Not to Instantly Increase Manuscript Quantity, but to Accelerate Breakthroughs in Psychology: The Essence of Letter to the Editor (LtE)
[Bukan Untuk Meningkatkan Kuantitas Naskah Secara Instan, Melainkan Mengakselerasi Terobosan di Bidang Ilmu Psikologi: Intisari Surat Kepada Editor]
DOI:
Abstract Views:
633 times
PDF - Full Text Downloads:
442 times
Abstract
In the field of psychology, we witness and experience rapid development of ideas about humans, especially in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0, where psychology will accept the influence of cybernetic ideas. As a researcher in psychology who is diligent in observing human behavior, repeatedly in our minds, various "hypotheses" about the dynamics of human behavior complexes emerge. Especially in Indonesia, the fertile place where the complex dynamics is wrapped in cultural diversity. It is urgent to publish these “hypothetical thoughts” - also a response to the results of peer studies - in a solid, communicative, and persuasive form; so that it can be followed up by peers with pleasure. This is one of the pathways for the development of psychological science which, honestly and regretfully, is still rare by scientific journals of psychology in Indonesia. The way we communicate psychological science, thus, is no longer "accommodated" by one or two forms of scientific publications, such as original articles or reviews (both narrative and systematic). The world of Indonesian scientific publications can learn from the world of journalistic publications that have already accustomed to the communication between the "citizens" of the media. As an example is The Jakarta Post which has a specific rubric for Letter to Editor (LtE) which is very passionate. Hans Selye once wrote one of the legendary Letter to Editors (LtEs), and that letter opened the way for scientific studies on stress. Therefore, ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal encourages the readers to send their extraordinary ideas through Letter to Editor (LtE). Following up on this invitation, we will hold activities and develop supporting products. The existence of training, assistance, and guidelines for writing Letter to Editor (LtE) is expected to foster Letter to Editor (LtE) writing habits as an alternative to quality publications, and not as a new variant of academic integrity deviations.
Di bidang psikologi, kita menyaksikan dan mengalami perkembangan pesat gagasan tentang manusia, terutama di era Revolusi Industri 4,0, ketika psikologi akan menerima pengaruh gagasan sibernetika. Sebagai peneliti psikologi yang tekun mengamati perilaku manusia, tentu berulang kali terbesit dalam benak kita, berbagai “hipotesis” tentang dinamika kompleks perilaku manusia. Terutama di Indonesia, tempat subur di mana dinamika kompleks itu dibalut dengan keanekaragaman budaya hidup. Sangat mendesak untuk menerbitkan sejumlah “besit hipotetis” itu - juga respons terhadap hasil studi sejawat - dalam bentuk yang padat, komunikatif, dan persuasif; sehingga dapat ditindaklanjuti para sejawat dengan senang hati. Inilah salah satu jalur pengembangan sains psikologi yang, secara jujur dan menyesal, masih langka ditapaki oleh jurnal ilmiah psikologi di Indonesia. Cara kita mengkomunikasikan sains psikologi, dengan demikian, tidak memadai lagi "ditampung" oleh satu atau dua bentuk publikasi ilmiah, seperti artikel orisinal atau reviu (baik naratif maupun sistematik). Dunia publikasi ilmiah Indonesia dapat belajar dari dunia publikasi jurnalistik yang telah lebih dahulu membiasakan kekomunikatifan antar-"warga" media tersebut. Sebagai contoh adalah The Jakarta Post yang memiliki rubrik spesifik Letter to Editor (LtE) yang sangat bergairah. Hans Selye pernah menulis salah satu Letter to Editor (LtE) yang legendaris, dan suratnya membuka jalan bagi studi ilmiah tentang stres. Maka dari itu, ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal mendorong pembaca untuk mengirimkan ide luar biasa mereka melalui Letter to Editor (LtE). Menindaklanjuti undangan ini, kami akan menyelenggarakan kegiatan dan mengembangkan produk pendukung. Adanya pelatihan, pendampingan, dan pedoman penulisan Letter to Editor (LtE) diharapkan dapat menumbuhkan kebiasaan penulisan Letter to Editor (LtE) sebagai alternatif publikasi berkualitas, dan bukan sebagai varian baru penyimpangan integritas akademik.
