Improving Integrity in Research and Higher Education: An Indonesian Perspective

[Meningkatkan Integritas Dalam Riset dan Pendidikan Tinggi: Sebuah Perspektif Indonesia]

  • Uli Kozok University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa
  • Ide Bagus Siaputra Universitas Surabaya
Abstract Views: 537 times
PDF - Full Text Downloads: 345 times
Keywords: indicators agreed upon, indikator yang disepakati bersama, academic integrity, integritas akademik, scientific work, karya ilmiah, publication policy, kebijakan publikasi

Abstract

Students and lecturers have challenges in publishing the results of their researches and studies as a requirement for graduation, promotion, or performance evaluation for institutions. This can bring up a variety of behaviors in producing scientific papers, ranging from those that should be emulated, questioned, doubtful, to being considered violations. The Indonesian government has issued regulations on academic integrity in producing scientific papers, but there are still new challenges such as misinformation and the use of artificial intelligence. Therefore, there is a need for indicators received together about the level of reasonableness in producing scientific work. This indicator must be relevant globally and accommodative to the local context. To strive for this, it is important to strive for dialogue between the academic community and the government to review publication policies and ensure that the regulations are effective and adaptive to the times and technological progress.

 

Mahasiswa dan dosen memiliki tantangan dalam mempublikasikan hasil penelitian dan studi mereka sebagai syarat kelulusan, kenaikan jabatan, atau evaluasi kinerja bagi lembaga. Hal ini dapat memunculkan beragam perilaku dalam menghasilkan karya ilmiah, mulai dari yang patut dicontoh, dipertanyakan, meragukan, hingga dianggap pelanggaran. Pemerintah Indonesia sudah menerbitkan peraturan tentang integritas akademik dalam menghasilkan karya ilmiah, namun masih ada tantangan baru seperti misinformasi dan penggunaan kecerdasan buatan. Maka dari itu, perlu ada indikator yang diterima bersama tentang tingkat kewajaran dalam menghasilkan karya ilmiah. Indikator ini harus relevan secara global dan akomodatif dengan konteks lokal. Untuk mengupayakan hal tersebut, penting untuk mengupayakan dialog antara sivitas akademika dan pemerintah untuk meninjau kembali kebijakan publikasi dan memastikan bahwa peraturan tersebut efektif dan adaptif terhadap perkembangan zaman dan kemajuan teknologi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Australia National University. (2022). Procedure: Academic promotion. Australia National University (ANU) Policy Library. https://policies.anu.edu.au/ppl/document/ANUP_000624

Bartholomew R. E. (2014). Science for sale: The rise of predatory journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 107(10), 384-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076814548526

Beall, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179. https://doi.org/10.1038/489179a

Bohannon, J. (2013). Who's afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.342.6154.60

Columbia University. (n.d). Promotion and tenure. Columbia University Faculty of Arts and Sciences. https://fas.columbia.edu/faculty-resources/promotion-and-tenure-0

Demir, S. B. (2018). Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why?. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1296-1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.10.008

Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan [Directorate General of Education and Student Affairs]. (2019). Surat edaran nomor B/565/B.B1/HK.01.01/2019 tentang sarana publikasi karya ilmiah mahasiswa. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia.

Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi [Directorate General of Higher Education]. (2021). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan nomor 12/E/KPT/2021 tentang pedoman operasional beban kinerja dosen. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi [Directorate General of Higher Education]. (1999). Surat edaran Dirjen Dikti nomor 3298/D/T/99 tentang upaya pencegahan tindakan plagiat. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi [Directorate General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology]. (2021). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia nomor 134/E/KPT/2021 tentang pedoman akreditasi jurnal ilmiah. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. https://arjuna.kemdikbud.go.id/article/336

Direktur Jenderal Sumber Daya llmu Pengetahuan, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi [Directorate General of Science, Technology, and Higher Education Resources]. (2019). Surat edaran nomor B/4917/D.D2/KK.01.00/2019 tentang pedoman operasional penilaian angka kredit kenaikan jabatan akademik/pangkat dosen. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia.

Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT-3), Osmanovic-Thunström, A., Steingrimsson, S. (2022). Can GPT-3 write an academic paper on itself, with minimal human input? (hal-03701250f). HAL Open Science. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03701250/document

Glendinning, I. (2013). Comparison of policies for academic integrity in higher education across the European Union. IPPHEAE Project Consortium. http://plagiarism.cz/ippheae/files/D2-3-00%20EU%20IPPHEAE%20CU%20Survey%20EU-wide%20report.pdf

González, C., Liu, Y., & Shu, X. (2012). The faculty promotion and merit system in China and the United States: The cases of Wuhan University and the University of California, Davis. Center for Studies in Higher Education (CSHE) - Research and Occasional Papers Series, 13.12. https://cshe.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/publications/rops.gonzalez_et_al.faculty_promotion.10.1.2012.pdf

Harvard University. (n.d). FAS appointment and promotion handbook. Harvard University. https://academic-appointments.fas.harvard.edu/d-senior-lecturers

Hutson, M. (2022). Could AI help you to write your next paper? Nature, 611(7934), 192-193. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-03479-w

Jalalian M. (2015). The story of fake impact factor companies and how we detected them. Electronic Physician, 7(2), 1069-1072. https://doi.org/10.14661/2015.1069-1072

Kozok, U. (2022). Two predatory publishers from “Budapest” and “Great Britain”. Uli Kozok. https://ulikozok.com/research/publications/predatory-journals/a-predatory-publisher-from-budapest/

Lukić, T., Blešić, I., Basarin, B., Ivanović-B. L., Milošević, D., & Sakulski, D. (2014). Predatory and fake scientific journals/publishers: A global outbreak with rising trend: A review. Geographica Pannonica, 18(3), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.5937/geopan1403069l

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (n.d.). 3.0 faculty appointment, promotion, and tenure guidelines. MIT Policies. https://policies.mit.edu/policies-procedures/30-faculty-appointment-promotion-and-tenure-guidelines

Menteri Pendidikan Nasional [Ministy of National Education]. (2010). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia nomor 17 tahun 2010 tentang pencegahan dan penanggulangan plagiat di perguruan tinggi. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Menteri Pendidikan Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi [Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology]. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia nomor 39 tahun 2021 tentang integritas akademik dalam menghasilkan karya ilmiah. Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum - Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/detail_peraturan?main=2943

O'Connor, S., & ChatGPT (2023). Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?. Nurse Education in Practice, 66:103537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia [The Government of the Republic of Indonesia]. (2002). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 19 tahun 2002 tentang hak cipta. Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum - Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual - Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. https://jdih.dgip.go.id/produk_hukum/view/id/57/t/undangundang+nomor+19+tahun+2002+tentang+hak+cipta

Pemerintah Republik Indonesia [The Government of the Republic of Indonesia]. (2014). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang hak cipta. Jaringan Dokumentasi dan Informasi Hukum - Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual - Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. https://jdih.dgip.go.id/produk_hukum/view/id/3/t/undangundang+nomor+28+tahun+2014+tentang+hak+cipta

Petrişor, A. -I. (2016). Evolving strategies of the predatory journals. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 21(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol21no1.1

Resnik, D. B., Rasmussen, L. M., & Kissling, G. E. (2015). An international study of research misconduct policies. Accountability in Research: Ethics, Integrity and Policy, 22(5), 249-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.958218

Scanes, C. G. (2007). Ethics of publication: Is publication an obligation for researchers? Poultry Science, 86(10), 2051-2052. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.10.2051

Sekretariat ARJUNA. (2022). Pencabutan status akreditasi. Akreditasi Jurnal Nasional. https://arjuna.kemdikbud.go.id/article/446

Siaputra, I. B., & Santosa, D. A. (2016). Academic integrity campaign in Indonesia. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 75-86). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_4-1

Siaputra, I. B., & Santosa, D. A. (in press). Academic integrity campaign: An impossible dream but a noble endeavor. In S. E. Eaton (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (2nd ed.). Springer Nature.

Tauginienė, L., & Gaižauskaitė, I. (2022). Jumping with a parachute - is promoting research integrity meaningful? Accountability in Research: Ethics, Integrity and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2044318

University of Auckland. (2018). Academic promotion policy and procedures. University of Auckland. https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/about-us/about-the-university/policy-hub/people-culture/academic-processes-standards/academic-promotions/academic-promotion-policy-procedures.html

University of Portsmouth. (2022). Policy on promotion and appointment to reader and professor. University of Portsmouth. https://policies.docstore.port.ac.uk/policy-082.pdf

Western Sydney University. (n.d.). Promotion to lecturer and senior lecturer policy. Western Sydney University. https://policies.westernsydney.edu.au/document/view.current.php?id=60&version=10

Published
2023-01-25
How to Cite
Kozok, U., & Siaputra, I. B. (2023). Improving Integrity in Research and Higher Education: An Indonesian Perspective: [Meningkatkan Integritas Dalam Riset dan Pendidikan Tinggi: Sebuah Perspektif Indonesia]. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 38(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v38i1.5490