Pérez-Sánchez, R., Petrović, B., Pilati, R., Pinter, B., Podesta, L., Pogge, G., Pollmann, M. M. H., Rutchick, A. M., Saavedra, P., Saeri, A. K., Salomon, E., Schmidt, K., Schönbrodt, F. D., Sekerdej, M. B., Sirlopú, D., Skorinko, J. L. M., Smith, M. A., Smith-Castro, V., Smolders, K. C. H. J., Sobkow, A., Sowden, W., Spachtholz, P., Srivastava, M., Steiner, T. G., Stouten, J., Street, C. N. H., Sundfelt, O. K., Szeto, S., Szumowska, E., Tang, A. C. W., Tanzer, N., Tear, M. J., Theriault, J., Thomae, M., Torres, D., Traczyk, J., Tybur, J. M., Ujhelyi, A., Aert, R. C. M. V., Assen, M. A. L. M. V., van der Hulst, M., van Lange, P. A. M., Veer, A. E. V., Vásquez-Echeverría, A., Vaughn, L. A., Vázquez, A., Verniers, L. D. V., Verschoor, M., Voermans, I. P. J., Vranka, M. A., Welch, C., Wichman, A. L., Williams, L. A., Wood, M., Woodzicka, J. A., Wronska, M. K., Young, L., Zelenski, J. M., Zhijia, Z., & Nosek, B. A. (2018). Many labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, J., Ly, A., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Matzke, D., Wild, A., Knight, P., Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., & Wagenmakers, E. -J. (2019). JASP: Graphical statistical software for common statistical designs. Journal of Statistical Software, 88(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v088.i02
Mardalis, A., & Putra S., D. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan software bajakan di kalangan mahasiswa [Factors influencing pirated software usage in university students]. Benefit: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 16(2), 99-105. https://hdl.handle.net/11617/4475
Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., du Sert, N. P., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E. -J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1: 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021
Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018). Psychology’s Renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 511-544. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Opensource.com. (2024). What is open source? Open Source. https://opensource.com/resources/what-open-source
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534-547. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association (OASPA), & the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). (2022). Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing (Ver. 4). Committee on Publication Ethics. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.12
The R Foundation. (n.d.). The R Project for statistical computing. The R Foundation. https://www.r-project.org/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