Downloads
References
Alharthy, A., Faqihi, F., Noor, A., Memish, Z. A., & Karakitsos, D. (2022). Co-infection of human immunodeficiency virus, herpes simplex virus-2 and SARS-CoV-2 in a patient with false-negative real-time polymerase chain reaction results. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 63(6), 345-347. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2020158
Altman, D. G., & Simera, I. (2016). A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: The long road to the EQUATOR Network. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 109(2), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076815625599
Andrade, A. (2020). Could letters to the editor, such as publication in an indexed journal with an impact factor, be valid as a formal published article? [Online Forum Post]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Could-letters-to-the-editor-such-as-publication-in-an-indexed-journal-with-an-impact-factor-be-valid-as-a-formal-published-article
Bétry, C., Disse, E., & Chambrier, C. (2017). Letter to the editor - Need for more collaboration to manage nutritional complications after bariatric surgery. Clinical Nutrition, 36(2), 608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2017.01.026
Beyebach, M., Neipp, M. -C., Solanes-Puchol, Á., & Martin-del-Rio, B. (2021). Bibliometric differences between WEIRD and non-WEIRD countries in the outcome research on solution-focused brief therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:754885. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.754885
Biswas, A. K., & Kircherr, J. (2015, April 11). Prof, no one is reading you. The Strait Times. Retrieved from https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/prof-no-one-is-reading-you
Chubin, D., & Garfield, E. (1980). Letters to the Editor: Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 2(1), 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016602
Dkhar, S. A. (2018). Letter to editor: Its importance and drawbacks. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 5(10), 4634-4636. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20184021
Fong, J. M. N., & Anantham, D. (2021). Health ethics in COVID-19: No better time for solidarity. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 62(3), 155-156. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2020083
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Himawan, K. K. (2021). The question of ethical review for psychological research in Indonesia: Need and importance [Menyoal uji etik dalam penelitian psikologi di Indonesia: Seberapa perlu dan pentingkah?]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 36(2), 326-340. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v36i2.4059
Horton, R. (2002). Post publication criticism and the shaping of clinical knowledge. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 287(21), 2843-2847. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2843
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). (2019). Recommendations for the conducting, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. https://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
Joaquin, J. J., & Tan, R. R. (2021). The lost art of short communications in academia. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9633-9637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04192-7
Kotani, K., & Manabe, T. (2020). Special considerations in the management of COVID-19 in rural and remote areas. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 63(3), 172. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2020112
Mashuri, A., Putra, I. E., & Montiel, C. (2022). Political psychology of Southeast Asia. Journal of Social and Political Psychology (JSPP), 10(2), 491-500. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.10133
National Institute for Health Research. (n.d.). About PROSPERO. National Institute for Health Research. Retrieved February 2, 2023 from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#aboutpage
Neghina, R., & Neghina, A. M. (2011). How to build a scientific publishing career based on hundreds of letters-to-the-editor: “The art of loss”. Accountability in Research, 18(4), 247-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.584761
Lek, S. M., Liang, W., Ooi, S. H. A., & Tay, G. C. A. (2022). Surgical management of benign idiopathic tracheo-oesophageal fistula: A case report. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 63(5), 288-290. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2022077
Liew, C. J. W. (2020). Medicine and artificial intelligence: A strategy for the future, employing Porter’s classic framework. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 61(8), 447. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2019047
Lim, E. K. (2022). Comment on: Doctors and social media: Knowledge gaps and unsafe practices. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 63(3), 170. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2022048
Low, J. M., Tan, M. Y., & Joseph, R. (2022). Authors’ reply: Comment on: Doctors and social media: Knowledge gaps and unsafe practices. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 63(3), 171. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2022049
Oermann, M. H., & Conklin, J. L. (2017). CiteScore and nursing journals. Nurse Author & Editor (NA&E), 27(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4910.2017.tb00242.x
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., Stewart, L. A., Thomas, J., Tricco, A. C., Welch, V. A., Whiting, P., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal (BMJ), 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Paphawasit B., & Wudhikarn, R. (2022). Investigating patterns of research collaboration and citations in science and technology: A case of Chiang Mai University. Administrative Sciences, 12(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12020071
Patrick, K. (2021). CMAJ and antiracism. Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), 193(13), E453-E454. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.210494
Peh, W. C. G., & Ng, K. H. (2010). Writing a letter to the editor. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 51(7), 532-535. https://www.smj.org.sg/article/writing-letter-editor
Rochette, L., & Vergely, C. (2017). Hans Selye and the stress response: 80 years after his "letter" to the editor of Nature [Hans Selye et la réponse au stress : 80 ans après sa lettre à l’Éditeur de Nature]. Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie [Annals of Cardiology and Angiology], 66(4), 181-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancard.2017.04.017
Szabo, S., Tache, Y., & Somogyi, A. (2012). The legacy of Hans Selye and the origins of stress research: A retrospective 75 years after his landmark brief “Letter” to the Editor# of Nature. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress, 15(5), 472-478. https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2012.710919
Schiavo, J. H. (2019). PROSPERO: An international register of systematic review protocols. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 38(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2019.1588072
Selye, H. (1936). A syndrome produced by diverse nocuous agents. Nature, 138(3479), 32. https://www.nature.com/articles/138032a0.pdf
Sia, T. (2002). Skala C.O.R.E.: Pengukur kreativitas yang benar-benar kreatif (Komentar terhadap skala C.O.R.E. sebagai alternatif mengukur kreativitas: Suatu pendekatan kepribadian) [The C.O.R.E. scale: A measure of creativity that is actually creative (Comments on the C.O.R.E. scale as an alternative in creativity measurement: An approach related to personality)]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 18(1), 57-70. https://anima.ubaya.ac.id/index.php?menu=articles&eid=1350456899&actsub=yes&eidsub=1359081514
Suharnan. (2002). Skala C.O.R.E. sebagai alternatif mengukur kreativitas: Suatu pendekatan kepribadian [The C.O.R.E. scale as an altenative in creativity measurement: An approach related to personality]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 18(1), 36-56. https://anima.ubaya.ac.id/index.php?menu=articles&eid=1350456899&actsub=yes&eidsub=1359081433
Supraptiningsih. (2011). Attitudinal meanings in letter-to-editor texts [Unpublished Master's thesis, Universitas Sanata Dharma]. Repository Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta. Retrieved from https://repository.usd.ac.id/33905/2/066332026_Full.pdf
Surijah, E. A., Abraham, J., Suwartono, C., & Siaputra, I. B. (2021). TIM RaDar as a practical screening tool for IMRaD articles: Consensual publication standards among Indonesian psychological journal editors [TIM RaDar sebagai alat screening praktis untuk artikel IMRaD: Standar publikasi konsensual]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 36(2), 127-155. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v36i2.4580
Sturpe, D., Kolar, C., & Janke, K. (2016). Enhancing scholarly dialogue: Inviting letters to the editor. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 8(3), 269-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.02.021
Tan, S. J. J., Damodharan, K., Tay, H. T., & Tang, T. Y. (2022). Chronic pelvic pain as an unusual presentation of May-Thurner syndrome. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 63(1), 51-52. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2021048
The Jakarta Post. (February 10, 2021). Letter to editor. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2021/02/10/letter-to-editor.html
Tierney, E., Rourker, C., & Fenton, J. (2015). What is the role of ‘the letter to the editor’? European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck, 272(9), 2089-2093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3289-7
Toth, A. A., Banks, G. C., Mellor, D., O’Boyle, E. H., Dickson, A., Davis, D. J., DeHaven, A., Bochantin, J., & Borns, J. (2021). Study preregistration: An evaluation of a method for transparent reporting. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(4), 553-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09695-3
Turki, H., Taieb, H. A. H., & Aouicha, M. B. (2018). The value of letters to the editor. Scientometrics, 117(2), 1285-1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2906-4
Warrington, D. J., & Ball, G. H. T. (2021). Comment on: Singapore Medical Journal in the age of social media. Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ), 62(7), 366. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2021094
Winker, M. A., & Fontanarosa, P. B. (1999). Letters: A forum for scientific discourse. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 281(16), 1543. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.16.1543
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles published in ANIMA are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license. You are free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful, non-commercial purpose in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to ANIMA and the original Author(s), link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective Author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to ANIMA to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
By publishing in ANIMA, Author(s) grant any third party the right to use their article to the extent provided by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
